Trial Evaluating the Rate of Pneumothorax in Severe Emphysema Secondary to Endoscopic Volume Reduction with Two-stage ZEPHYR® Valves Versus Endoscopic Volume Reduction with One-stage ZEPHYR® Valves

Last updated: March 13, 2025
Sponsor: University Hospital, Limoges
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Chest Trauma

Emphysema

Treatment

Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 2 stages

Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 1 stage

Clinical Study ID

NCT06181357
87RI21_0031 (REPEAT)
  • Ages 35-80
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects 3.5 million people and is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Emphysema involves air retention in the lungs and is ultimately responsible for a major deterioration in the quality of life. Available drug treatments have moderate efficacy whereas surgical lung volume reduction can improve exercise capacity when offered to a very selected population but at the cost of significant morbidity and mortality.

Endoscopic Lung Volume reduction with ZEPHYR® valves improves respiratory function at rest, exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with little or no interlobar collateral ventilation.

If this technique has therefore proven its effectiveness, it is not devoid of complications and is notably responsible for pneumothorax in 27% of cases. The management of this complication is clearly codified, ranging from patient monitoring to the removal of one or more valves. It is therefore a subject of major concern for multiple reasons: high incidence, lengthening of hospital stay, increase in the overall cost of care, potential loss of benefit for the patient in the event of permanent withdrawal. valves and above all a potentially fatal event.

A new strategy for implanting ZEPHYR® valves in two stages has been developed in Limoges University Hospital. This innovative algorithm has been evaluated in several non-comparative single or multicenter studies. In those studies, pneumothorax' rate secondary to lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves is rated between 4.5 and 12%. The efficacy of the treatment appears to be comparable with the data found in the trials evaluating in which the entire lobe was treated in one procedure. Moreover, despite two procedures, there does not seem to be any increased risk of occurrence of other complications. Finally, the systematic scheduling of a thoracic computed tomography between the two procedures showed that 26.6% of patients presented a reduction in volume greater than 350mL despite incomplete treatment.

These data seem promising but no direct comparison with standard one-step treatment has ever been conducted so far.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient able to give informed consent and participate in the study

  • Age ≥ 35 years old and ≤ 80 years old at the time of signing the consent

  • Emphysema (homogeneous or heterogeneous) on a recent CT scan (< 6 months).Heterogeneous emphysema defined by a difference of at least 15% destruction (threshold 910HU) between two adjacent lobes.

  • Destruction ≥ 50% (threshold 910 HU) of the target lobe on the chest scanner

  • Smoking quit for 3 months

  • Dyspnea ≥ 2 according to the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire)

  • Post-bronchodilator FEV between 15 and 50% theoretical

  • Post-bronchodilator total lung capacity ≥ 100% theoretical and post-bronchodilatorresidual volume ≥ 175% theoretical

  • Distance traveled during the TM6M ≥ 100m

  • Member of or beneficiary of a social security scheme

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Asthma considered as main diagnosis

  • Recurrent exacerbations: (>3 over the last year or 2 requiring hospitalization)

  • Myocardial infarction or stroke in the 6 months prior to inclusion

  • Symptoms of heart failure in the 6 months prior to inclusion

  • Chest CT abnormalities: giant bulla (occupying more than a third of the pulmonaryfield), paraseptal emphysema, pulmonary nodule greater than 0.8cm (not applicablepulmonary nodules known for more than a year and stable), fibrosing interstitialpneumonitis, dilated bronchi

  • Pulmonary tomoscintigraphy:

  • Patients for whom the least perfused lobe is not the one with the highestemphysema destruction score

  • Patients with homogeneous emphysema for whom the perfusion delta (difference inperfusion between the ipsilateral lung and the treated lobe) is less than 10%

  • Arterial blood gas analysis in ambient air: Hypoxemia in ambient air (PaO2 < 45mmHg). Hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 55 mmHg)

  • Echocardiography:

  • Left Ventricular Ejection Function < 45%

  • Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure > 45 mmHg

  • History of pneumonectomy, lung surgery homolateral to the lobe targeted forendoscopic lung volume reduction

  • History of pneumothorax homolateral to the lobe targeted for endoscopic lung volumereduction

  • History of endoscopic volume reduction

  • Oral corticosteroid therapy > 20 mg/day within the 4 weeks preceding inclusion

  • Symptomatic bronchial dilatations, bronchial colonization with pseudomonasaeruginosa, multi-resistant bacteria or aspergillus origin

  • Metastatic cancer undergoing treatment or whose treatments ended less than 5 yearsago

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

  • Nickel allergy

  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship or under judicial protection

  • Participation in another interventional clinical research

  • Any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere withthe objective of the study or would cause the subject's participation in the studyto be suboptimal, in particular (non-exhaustive list) unweaned alcoholism, substanceabuse, non-compliance with usual follow-up visits)

secondary exclusion criteria:

  • Evidence of collateral ventilation measured by the Chartis system

Study Design

Total Participants: 244
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 2 stages
Phase:
Study Start date:
May 06, 2024
Estimated Completion Date:
June 06, 2027

Study Description

The Zephyr® valve was first implanted in 2001. Since then, 5 important studies have proven a clinical superiority compared to the existing standard of care. Bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction with the use of one-way endobronchial valves is a potential treatment for patients with severe emphysema. Loss of lung elastic recoil leads to airflow obstruction, gas trapping, and increased operating lung volumes. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), resection of the most affected of the lung, has been clearly shown to improve outcomes in selected patient groups. The surgical intervention is, however, associated with significant morbidity and an early mortality rate of about 5%. Therefore, there is considerable interest in developing novel treatment approaches that can reduce lung volume and gas trapping, either more safely than LVRS or in patients for whom LVRS is not an option.

In the present study, 244 patients will be randomized. After the selection process, they will all be hospitalized in order to undergo an endoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valve under general anesthesia. Half of them, the experimental group, will be treated according to Limoges' treatment algorithm (2 stages). For the other half, the control group, the entire lobe will be treated during one procedure will. Both groups will receive the standard of care treatments, according to the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease recommendations (GOLD).

Both groups will be followed for one year:

  • All the patients will undergo a thorax CT scan 45 days after implanting the last valve. Three follow-up consultations are planned at 45 days, 6, and 12 months. During these consultations, each patient will complete a Saint-George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Test, a plethysmography and a 6-minutes walking test.

  • Patients randomized in the experimental group will undergo a plethysmography and a thorax CT scan one day before the second procedure.

Connect with a study center

  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU de Brest

    Brest, 29000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU de Dijon

    Dijon, 21000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • chu de Grenoble

    Grenoble, 38000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU de Lille

    Lille, 59000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU de Limoges

    Limoges, 87000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • APHM

    Marseille, 13000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • Hopital Saint Joseph

    Marseille, 13000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU de Nice

    Nice, 06000
    France

    Site Not Available

  • APHP

    Paris, 75018
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU de Rouen

    Rouen, 76000
    France

    Site Not Available

  • chu de Strasbourg

    Strasbourg, 67000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • Hopital Foch

    Suresnes, 92150
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • chu de Toulouse

    Toulouse, 31000
    France

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.