NeoAdj. Therapy Comparing Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) vs. SG+Pembrolizumab in Low-risk, Triple-neg. EBC (ADAPT-TN-III)

Last updated: February 11, 2025
Sponsor: West German Study Group
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

2

Condition

Breast Cancer

Treatment

Pembrolizumab

Sacituzumab govitecan

Clinical Study ID

NCT06081244
WSG-AM13
  • Ages > 18
  • Female

Study Summary

TNBC is known for poor prognosis, aggressive patterns of disease, and significant molecular heterogeneity. (Neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is standard of care in all node-positive and in node-negative patients with a tumour size >5 mm according to current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, TNBC patients with lower stage disease do clearly have a better prognosis compared to more advanced stages. Patients with stage I-II node-negative disease have 3-5 year iDFS rates of 80-90% (with majority of relapses within the first three years) as shown in several trials.Although survival results appear much better in the lower vs. higher stages, there is a high clinical need in this most common group of TNBC patients in Western Europe and USA.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ER + PR negative or low positive (≤10% positive cells in IHC), and HER2 negative (i.e., IHC 0 - 1+ or IHC 2+ with FISH negative) breast cancer

  2. All patients, independent from gender

  3. ≥18 years at diagnosis

  4. Histologically confirmed unilateral, primary invasive carcinoma of the breast Note:bilateral, multicentric, or multifocal carcinoma may be included, if there is aclear target lesion, that is subject to treatment decisions and solely evaluated anddocumented for study purposes.

  5. Clinical stage I: cT1a-c, cN0 (clinical stage II only, if patient does not qualifyfor neoadjuvant polychemotherapy+PEM, e.g., elderly population, per investigator´sdecision)

  6. No clinical evidence for distant metastasis (M0)

  7. Tumour block available for central pathology review

  8. Performance Status ECOG ≤ 1 or KI ≥ 80%

  9. Negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days prior to registration inpremenopausal patients

  10. Written informed consent prior to beginning specific protocol procedures, includingexpected cooperation of the patients for the treatment and follow-up, must beobtained and documented according to the local regulatory requirements

  11. The patient must be willing and able to comply with the requirements andrestrictions in this protocol and accessible for treatment and follow-up

  12. Laboratory requirements:

  • Leucocytes ≥3.5 109/L,

  • Neutrophils > 1.5 109/L,

  • Platelets ≥100 109/L,

  • Haemoglobin ≥10 g/dL,

  • AP < 5.0 ULN,

  • AST ≤2.5 x ULN,

  • ALT ≤2.5 x ULN,

  • Total bilirubin ≤1 x ULN,

  • Creatinine ≤1.5 × ULN OR clearance ≥30 mL/min for participant with creatininelevels >1.5 × institutional ULN

  1. Clinical assessments:

• LVEF within normal limits of each institution, measured by echocardiography andnormal ECG (within 42 days prior to treatment)

  1. The following age-specific requirements apply:
  • Women aged <50 years will be considered post-menopausal if they have beenamenorrhoeic for 12 months or more following cessation of exogenous hormonaltreatments and if they have luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulatinghormone (FSH) levels in the post-menopausal range for the site.

  • Women aged ≥ 50 years will be considered post-menopausal if they have beenamenorrhoeic for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenoushormonal treatments.

  1. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubtwill be required to use one of the contraception methods outlined for women ofchild-bearing potential if they wish to continue their HRT during the study.Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal statusprior to randomization/study enrolment. For most forms of HRT, at least 2-4 weekswill elapse between the cessation of therapy and the blood draw; this intervaldepends on the type and dosage of HRT. Following confirmation of theirpost-menopausal status, they can resume use of HRT during the study without use of acontraceptive method.

  2. Female patients of childbearing potential who are sexually active with anon-sterilized male partner must use at least one highly effective method ofcontraception, presented in Table 1 (see Section 4.4.2), from the time of screeningand must agree to continue using such precautions for 7 months after the last doseof IMP. Not all methods of contraception are highly effective. Female patients mustrefrain from breastfeeding while on study and for 7 months after the last dose ofIMP. Complete heterosexual abstinence for the duration of the study and drug washoutperiod is an acceptable contraceptive method if it is line with the patient's usuallifestyle (consideration must be made to the duration of the clinical trial);however, periodic, or occasional abstinence, the rhythm method, and the withdrawalmethod are not acceptable.

  3. Female patients must not donate, or retrieve for their own use, ova from the time ofrandomisation and throughout the study treatment period, and for at least 7 monthsafter the final study drug administration. They should refrain from breastfeedingthroughout this time. Preservation of ova may be considered prior to enrolment inthis study.

