About 40 million people have a communication disability (CD), which includes hearing, speech,
language, and voice disabilities. Compared to non-disabled patients, patients with CD are
more likely to have a greater number of chronic conditions, and have higher rates of asthma,
hypertension, emphysema, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and arthritis. Approximately one
third of people with CD report the quality of their health as fair/poor as compared to only
11% of patients without CD. Patients with CD are 2-4 times more likely to report difficulty
finding a provider than those without CD. When they do access care, they report that the
quality of care and communication they receive is low.
Communication strategies that patients with CD require may vary, and providers need to elicit
and then adapt to patients' preferences for communication strategies. Provider education and
patient-prompt tool interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in general populations.
Provider communication education significantly improves their patient-centered communication.
Patient-prompt tools empower patients to identify topics and communication styles they prefer
and then share this information with their healthcare provider. While provider education and
patient-prompt tools have been proven effective, their effectiveness has not been compared in
the primary care setting for patients with CD. Therefore, the aim of this study is to adapt
these two types of interventions for patients with CD in the primary care setting and then
compare their effectiveness at improving patient-reported health related quality of life and
experience with care.
In this study we will conduct a stepped-wedge randomized control trial design. The study will
take place at 4 sites that have unique contributions that will add to the generalizability
and dissemination of the results. They are diverse in their geographic location, include
academic and community clinics, represent urban and suburban locations, and include racially
and ethnically diverse patients. Eight clinics, 2 at each site, will be part of the trial.
All participating clinic sites will receive the healthcare team-directed intervention
(intervention A) and then will be randomized as to when they begin implementing the
patient-directed tool (intervention B). The A versus A+B study design ensures all
participating healthcare team members receive the training, as national policies require
healthcare team members receive training on effective communication with patients with CD. We
will randomize at the clinic-level cluster to eliminate spillover intervention effects
amongst providers within the same clinic.
Participating healthcare team members will all receive the healthcare team-directed
intervention (a general overview training about communication disabilities and communication
strategies that can be used with patients) during the month preceding trial roll-out. Clinics
will be randomized as to when they begin implementing the patient-directed tool, with a new
clinic beginning every two months. One month prior to implementation, the healthcare team
members will receive a booster education training, be introduced to the patient-directed
tool, and alerted that they will be handed the completed tool by patients with CD during the
patients' clinical encounters.
To measure patient and provider perceptions, both groups will complete a survey after the
clinical encounter. A subset of encounters will be videotaped, and content analysis will
document providers' use of patient-centered strategies and any adaptations made to the
intervention strategies. Chart review will document patients' healthcare utilization over
time. To understand providers' experiences with both interventions and perceptions of
feasibility, healthcare team members will participate in qualitative focus groups and
interviews at 3 time points.
The outcomes from this study may help create patient and provider training and tools that, if
proven successful, could be disseminated to other healthcare arenas to improve
patient-provider communication and ultimately improved health outcomes for this vulnerable
population.