Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Class 1 Removable Partial Denture.

Last updated: October 29, 2024
Sponsor: Menoufia University
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Osteoporosis

Bone Density

Osteopenia

Treatment

Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis.

Clinical Study ID

NCT06666595
ADMNF-00701124
  • Ages 50-70
  • All Genders
  • Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Summary

Objective: To report the implant survival rates, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of subcrestal short implant versus crestal standard length implant supported removable partial denture (RPD).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult patients aged 50 years or older with class 1 RPD with missing mandibularmolars at least and complaining from instability of the prosthesis were recruited.

  • Medical history revealed no contraindication to implant therapy.

  • Patients have an amount of bone nearly equal to 8 mm length above the inferioralveolar canal to receive a 6 mm short implant with 2 mm subcrestal to the bonelevel with sufficient bone width ≥ 8mm on one side and an amount of bone equal to ormore than 8 mm to receive a standard-length implant of 7.5, 9, or 10.5 mm placed atcrestal bone level with sufficient bone width ≥ 8mm on the contralateral side whichwas examined by CBCT.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of active infection or inflammation in the areas intended for implantplacement; *systemic diseases such as diabetes.

  • Pregnant and lactating patients.

  • Habit of severe bruxism or clenching.

  • Treatment with therapeutic radiation to the head within the past 12 months.

  • Treatment with bisphosphonate within the past 12 months.

  • More than 10 cigarettes/day smoking habit.

Study Design

Total Participants: 30
Treatment Group(s): 1
Primary Treatment: Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis.
Phase:
Study Start date:
January 04, 2021
Estimated Completion Date:
August 01, 2025

Study Description

30 individuals with at least 2 adjacent missing teeth bilaterally were included.to support class Ι RPD with conventional loading protocol were chosen for this research. Each participant received 2 implants in a split mouth design, one side received 1 subcrestal short implant and the contralateral side crestal standard length implant. Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), radiographic crestal bone level (CBL) and implant survival rate were evaluated. at implant placement (T0), restoration delivery (T1), and 3-year follow-up after loading (T2). MBL was calculated as the change in distance from the implant-abutment interface to the first radiographically visible bone-implant contact. A repeated-measures mixed ANOVA followed by a paired Student's t-test with the Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

Connect with a study center

  • Mohammed A. El-Sawy

    Mansoura, 12345
    Egypt

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.