Retrieval Practice for Word Learning for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children

Last updated: January 22, 2025
Sponsor: Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Hearing Loss

Speech Disorders

Hearing Impairment

Treatment

Feedback with massed trials

No feedback with massed trials

No feedback with spaced trials

Clinical Study ID

NCT05512000
221204
  • Ages 5-8
  • All Genders

Study Summary

This study is designed to advance the promising yet underutilized research on retrieval practice by evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of two key retrieval practice features (feedback and spacing). The study uses four single case adapted alternating treatments studies, each with four 5- to 8-year-old children who are deaf and hard of hearing to evaluate the effects of feedback and spacing on the efficiency of word learning and retention.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least minimal prelingual hearing loss

  • Standard scores of at least 70 for receptive and expressive vocabulary skills

  • English is only spoken language

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Below average nonverbal cognition

  • Uncorrected vision impairment

  • Evidence of severe motor impairment

Study Design

Total Participants: 16
Treatment Group(s): 5
Primary Treatment: Feedback with massed trials
Phase:
Study Start date:
February 05, 2023
Estimated Completion Date:
November 30, 2025

Study Description

The proposed research addresses a long-standing and important challenge of improving language skills of children who are deaf and hard of hearing, a historically under researched group. The study aims to leverage retrieval practice - an empirically validated intervention approach - for improving how efficiently children who are deaf and hard of hearing learn and retain new words. To advance the promising yet underutilized research on retrieval practice, the study completes the next logical step of evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of two key retrieval practice features: feedback and spacing. Feedback is predicted to result in more efficient learning because it focuses attention on unmastered material, prevents the illusion of success, and reduces repeated errors. Spacing trials are predicted to result in more efficient learning than massed trials because they require more effort with fewer cues provided. The study will accomplish these aims through four single case adapted alternating treatments design studies with sixteen 5- to 8- year-old children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Study innovations include the critical evaluation of retention and use of a multi-session intervention context. The knowledge gained will guide language intervention for children who are deaf and hard of hearing.

Connect with a study center

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee 37232
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.