Phase
Condition
Urinary Incontinence
Enuresis
Overactive Bladder
Treatment
Amber UI System
Clinical Study ID
Ages 18-75 Female
Study Summary
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion
Inclusion Criteria:
Female patients aged ≥ 18 years
Diagnosis of urinary incontinence, with on a 5-day voiding diary at least 1 dailyurgency episode and/or greater than or equal to 8 voids/day and/or by having aminimum of two involuntary leaking episodes in 72 hr
Duration of urinary incontinence symptom ≥ 6 months prior to the screening baselinevisit date
Failed or is not a candidate for more conservative treatment e.g. pelvic floormuscle therapy or biofeedback or behavioral modification
Failed or could not tolerate at least one (1) antimuscarinic or beta3-adrenoceptoragonist medication
Urodynamic testing (uroflowmetry, cystometry and pressure flow) completed within 12months prior to screening baseline visit date or is willing to have testing atscreening baseline visit
Cystoscopy test completed within 12 months prior to the screening baseline visitdate or is willing to have a test at screening baseline visit
Is willing and able to washout from OAB medications for at least 4 week prior tobeginning the baseline voiding diary
Ability and willingness to give informed consent including language constraints (seeabove)
Able to participate in all testing and follow-up clinic visits associated with studyprotocol
Capable of independently using the system components (after training) as describedin the Patient Manual
Mobile and able to use toilet without assistance
Exclusion
Exclusion Criteria:
General:
Patient is pregnant, breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant during the course ofthe study (pregnancy tests provided in schedule)
Patient is unwilling or unable to use contraception during sexual intercourse forthe duration of the study, and thereafter if implant remains in the longer term.
Any significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures,device operation, or likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints
Any psychiatric or personality disorder at the discretion of the study physician
Any neurological condition that may interfere with normal bladder function (e.g.,stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease; clinically significant peripheralneuropathy, or complete spinal cord injury)
Patient has uncontrolled type I or type II diabetes as defined by their routine careclinician or diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
Any history of any pelvic cancer
Patient has history of other non-pelvic neoplasia within 5 years prior to enrolment,except for a cancer that was determined to be local occurrence only, such as basalcell carcinoma, or is receiving or planning to receive anti-cancer oranti-angiogenic drugs
Patient has proven major autoimmune disease, e.g. scleroderma or immunodeficiency (including use of biologic immunomodulatory drugs at time of procedure)
Life expectancy of less than 1 year
Patient is a frail elderly and/or with notable clinical evidence of sarcopaenia
Patient is not suitable for the study as determined by their routine care physicianfor any other reason
Patient is enrolled in another interventional study excepting observational studies,e.g. SNM registries or in relation to disease (see below)
Patient participation in vigorous sporting activities where these cannot berestricted for a period of 6 weeks post-implantation.
Specific urological
Urinary tract mechanical obstruction such as urethral stricture
Current symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) or more than 3 UTIs in past year
Pure stress incontinence or mixed incontinence where the stress component overridesthe urge component
Interstitial cystitis or bladder pain syndrome as defined by either AUA or EAUguidelines
Suspected pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. In patients with co-existent symptomsof chronic pelvic pain and urinary incontinence, Nantes criteria will be used forscreening. Patients meeting essential criteria will be excluded from the study
Treatment of urinary symptoms with botulinum toxin therapy in the past 12 months
Prior attempt at pudendal nerve stimulation using an implanted lead
Treatment of urinary symptoms with tibial or sacral nerve stimulation in the past 3months (prior experience of either before this time is permitted provided noimplants remain in-situ)
Specific technical
Patient is significantly obese (defined as BMI ≥ 35) so as to limit electrode leadplacement using standard approaches
Skin, orthopaedic or neurological anatomical limitations that could preventsuccessful placement of the electrode lead
Knowledge of planned MRIs, diathermy, microwave exposure, high output ultrasonicexposure, or RF energy exposure
Implantable neurostimulator, pacemaker or defibrillator in situ (anywhere in bodyincluding sacral and tibial)
Subject with a documented history of allergic response to titanium, zirconia,polyurethane, epoxy, or silicone
Study Design
Connect with a study center
University Hospital Antwerp
Antwerp, 2650
BelgiumSite Not Available
Not the study for you?
Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.