Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Versus Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Difficult Choledocholithiasis and Pancreatic Duct Stones

Last updated: February 17, 2026
Sponsor: Rush University Medical Center
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

4

Condition

Gall Bladder Disorders

Treatment

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy

Laser lithotripsy with low-wattage holmium laser

Clinical Study ID

NCT07418112
24070901-IRB01
  • Ages 19-85
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a low-power holmium laser works to treat large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones in adults. It will also learn about the safety of the low-wattage holmium laser. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is the low-power holmium laser effective at treating large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones? Is the low-power holmium laser effective safe to use in adults? How does the low-power holmium laser compare to electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the management of large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones.

Participants will:

Undergo ERCP procedure and their bile duct or pancreatic duct stone will either be broken up with the low-power holmium laser lithotripsy device or the electrohydraulic lithotripsy lithotripsy device.

Answer a call 30 days after the procedure to document symptoms and/or any side effects.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 19-85 years

  • Signed written informed consent.

  • Presence of one or more biliary (common bile duct or intrahepatic) or pancreaticduct stones that are deemed "difficult" based on at least one of the followingcriteria:

  • Stone diameter ≥ 15 mm in any single dimension as measured on priorcross-sectional imaging (CT, MRCP, or EUS).

  • Presence of an impacted stone that cannot be dislodged with a standard balloonor basket.

  • Stone located proximal to a benign biliary or pancreatic duct stricture.

  • Documented failure of stone extraction during a prior ERCP attempt usingstandard techniques (e.g., sphincterotomy with balloon/basket extraction).

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy: Repeated ERCP would be delayed until after delivery if possible

  • Clinically significant, uncorrectable coagulopathy (defined as INR > 1.5 or plateletcount < 50,000/μL).

  • Surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy that precludes conventional ERCPaccess (e.g., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), unless an alternative access route (e.g.,laparoscopy-assisted or EUS-directed) is planned as the standard of care.

  • Known or highly suspected malignant biliary or pancreatic stricture associated withthe stone.

  • Acute pancreatitis at the time of screening, unless it is gallstone pancreatitiswith persistent biliary obstruction, for which ERCP is therapeutically indicated.

  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease or other comorbidities that, in the judgment of theinvestigator, would make the patient an unsuitable candidate for a prolongedendoscopic procedure under general anesthesia.

  • Known life expectancy of less than 6 months.

  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures or follow-uprequirements.

Study Design

Total Participants: 40
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy
Phase: 4
Study Start date:
January 15, 2026
Estimated Completion Date:
December 31, 2027

Study Description

This study aims to assess two main questions. 1: Whether low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy (using the Quanta System Litho EVO device) is safe and effective in the management large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones. 2: Whether low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is non-inferior to electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the management of large and/or difficult gallstones.

Part one of the study will investigate whether utilizing the low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy device via single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC-LL) is safe and effective to treat large and/or difficult choledocholithiasis or pancreaticolithiasis.

Part two of the study will be a non-inferiority study to determine if SOC-LL is non-inferior for stone clearance, among other secondary outcomes, compared to electrohydraulic lithotripsy via single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC-EHL).

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will undergo ERCP procedures and will either undergo SOC-LL or SOC-EHL to treat their large and/or difficult choledocholithiasis or pancreaticolithiasis. Stone clearance and other procedural or safety measures will be assessed after the procedure. The patient will be monitored after the procedure for adverse events and the administration of medications or admission to the hospital will be determined by the proceduralist. Roughly 30 days after the procedure the patient will be called to assess for any adverse effects as well as to determine symptom resolution.

Connect with a study center

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago 4887398, Illinois 4896861 60612
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.