Early Initiation of Oral Therapy With Cyclosporine and Eltrombopag for Treatment Naive Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA)

Last updated: March 13, 2025
Sponsor: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

2

Condition

Anemia

Aplastic Anemia

Treatment

Horse-Anti-thymocyte-Globulin

Cyclosporine

Eltrombopag

Clinical Study ID

NCT04304820
200033
20-H-0033
  • Ages 3-99
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Background:

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare and serious blood disorder. It causes the immune system to turn against bone marrow cells. Standard treatment for SSA is a combination of 3 drugs (Cyclosporine [CsA], Eltrombopag [EPAG], and horse anti-thymocyte globulin [h-ATG]). Researchers want to see if starting people at a lower dose of CsA with EPAG before giving them h-ATG is helpful.

Objective:

To learn if early initiation of oral therapy with CsA and EPAG is safe and effective in people who have SAA and have not been treated with a course of immunosuppressive therapy and EPAG.

Eligibility:

People ages 3 and older with SAA

Design:

Participants will be screened with:

medical history

physical exam

electrocardiogram

blood tests

family history

bone marrow biopsy

current medicines.

Participants may be screened remotely via telephone conference.

Participants will take a lower oral dose of CsA and EPAG. They will take CsA twice a day for 6 months. They will take EPAG for 6 months. Those who cannot visit the NIH Clinical Center within 72 hours will start taking the drugs at home. They will have weekly telephone calls with NIH staff until they visit the Clinical Center.

Participants may get h-ATG at the Clinical Center for 4 days. For this, they will have a central line placed. It is a plastic tube inserted into a neck, chest, or arm vein.

Participants will repeat most screening tests throughout the study.

Participants will have follow-up visits at the Clinical Center at 3 months, 6 months, and annually for 5 years after the start of the study....

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:
  1. Age >= 3 years old

  2. Weight >12Kg

  3. Severe aplastic anemia:

  • Bone marrow cellularity <30% (excluding lymphocytes) AND At least two of thefollowing:

  • Absolute neutrophil count <500/microliter

  • Platelet count <20,000/microliter

  • Absolute reticulocyte count <60,000/microliter

Exclusion

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Known diagnosis or high suspicion of Fanconi anemia or other constitutional marrowfailure syndrome

  2. Evidence of a clonal disorder on cytogenetics performed within 12 weeks of studyentry involving chromosome 7 or complex karyotype. Patient will not be excluded ifcytogenetics are not done or are pending

  3. A course of prior immunosuppressive therapy (ATG, cyclosporine, alemtuzumab, andhigh dose cyclophosphamide), or eltrombopag

  4. SGOT or SGPT >2.5 times the upper limit of normal or total bilirubin >1.5 x upperlimit of normal

  5. Subjects with liver cirrhosis (as determined by the investigator).

  6. Subjects with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who are not receivingantiretroviral therapy, have detectable HIV RNA viral load and have CD4 cell count <200/microliter, or are on anti-retroviral therapy that interacts with the studydrugs. subjects will not be excluded if HIV testing is pending or unavailable.

  7. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73m^2

  8. Hypersensitivity to EPAG or its components

  9. Infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy

  10. Moribund status or concurrent hepatic, renal, cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary,infectious, or metabolic disease of such severity that it would preclude thepatient's ability to tolerate protocol therapy, or that death within 7-10 days islikely

  11. Potential subjects with cancer who are on active chemotherapeutic treatment or whotake drugs with hematological effects will not be eligible

  12. Inability to understand the investigational nature of the study or to give informedconsent or does not have a legally authorized representative or surrogate that canprovide informed consent.

  13. Inability to swallow

  14. Unable to participate in audio/video telecommunication

  15. Inability to ship the study drug to participant

  16. History or current diagnosis of cardiac disease indicating significant risk ofsafety for patients participating in the study such as uncontrolled or significantcardiac disease, including any of the following: Recent myocardial infarction (within last 6 months), uncontrolled congestive heart failure, unstable angina (within last 6 months), clinically significant (symptomatic) cardiac arrhythmias (e.g., sustained ventricular tachycardia, and clinically significant second or thirddegree AV block without a pacemaker.), long QT syndrome, family history of idiopathic sudden death, congenital long QT syndrome oradditional risk factors for cardiac repolarization abnormality, as determined by theinvestigator.

