Varithena Versus Endothermal Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein (VERITAS)

Last updated: September 23, 2024
Sponsor: Boston Scientific Corporation
Overall Status: Terminated

Phase

4

Condition

Vascular Diseases

Varicose Veins

Occlusions

Treatment

FDA-approved Endothermal Ablation (ETA) systems

Varithena®

Clinical Study ID

NCT05312970
S2473
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to observe insights into the benefits of Varithena compared to Endothermal Ablation (ETA) in the treatment of the great saphenous vein.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18

  • Primary GSV incompetence, defined as reflux > 0.5 seconds on Duplex ultrasound in asingle limb (Note the contralateral limb can have varicosities or SVI ifintervention is not required within 3 months i.e. asymptomatic)

  • Failed conservative therapy (compression, diet, exercise, leg elevation)

  • CEAP Clinical Condition Classification C2 - C6

  • Vein diameter 5-10mm, inclusive

  • GSV treatable length > 10cm

  • Superficial venous disease manifest by clinical symptoms (rVCSS ≥ 4)

  • Able to comprehend and sign an informed consent document and complete written studyquestionnaires

  • Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up visits (7-days, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36-months post-procedure)

  • Willingness to comply with post-treatment compression protocol

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to polidocanol, xylocaine, or epinephrine

  • Deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 3 months prior to randomization orhypercoagulable disorder

  • Post thrombotic deep vein disease above the calf veins

  • Pregnancy or lactating (within 30 days of randomization)

  • Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease or ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) < 0.8

  • Previous treatment to targeted incompetent GSV or previous superficialthrombophlebitis in targeted GSV

  • Previous venous intervention in affected limb in past 3 months

  • Local aneurysmal GSV segments

  • Inability to walk unaided

  • Inability to wear post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings

  • Patients with clinically significant reflux of the small saphenous vein (SSV) oranterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV)

  • In the clinical judgement of the investigator, patient who will require ipsilateraldeep venous intervention within 3 months following randomized treatment

  • In the clinical judgement of the investigator, patient who will requirecontralateral venous intervention (superficial or deep) within 3 months followingrandomized treatment

  • Patient on therapeutic anticoagulants

  • Active malignancy

  • Life expectancy < 2 years

  • Documented COVID-19 infection currently or within 2 months prior to randomization

  • Enrollment in another clinical trial that could confound the endpoint within 3months prior to screening or within 3 months following enrollment

Study Design

Total Participants: 43
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: FDA-approved Endothermal Ablation (ETA) systems
Phase: 4
Study Start date:
February 10, 2023
Estimated Completion Date:
April 04, 2024

Study Description

To collect comparative evidence on patient reported outcomes of Varithena compared to ETA when used to treat the incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV). ETA will include either radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation according to the site's standard practice. To provide long term (1-year, 2-year, and 3-year) outcomes.

Connect with a study center

  • Vascular Care Connecticut

    Darien, Connecticut 06820
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Medstar Georgetown University Hospital

    Washington, District of Columbia 20057
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Cardiovascular Institute of the South

    Houma, Louisiana 70360
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Vein Healthcare Center

    South Portland, Maine 04106
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Englewood Hospital and Medical Center

    Englewood, New Jersey 07631
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York 10032
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Stony Brook University Hospital

    Stony Brook, New York 11794
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • UT Physicians Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

    Houston, Texas 77030
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Lake Washington Vascular

    Bellevue, Washington 98004
    United States

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.