Comparison of Two Types of Bone Grafts in Patients Who Need One of Their Front Teeth Removed and Replaced With an Implant

Phase

N/A

Condition

N/A

Treatment

CEBX

FDBA

Clinical Study ID

NCT06722482

STUDY00008216

AWD00006192

Ages > 18
All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different bone graft materials (freeze-dried bone allograft, FDBA and collagen-enriched bovine xenograft, CEBX) that are routinely used for preserving the remaining bone after extraction of an anterior tooth, and before placing a dental implant. Patients will be randomly assigned to either group (flip of a coin) One group will receive FDBA material and the other group will receive CEBX (cow) material.

The study aims to examine the following main questions:

Potential differences in linear radiographic horizontal (HRD) and vertical (VRD) ridge dimensional changes between groups after 16 weeks of healing
Other clinical information of the treated areas and information regarding the esthetics of the dental implant that will subsequently be placed at the edentulous site as well as patient satisfaction with the treatment, will be evaluated.

The study will include 7 study visits. Study procedures will take place during the same visits as the standard of care treatments (tooth extraction and bone graft, dental implant placement, crown installation and follow-ups). Clinical information from these standard of care visits will be used for the current research study, such as:

Demographic information
Clinical information from intraoral photographs
Radiographic information from cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

patients able to provide informed consent
patients of 18 years of age or older at time of consent and enrollment
patients in need of at least one anterior tooth extraction and seeking dentalimplant replacement
bone on the buccal of the central/lateral incisors or canines planned for extractionthat is either intact or has a dehiscence </=5mm as determined radiographicallythrough cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

current smokers or tobacco-product users (self-reported)
uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c≥7 in the last 3 months)
pregnant and/or lactating females (self-reported)
patients on immunosuppressants, steroids, bisphosphonates or other medications thathave been related to Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) asdescribed by the American Association of Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) 2014update
patients with history of radiation of the head and neck
patients with allergy to collagen, bacitracin and/or polymyxin B
patients with religious or cultural beliefs that prohibit the use of eitherallograft or bovine graft material
patients with physical and/or mental/cognitive disabilities (self-reported) ordecisionally-impaired, not able to consent for themselves
patients with untreated periodontitis
patients with central/lateral incisors or canines requiring extraction and areadjacent to an edentulous area
patients with central/lateral incisors or canines with buccal bone dehiscence >5mm

Study Design

CEBX

November 27, 2023

November 01, 2026

Study Description

The study will compare clinical, radiographic (dental cone beam computed tomography) and histologic outcomes upon tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) as well as clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes upon implant placement and crown fabrication at the same site.

Both bone graft materials (FDBA and CEBX) are FDA approved and are widely available in the US market and are routinely used in everyday practices and within the university.

FDBA is produced by Community Blood Center (Community Tissue Services, Ohio, USA) (FEI: 3008808182).
CEBX is produced by Geistlich Pharma AG (Wolhusen, Switzerland) [501(k) #: K122894].

Both materials will be stored and utilized based on manufacturers' recommendations and as per of Standard of Care protocols within the university.

Participants and investigators will be unaware of the envelope content and each participant will be asked to randomly pick an envelope and immediately both the participant as well as the investigator will be informed about the envelope content and, therefore, the group allocation. Eventually, participants and investigators will be aware of the group allocation, except for the investigator who will conduct all the study measurements who will remain blinded.

Upon healing, both groups will receive similar treatment as far as implant placement and crown restoration is concerned.

Interventions and procedures

The study-related interventions and procedures will more specifically include:

Evaluation of horizontal and vertical ridge dimensional changes as well as contour changes upon standard of care procedures (alveolar ridge preservation) through cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanning, respectively, after 16 weeks of healing.
Determination of the feasibility of prosthetically driven implant placement upon standard of care evaluation of the post-healing cone beam computed tomography, at 16 weeks after ARP.
Histological evaluation of the healed grafted area upon grafting with frequently used bone graft materials at 16 weeks of healing.
Assessment of peri-implant clinical and radiographic parameters as well as crown esthetics and patient satisfaction upon 12 months from the dental implant placement.

Connect with a study center

Eastman Institute for Oral Health
Rochester, New York 14620
United States
Site Not Available
Eastman Institute for Oral Health
Rochester 5134086, New York 5128638 14620
United States
Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.