Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder, which
is characterized by transient interruption of ventilation during sleep caused by complete or
partial collapse of the upper airway. Many risk factors are identified such as: male gender,
large neck circumference, smoking, excessive alcohol intake and high Body Mass Index (BMI).
The prevalence of OSAS in Saudi Arabia is about 4% and 1.8% in males and females,
respectively, and it is associated with many comorbidities like type 2 DM, ischemic heart
disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension and depression.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for
moderate to severe (OSA) as it works as a pneumatic splint of the collapsible airway and it
may induce anatomical and functional changes of the upper air way muscles. Treatment with
CPAP was reported to decrease daytime sleepiness, and improve the quality of life among sleep
apnea patients. However, its impact on other outcomes such as hypertension was modest but
clinically significant and it may has no impact on other major cardiovascular outcomes such
as cardiovascular mortality, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, transient ischemic attack or
hospitalization for heart failure even in patients with established coronary artery disease,
and the same result was seen in two recently published meta-analyses.
The widely used definition of acceptable adherence to the CPAP is 4 hours per night for more
than 70% of all monitored days or 5 days per week. However, this definition was based on
experts' opinion and the knowledge about human sleep. Many studies showed that the 4 hours
cut-off was the minimum required amount of time to gain significant improvement from CPAP use
and there was a linear dose response relationship with greater benefit observed with
increasing nightly use.
However, few studies conducted to assess the effect of CPAP withdrawal following long term
treatment of OSAS with conflicting results. The residual effects of CPAP after withdrawal has
been controversial in the medical literature. Although some studies suggest that there is
some form of reversibility associated with CPAP compliance which leads to improvement in
subjective and objective assessment of sleepiness, however, other reports revealed that CPAP
withdrawal is associated with a rapid recurrence of OSAS. Rossi et al reported that in 71% of
the study population, CPAP withdrawal for four nights was associated with relapse of OSA.
However, 10 % remained in remission after 2 weeks of treatment withdrawal. Moreover, we could
not find a study that evaluated an intermittent CPAP therapy after a long period of
adherence. However, Issa & Sullivan reported that after 2-3 month of daily CPAP use, patients
who use CPAP on intermittent 3-4 nights "on" and 2-3 nights "off were able to maintain good
day time function, which maybe a reflection of a less fragmented sleep, thus an adequately
controlled OSAS.
Nevertheless, the withdrawal of CPAP raises an ethical concern. However, several reports
support the relieve from this fear. Studies of Short-term CPAP withdrawal revealed that it
was not associated with any impairment of coronary endothelial function, or raise of stress
hormones and markers of vascular inflammation. In addition, the recent Australian and the
SAVE studies that were quoted before revealed no significant effect of CPAP on preventing
secondary cardiovascular diseases.