Informed by self-determination theory and the evolutionary theory, the intervention aims
to enable primary school students in Hong Kong to enhance behavioral management and
choose healthier behaviors by 1) promoting their autonomy, relatedness, and competence;
and 2) achieving more social rewards through prosocial opportunities. These are theorized
as being facilitated by 1) autonomy in taking pro-social responsibilities, 2) competence
empowerment, and 3) interpersonal relatedness (teacher-student and peer relatedness). The
intervention aims to do so via three intervention components (see intervention logic
model Appendix Figure A1). First, social-emotional learning (SEL) will be delivered to
students to improve students competence in five developmental domains (i.e.,
self-awareness, social-awareness, self-management, responsible decision-making, and
relationship skills. Second, students will be offered the opportunity to autonomously
take responsible and meaningful roles and to earn social benefits. Third, built on
meaningful role-taking, students will recognize and connect to others by expressing
compliments and by helping others in need in their own ways. The above three components
will serve as both the universal and indicated approach. The universal approach aims at
reducing misconduct and enhancing prosocial behaviors among all students. The indicated
approach, through the use of tailored social roles and application of SEL training with
specific topics (e.g., stress management, conflict solving, interpersonal skill lab),
targets socially integrated bullies and socially marginalized bullies respectively.
Schools are recruited voluntarily. Based on the inclusion criteria, all eligible schools
will be identified from the list of primary schools in Hong Kong, totaling 477, obtained
from the Hong Kong Education Bureau. With the support of a local NGO, invitations will be
sent to all qualifying middle-band schools through the nonprofit organization. In the
invitation email, schools will receive information about training, implementation, and
the nature of the proposed evaluation to gain their initial interest and commitment.
Participation will be offered on a first-come-first-served basis to schools that respond
to the invitation email and confirm their commitment, in writing, to (1) deliver the
assigned intervention program and (2) participate in the evaluation. If parents or
caregivers are willing to have their children participate in the CRCT, they will be
required to provide informed written consent. Meanwhile, parents can request the
withdrawal of their children from the trial assessments at baseline or at any other time
throughout the project. Additionally, students will sign an assent to indicate their
agreement or disagreement to participate in the research.
The author of the study and the registered social workers (RSW) from the collaborated
agency will coach and support the intervention schools throughout the implementation.
Each facilitator (headteacher from each class) will be assigned to a supervisor (RSW) to
discuss the implementation. Meanwhile, five fidelity control methods will be applied in
this program.
Programme manuals. Detailed program manuals are tailored for different intervention
components in CSEL and MSEL arms. The program manual for the CSEL group includes all
the details regarding the operation of the 6-session SEL curriculum. For the MSEL
group, other than the program manual for SEL curriculum, the program manuals for
meaningful role-taking and secret angel are also for headteachers.
Intervention training. Before the intervention begins, headteachers in the
intervention group will be systematically trained for 2 times (2 hours each), which
fully covers the operation of program manuals. First, headteachers in CSEL will be
trained in delivering the SEL curriculum. Headteachers will be provided with the
opportunities to go through the manual with the trainers (professional social
workers from the collaborated agency) and empowered with SEL-related techniques
(e.g., ROPE for SEL training rules) and skills (e.g., cultivating a safe environment
for sharing) through various training setups, such as role-play, group activities
and mock class.
SEL lesson report. Facilitators will fill out a lesson report form each time they
deliver an SEL session.
Implementation checklist. To verify intervention fidelity, two individuals who are
not members of the program will observe the implementation of all intervention
components and document the concordance between a prespecified checklist of elements
for the intervention and the actual implementation itself. These checklists are
developed separately for each intervention component. Interrater reliability using
the Kappa statistic will be computed to assess the coding reliability.
Biweekly and monthly meetings. Facilitators and their assigned supervisors will
conduct biweekly meetings to discuss the lesson report, teaching strategies, and
other contingencies. Additionally, monthly meetings will be held between the
research team and supervisors to check on the implementation of the intervention and
to fix problems if necessary.
