Regorafenib Combined With TAS-102 Versus Regorafenib Monotherapy in Third or Later Line Therapy of mCRC

Last updated: July 24, 2023
Sponsor: Fudan University
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

2

Condition

Colorectal Cancer

Metastatic Cancer

Treatment

Trifluridine/Tipiracil

Regorafenib

Clinical Study ID

NCT05970705
FDZL-REGOT
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefit of regorafenib combined with TAS-102 compared with regorafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed at least two lines of treatment, to explore the rationality of this combination therapy strategy and to obtain relevant survival and safety data.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

A total of 101 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who meet the inclusion criteriaand do not meet the exclusion criteria for receiving third-line or later-line therapy willbe randomly assigned to receive corresponding treatment in a 1:1 ratio. Inclusion Criteria: The subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for this study:

  1. Patients with histologically confirmed recurrent/metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.
  2. Patients who have failed at least one prior standard first- or second-line therapy,including fluoropyrimidine-based therapy, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab.Treatment failure is defined as either radiographic evidence of disease progression orunacceptable toxicity during treatment or within three months following completion oftherapy. (Note: a. each line of therapy should include at least one or more chemotherapy agentsadministered for at least one cycle; b. adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy is allowed. Ifrelapse or metastasis occurs during or within six months after completion ofadjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, it is considered a failure of first-line chemotherapyfor progressive disease. c. For patients with RAS/RAF wild-type tumors, the use of anEGFR inhibitor is not required.)
  3. At least one measurable lesion, with the longest diameter ≥10 mm on spiral CT or ≥20mm on conventional CT (RECIST 1.1 criteria).
  4. ECOG performance status of 0-2.
  5. Life expectancy of ≥12 weeks.
  6. Adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function measured within the screening periodprior to randomization: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 × 109 /L, hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL, platelet count ≥ 75 × 109 /L, total bilirubin <1.5 × ULN, ALT and AST <2.5 ×ULN (≤5 × ULN for patients with liver involvement), serum creatinine ≤1.5 × ULN, andcreatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min.
  7. Women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception.
  8. Voluntarily participating in this study, signing the informed consent form,understanding the purpose of the study and the necessary procedures, and willing toparticipate in this study.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria: Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

  1. Proteinuria ≥2+ on dipstick or 24-hour urinary protein ≥1.0 g/24 h.
  2. Abnormal coagulation function (PT>16s, APTT>43s, TT>21s, Fbg<2g/L), bleeding tendency,or receiving thrombolysis or anticoagulation therapy.
  3. Patients at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, including those with active digestiveulcers and fecal occult blood (++) and those with histories of black stools orhematemesis within three months.
  4. Receiving systemic antitumor therapy, including chemotherapy, signal transductioninhibitors, or immune therapies, within three weeks prior to screening.
  5. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, diastolicblood pressure >90 mmHg) despite antihypertensive medication, grade I or highercoronary heart disease, grade I or higher arrhythmia (including QTc intervalprolongation with ≥450 ms for men and ≥470 ms for women), or grade I or higher heartfailure.
  6. Patients with a history of thrombotic or embolic events requiring treatment within thepreceding six months.
  7. Patients who have received radiation therapy targeting the selected target lesion.
  8. Symptomatic brain or meningeal metastasis.
  9. Uncontrolled pleural or peritoneal effusion.
  10. Receiving kidney dialysis.
  11. Serious or uncontrolled infection.
  12. Pregnant or lactating women or women of childbearing potential without adequatecontraception.
  13. Multiple factors affecting oral drug administration (dysphagia, chronic diarrhea, andbowel obstruction).
  14. Patients who have been treated with small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitorscontaining VEGFR (such as apatinib, fruquintinib, anlotinib, and lenvatinib).
  15. Patients who have been treated with TAS-102.
  16. Participation in another clinical study within four weeks prior to screening.
  17. Patients with comorbidities that could seriously endanger patients' safety or affecttheir completion of the study.

Study Design

Total Participants: 101
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Trifluridine/Tipiracil
Phase: 2
Study Start date:
July 01, 2023
Estimated Completion Date:
July 04, 2026

Study Description

Based on the current diagnostic and treatment guidelines, regorafenib and TAS-102 monotherapy are both standard third-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet the overall treatment sequence or preference is not clear. A retrospective study directly compared the efficacy of regorafenib and TAS-102 monotherapy for third-line treatment of mCRC, and found similar efficacy between the two treatments. However, the benefits of current third-line monotherapy for mCRC are still limited. Patients who receive oral regorafenib monotherapy have an ORR of less than 5%, disease control rate of 50-60%, and TAS-102 has an ORR of 1.1%-1.6% and a disease control rate of less than 50% in third-line treatment of mCRC. These drugs have limited prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS), and disease progression and drug resistance often occur shortly after medication use. Most mCRC patients have a high tumor burden during third-line treatment, and how to improve the remission rate of treatment, improve patients' quality of life due to high tumor burden, increase disease control, and further bring better survival benefits is still a big challenge for third-line treatment. Regorafenib and TAS-102 have different mechanisms of action and different adverse reaction spectra. When the two drugs are used in combination, they may complement each other in terms of efficacy and are also less likely to have toxic effects.

In the RECOURSE study, 17% of patients in the TAS-102 treatment group had received prior treatment with regorafenib. Subgroup analysis showed that the efficacy of TAS-102 was not dependent on whether or not the patient had previously received regorafenib treatment. Therefore, the combination of regorafenib and TAS-102 may be a valuable treatment option for refractory mCRC. However, there is little clinical research data on whether the combination therapy could further improve efficacy and prolong patient survival compared to monotherapy. In 2021, a phase Ib small-sample study from Germany explored the combined use of regorafenib and TAS-102 in third-line treatment of mCRC. The study included 12 patients who received combined treatment with regorafenib and TAS-102 in third-line treatment. After a 3+3 dose-exploration trial, three cases of DLT were all grade 3 hypertension related to regorafenib. The combination of TAS-102 25 mg/m2 twice daily and regorafenib 120 mg was well tolerated, with a median PFS of 3.81 months (95% CI: 1.51-5.2), and a median OS of 11.1 months (95% CI: 2.3-18.2). The results of this early-phase clinical trial suggest that compared to regorafenib monotherapy in the CORRECT study with a median PFS of less than two months and a median OS of less than seven months, the third-line combination treatment of regorafenib and TAS-102 may potentially provide patients with greater clinical benefits. In conclusion, the combination therapy of regorafenib and TAS-102 may be further explored and studied for late-stage colorectal cancer in third-line or after third-line treatment.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefits and safety of the combination of regorafenib and TAS-102 compared to regorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have failed second-line or later treatments. The efficacy and safety of the combination therapy will be fully evaluated, and explorations of efficacy, PFS, OS, safety, and related biomarkers associated with the combined treatment of regorafenib and TAS-102 will be conducted.

Connect with a study center

  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

    Shanghai, Shanghai 200032
    China

    Active - Recruiting

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.