The Role of Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in The Management of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

Last updated: August 8, 2024
Sponsor: Abdelrahman Ibrahim Sayed Mohamed Abdalla
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Venous Thromboembolism

Thrombosis

Venous Thrombosis

Treatment

Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in The Management of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

Clinical Study ID

NCT06341010
The Role of Angiojet Rheolytic
  • Ages 18-60
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rheolytic thrombectomy in restoring venous patency DVT, periprocedural complications and development of PTS after tratment of iliofemoral DVT.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

Acute IF DVT

life expectancy more than 1 year

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrence of DVT Chronic DVT The catheter cannot be used in vessels smaller than 6mm. Patients have contraindications for endovascular procedures Patients cannottolerate contrast media In patients with lesions that cannot be accessed with theguide wire Pregnancy History of pelvic surgery with left iliac vein injury or pelvicradioactive therapy

Study Design

Total Participants: 25
Treatment Group(s): 1
Primary Treatment: Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in The Management of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis
Phase:
Study Start date:
May 01, 2024
Estimated Completion Date:
September 01, 2026

Study Description

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common disease affecting approximately 0.1% of the world population.1 The incidence of DVT steadily increases as the patient gets older. One-third of patients with DVT may develop pulmonary embolism (PE)2. DVT can significantly influence the quality of life of patients, and it represents an important clinical and economic disease burden on health-care systems.

Over the years, different options for DVT treatment have been introduced to restore patency, save valve function, and reduce the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS).

The conventional treatment of acute DVT aims to prevent thrombus propagation and to reduce the risks of PE and DVT recurrence5. However, this treatment is ineffective at reducing thrombus burden and consequently does not prevent PTS. Recent advances in catheter-based interventions have led to the development of a variety of minimally invasive endovascular strategies to remove venous thrombus.

Lower-extremity DVT, especially proximal or iliofemoral DVT, has been demonstrated to confer the greatest risk for complications such as pulmonary embolism, thrombosis recurrence, and post- thrombotic syndrome. Most practice guidelines recommend early clot removal for patients with iliofemoral DVT who have symptoms less than 14 days in duration, good functional ability, and acceptable life expectancy and who are at low risk for bleeding complications.

Removal of clot can be achieved by using catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or pharmacomechanical.Use of CDT is limited because of the lengthy procedure/hospitalization time and intensive care unit (ICU) stays required for the procedure11. pharmacomechanical was developed to address the limitations of CDT by combining catheter-based and mechanical technology to fragment and/or aspirate thrombus in addition to delivering a thrombolytic drug throughout the thrombus.

Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) technique is highly effective at clearing thrombus, which preserves venous valve function and prevents subsequent PTS. The use of RT to treat DVT may reduce long-term morbidity in DVT patients by restoring the patency of the veins and preventing pulmonary embolism.

Connect with a study center

  • Asyut university

    Asyūţ,
    Egypt

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.