  4. A male participant must agree to use a contraception as detailed in Appendix C ofthis protocol during the treatment period and for at least 7 months after the lastdose of study treatment and refrain from donating sperm during this period.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known hypersensitivity reaction to the compounds or incorporated substances of theIMPs

  2. Prior malignancy with a disease-free survival of < 5 years, except curativelytreated basalioma of the skin or pTis of the cervix uteri

  3. Any history of invasive breast cancer

  4. Previous or concurrent treatment with cytotoxic agents for any non-oncologicalreason unless clarified with sponsor

  5. Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs

  6. Participation in another interventional clinical trial with or without anyinvestigational not marketed drug within 30 days prior to study entry

  7. Concurrent pregnancy; patients of childbearing potential or potentially childbearingpartners of male patients must implement a highly effective (less than 1% failurerate) non-hormonal contraceptive measures during the study treatment

  8. Breast feeding woman

  9. Reasons indicating risk of poor compliance

  10. Patients not able to consent

  11. Known polyneuropathy ≥ grade 2

  12. Severe and relevant co-morbidity that would interact with the application ofcytotoxic agents or the participation in the study including recovery from majorsurgery, autoimmune disease, known psychiatric/substance abuse disorders, acutecystitis, ischuria, and chronic kidney disease

  13. Uncontrolled infection requiring i.v. antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals

  14. History of pneumonitis

  15. Active primary immunodeficiency, known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection,or active hepatitis B or C infection. Patients positive for hepatitis C (HCV)antibody are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction is negative for HCV RNA.Patients should be tested for HIV prior to randomisation if required by localregulations or ethics committee (EC).

  16. Have active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). In patients with ahistory of HBV or HCV, patients with detectable viral loads will be excluded.

  • Patients who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Patientswho test positive for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) will require HBV DNAby quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for confirmation of activedisease.

  • Patients who test positive for HCV antibody will require HCV RNA byquantitative PCR for confirmation of active disease. Patients with a knownhistory of HCV or a positive HCV antibody test will not require a HCV antibodyat screening and will only require HCV RNA by quantitative PCR for confirmationof active disease.

  1. Patients who test positive for HIV antibody.

Study Design

Total Participants: 348
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Pembrolizumab
Phase: 2
Study Start date:
October 10, 2024
Estimated Completion Date:
September 30, 2029

Study Description

About 15% of breast cancers lack both, expression of ER and PR receptors, and amplification/over-expression of HER2 receptors, and are thus described as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC is known for poor prognosis, aggressive patterns of disease, and significant molecular heterogeneity. (Neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is standard of care in all node-positive and in node-negative patients with a tumour size >5 mm according to current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, TNBC patients with lower stage disease do clearly have a better prognosis compared to more advanced stages. Patients with stage I-II node-negative disease have 3-5 year iDFS rates of 80-90% (with majority of relapses within the first three years) as shown in several trials. Our own results from the PlanB- and ADAPT-trials, and pooled analysis with SUCCESS C-trials show 3-year iDFS of 86-90% in node-negative TNBC with a tumour size < 3 cm. Although survival results appear much better in the lower vs. higher stages, there is a high clinical need in this most common group of TNBC patients in Western Europe and USA.

In the neoadjuvant setting, it has been shown that the prognosis of patients with TNBC is strongly dependent on their response to NACT: Patients achieving pathological complete response (pCR), or a near pCR (an excellent response after NACT (residual cancer burden (RCB) score 0-1), in some studies do have an excellent prognosis that is not significantly different from that observed in other breast cancer subtypes. However, patients with a less responsive disease (i.e., with RCB Score 2-3) suffer from a significantly worse prognosis compared to non-TNBC.

Chemotherapy in TNBC The optimal chemotherapy regimen for patients with TNBC remains to be identified. Standard anthracycline-taxane (A/T)-based NACT combinations render pCR rates between 25-50%. However, the survival impact of anthracyclines remains controversial due to conflicting results of different randomized trials. Adding carboplatin (carbo) to A/T-containing poly-NACT or use of dose-intensified poly-NACT significantly increases pCR-rates up to 49-60% in mostly stage II-III disease with conflicting survival results and higher toxicity. Hence, use of pragmatic taxane-carboplatin anthracycline-free combinations appears as an effective treatment option in TNBC instead of further treatment escalation. This probably is independent of the germline BRCA (gBRCA) status, due to its general chemo-predictive effect. Unfortunately, no prospective phase-III-data are available so far. However, indirect comparison between trials renders similar pCR rates in taxane-carboplatin based vs. A/T+/-carbo-based regimens in early TNBC.

In the ADAPT-TN neoadjuvant trial, the taxane-carbo arm (12-week nab-paclitaxel (nab-pac)+carbo) was well tolerable (only 10% SAE-rate), highly effective (pCR, ypT0/is/ypN0, of 46%) and superior to the gemcitabine (gem)-arm (nab-pac+gem, pCR of 29%). In this study, omission of further chemotherapy was allowed in patients with pCR after 12 weeks of therapy and was not associated with decreased survival after 3 years [5] and longer follow up.

Although a standard chemotherapy as well as optimal therapy duration are still to be defined, several studies are showing a comparable efficacy for longer vs. shorter adjuvant treatments in TNBC [3], as well as a similar efficacy regarding pCR in HR-negative (in contrast to HR-positive) early breast cancer (eBC) [26]. Moreover 6 vs. 4 cycles of the same chemotherapy (AC or pac weekly) yielded a similar survival outcome in eBC despite of HR-status. No such comparison regarding treatment duration is available for modern antibody-drug conjugates like sacituzumab govitecan (SG).

