Bibliographic research methodology
In order to have a relevant bibliographic base, the investigators selected articles with
a high level of evidence and the most recent.
For this, the investigators carried out their research on the following sites and
databases: Pubmed, Sciences Direct, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Tripdatabase and Cible
+.
Several research equations have allowed us to have satisfactory results. When the
results were too broad, the investigators restricted their search to meta-analyses and
systematic reviews. The following keywords were used: "Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire",
"dentistry", "sleep apnea", "child", "surveys and questionnaires", "sleep apnea,
obstructive", "diagnosis accuracy"
The most relevant articles that allowed them to establish the research question were
found on Pubmed and Sciences Direct. (appendix n°1) Concerning Google Scholar,
Tripdatabase and Cible +, the articles found were either already selected articles or
were not sufficiently targeted on the subject.
Agreement of the ethics committee
The study is a prospective observational study carried out within the Erasmus HUB site
and therefore required the approval of its ethics committee. The required documents were
introduced on the DycoFlow platform on August 31, 2022. They gave their agreement to
submit my request to the ethics committee on September 20, 2022. The Erasmus ethics
committee gave its agreement on September 9, 2022. December 2022.
Study methodology
I. Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The investigators decided to limit the study to children aged 2 to 8 years. Indeed,
interceptive orthodontic treatment must be performed before the 9th birthday to be reimbursed
if necessary. Moreover, if ENT surgery is necessary (tonsillectomy for example), it is
advantageous to perform it as soon as possible. quickly as possible to avoid the long-term
consequences of mouth breathing. The investigators also excluded patients whose parents did
not speak French.
I. Objective of the study
The study will therefore consist in comparing the results using on the one hand the PSQ only,
on the other hand the clinical examination and the anamnesis as well as the three together
and see if the results are comparable.
II. Realization of questionnaires
Concerning the anamnesis and the clinical examination, the investigators based themselves on
the recommendations given by the AAPD. Indeed, some studies have shown that the questionnaire
gives better results when combined with a clinical examination.
III. Data collection
The study took place within the Erasmus site HUB, at the Erasmus Medical Center (EMC) during
pediatric dentistry consultations.
The parents of the patients were approached from the beginning of the consultation in order
to integrate the study. Oral explanations concerning the purpose and conduct of the study
were given in addition to informed consent. In addition, the children also received
appropriate informed consent explaining the course of the study if the age and maturity of
the child permitted it.
The PSQ and the anamnesis are carried out during the consultation with the parent. Once the
consultation is over, the clinical examination is carried out with the consent of the child.
If the PSQ turned out to be positive, i.e. the child obtained a score equal to or greater
than 7 positive responses out of 22, a liaison letter was sent to refer the child to an ENT
specialist. The investigators also asked for an e-mail report of the consultation. This was
also the case for the anamnesis and the clinical examination.