Bare Platinum Coils Versus Second-generation Hydrocoils

Last updated: May 13, 2025
Sponsor: Seoul National University Hospital
Overall Status: Active - Not Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Aneurysm

Treatment

Coil embolization

Clinical Study ID

NCT04988503
B-2012/652-002
  • Ages > 19
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between bare platinum coil group and second-generation hydrogel coils for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 19 year old or older

  • untreated ruptured intracranial aneurysms with an anatomy such that endovasculartreatment with either bare platinum or second-generation hydrogel coils wasconsidered feasible.

  • person who agreed to study

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contrast allgery (+)

  • combined other intracranial lesions (tumor, moyamoya disease, cerebral vasculardiseases)

  • ineligible for coil embolization

Study Design

Total Participants: 118
Treatment Group(s): 1
Primary Treatment: Coil embolization
Phase:
Study Start date:
August 30, 2021
Estimated Completion Date:
December 31, 2025

Study Description

The investigators aimed to analyze whether the use of second-generation hydrogel coils for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms improves clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with the use of bare platinum coils.

Connect with a study center

  • Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital

    Sejong, Chungnam 30099
    Korea, Republic of

    Site Not Available

  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

    Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do 50612
    Korea, Republic of

    Site Not Available

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam-si, 13620
    Korea, Republic of

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.