Esthetic Crown Lengthening With Closed Piezoelectric in Comparison to Open Flap Approach

Last updated: July 28, 2022
Sponsor: Augusta University
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Smallpox

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT05478317
1807704
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

In this randomized clinical trial, the investigators are comparing two different approaches for Esthetic crown lengthening- a minimally invasive approach using piezoelectric (PZ) and a traditional open flap approach (OF).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a gummy smile due to APE (Type 1B) in two or more maxillary anteriorteeth
  • Patients with normal muscular efficiency of the upper lip
  • Patients with no vertical skeletal defects

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic condition that prevent periodontal surgery
  • Patients who smoke
  • Patients with previous periodontal surgery in the same area
  • Pregnant women

Study Design

Total Participants: 36
Study Start date:
May 18, 2022
Estimated Completion Date:
January 18, 2025

Study Description

The altered passive eruption is diagnosed when there is an excessive gingival display with short clinical crowns. Esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) is the most common surgical treatment of altered passive eruption. Traditional ECL involves osseous resection with gingivectomy or apical displaced gingiva. The amount of soft and hard tissue removal in this technique aims to provide a healthy and esthetically acceptable crown height. However, gingival tissue coronal rebound is one of the most noted post-operative complications of traditionally used techniques. On the other hand, surgical techniques that include flap reflection may cause more coronal displacement of the gingival margin. Hence, it is crucial to assess different surgical techniques to determine the most effective technique that gives the required outcomes with maximum patient satisfaction.

Piezoelectric bone surgery delivers high precision in resection, good tactile sensibility, and permits a selective cut of mineralized tissue while sparing soft tissue. Further, the minimally invasive technique (mECL) was suggested to reduce pain, post-op discomfort, and procedure duration, and to accelerate the healing process. The mECL technique conveys a potential alternative approach as a sutureless, atraumatic, and less invasive technique that has been shown to increase patient satisfaction and comfort. In addition, using piezoelectric for osseous resection in this closed approach increases the favorable surgical outcomes. However, the osseous resection in mECL may be incomplete and results in a coronal rebound on the gingival contour. In addition, osseous resection in this approach is very technique sensitive to avoid root damage and uneven bone resection. A few studies and even a fewer clinical trials evaluated the clinical outcome of mECL using piezoelectric for osseous resection (PZ). Hence, in this randomized clinical trial, gingival margin and bone crest stability will be evaluated after a minimally invasive approach using piezoelectric (PZ) and a traditional open flap approach (OF).

Connect with a study center

  • Augusta University-Dental College of Georgia

    Augusta, Georgia 30912
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.