Therefore, an examination of shorter (12 weeks vs. 18 weeks) regimen as neoadjuvant treatment appears to be a very promising strategy at least in patients with lower risk disease or in elderly patients, who do not qualify for polychemotherapy treatments.

In the Keynote-522 trial combination of carboplatin/taxane-anthracycline NACT with the anti-PD1-antibody pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be associated with a significantly higher pCR and clinically meaningful better EFS and a trend to better OS. Noteworthy only patients with more advanced stages IIa-III TNBC were included into the Keynote-522 trial. Although this effect was independent of clinically assessed nodal status, there is still some uncertainty on the optimal treatment in patients with clinical stage I.

In the metastatic setting, SG as a Trop-2-antibody-drug-conjugate has been shown to be highly efficacious in severely pre-treated patients (all with A/T pre-treated tumours, most of them carboplatin and 1/3 also anti-PD1 pre-treated) compared to chemotherapy of investigator´s choice. Treatment with SG was associated with significant longer median PFS (5.5 vs. 1.7 months) and longer median OS (12.1 vs. 6.7 months). Objective response was dramatically higher in the SG group vs. treatment by physician´s choice group (34.9 vs. 4.7%), in particular in the 2nd-3rd-line therapy (40% vs. 4%). Moreover, Tropics-02 trial has shown higher efficacy of SG vs. chemotherapy of investigator´s choice in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

In the neoadjuvant setting, recently presented results from the NeoSTAR trial show a promising pCR-rate of 30% and RCB 0-1-rate of 36% in TNBC patients with mostly stage II-III-disease (about 80%) after only 4 cycles of SG.

The following clinical questions are of highest medical need

  1. Can 12-18 weeks neoadjuvant treatment with SG alone or in combination with PEM be associated with comparable pCR-rates (but more favourable safety profile) as shown for polychemotherapy in TNBC patients at lower relapse risk in historical controls?

  2. Can SG-based therapy, as the most promising agent in patients with chemo-resistant disease, be associated with a such better prognosis (measured by 3-year-iDFS) compared to historical controls, which would make a randomized phase III-trial obsolete?

Connect with a study center

  • Stadtklinik Baden-Baden / Brustzentrum

    Baden-Baden, Baden-Württemberg 76532
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Kliniken Böblingen

    Böblingen, Baden-Württemberg 71032
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie & Hämatologie

    Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg 79110
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Frauenklinik

    Heilbronn, Baden-Württemberg 74078
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen

    Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg 72076
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • GRN Klinik Weinheim

    Weinheim, Baden-Württembergs 69469
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Rotkreuzklinikum München

    München, Bayern 80637
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • DBZ Onkologie GmbH

    Berlin, Brandenburg 12623
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gGmbH

    Potsdam, Brandenburg 14467
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide gGmbH

    Bremerhaven, Bremen 27574
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus

    Frankfurt am Main, Hessen 60431
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Ev. Krankenhaus Berlin-Spandau

    Berlin, NRW 13589
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bielefeld

    Bielefeld, NRW 33604
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • MVZ Medical Center Düsseldorf - GynOnco

    Düsseldorf, NRW 40235
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • St. - Antonius - Hospital

    Eschweiler, NRW 52249
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte

    Essen, NRW 45136
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Senologie/Interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum

    Essen, NRW 45136
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • ev. Klinikum Gelsenkirchen - Klinik für Senelogie

    Gelsenkirchen, NRW 45879
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • St. Barbara Klinik Hamm GmbH

    Hamm, NRW 59074
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Krankenhaus Holweide

    Köln, NRW 51067
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Köln-Hohenlind

    Köln, NRW 50935
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Ev. Krankenhaus Bethesda Brustzentrum Niederrhein

    Mönchengladbach, NRW 41061
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • MVZ MediaVita, St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster

    Münster, NRW 48145
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • MKS St.Paulus GmbH (ehem.Marienkrankenhaus)

    Schwerte, NRW 58239
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Praxisnetzwerk Hämatologie und Onkologie, Troisdorf

    Troisdorf, NRW 53840
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Marien Hospital Witten

    Witten, NRW 58452
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal Barmen

    Wuppertal, NRW 42283
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • MVZ II der Niels Stensen Kliniken

    Georgsmarienhütte, Niedersachsen 49124
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Klinikum Mutterhaus-Trier

    Trier, Rheinland-Pfalz 54290
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Caritasklinikum Saarbrücken

    Saarbrücken, Saarland 66113
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

    Leipzig, Sachsen 04103
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Johanniter GmbH Johanniter Krankenhaus Stendal

    Stendal, Sachsen-Anhalts 39576
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Hämatologisch/Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bremen

    Bremen, 28209
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Mammazentrum Hamburg am Krankenhaus Jerusalem

    Hamburg, 20357
    Germany

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.