  17. Impaired cardiac function, such as: Corrected QTc >450 msec using Fridericiacorrection (QTcF) on the screening ECG (using triplicate ECGs), other clinicallysignificant cardiovascular disease (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, history oflabile hypertension), history of known structural abnormalities (e.g.cardiomyopathy).

  18. Concurrent participation in an investigational study within 30 days prior toenrollment or within 5-half-lives of the investigational product, whichever islonger. Note: parallel enrollment in a disease registry is permitted.

  19. Known thrombophilic risk factors. Exception: Subjects for whom the potentialbenefits of participating in the study outweigh the potential risks ofthromboembolic events, as determined by the investigator.

  20. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable ofbecoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception duringdosing of study treatment. Basic contraception methods include:

  • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyleof the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal,post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception

  • Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or withouthysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or tubal ligation at least six weeks beforetaking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when thereproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone levelassessment

  • Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). The vasectomizedmale partner should be the sole partner for that subject

  • Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap. For the UK: withspermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/ vaginal suppository

  • Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception orplacement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), orother forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failurerate <1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormonecontraception.

  • In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on thesame pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.

  1. Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine B-humanchorionic gonadotrophin (B-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1

  2. Sexually active males unless they use a condom during intercourse while taking thedrug during treatment, and for 7 days after stopping treatment (and for anadditional 12 weeks [for genotoxic compounds]) and should not father a child in thisperiod. A condom is required to be used also by vasectomized men as well as duringintercourse with a male partner in order to prevent delivery of the drug via semen.

Study Design

Total Participants: 80
Treatment Group(s): 3
Primary Treatment: Horse-Anti-thymocyte-Globulin
Phase: 2
Study Start date:
May 07, 2020
Estimated Completion Date:
May 31, 2028

Study Description

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure characterized by pancytopenia and a hypocellular marrow. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is curative in younger patients, but older age and/or lack of a suitable donor have limited application of this procedure. As an alternative to transplant, immunosuppressive treatment (IST) has provided durable remissions and similar long term survival [1]. Approximately 2/3 of patients who receive IST with horse anti-thymocyte globulin (h-ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA) have blood count recovery, but 25-30% do not respond and 30-40% will relapse. A likely explanation for partial recovery and relapse is incomplete elimination of auto-reactive T cells and insufficient stem cell reserve.

Thrombopoietin (TPO) is a key regulator of hematopoietic stem cell renewal and survival. To improve the hematologic response rate, our group assessed the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG), a synthetic mimetic of TPO, to IST in treatment na(SqrRoot) ve SAA. This combination achieved a higher complete response rate to about 50% and an overall response rate to 80%, both superior to historic controls [2]. This regimen received FDA approval in November 2018. Combined therapy is now being tested in a European randomized study. Furthermore, protocols have been developed internationally to determine whether EPAG and CsA, without ATG, are sufficient to improve blood counts, in countries where ATG is not available.

The long-term complications, relapse and clonal evolution, were no worse with the addition of EPAG than in our historical cohort, but still remain a problem. Clonal evolution occurs in 10-15% of patients and is defined as development of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia with characteristic cytogenetic abnormalities of aneuploidy, especially monosomy 7 or deletion 7q. There are no predictive tools to identify patients at higher risk for either of these two long term events.

Because SAA is a rare disease, treatment has been recommended to take place at a specialized center. However, delays in reaching such centers and initiating therapy are common. From current understanding of the disease, immune destruction of cells is ongoing during this period, likely impacting on both short and long term outcomes. We propose early initiation of lower dose CsA (2mg/kg/day) and EPAG to decrease ongoing immune destruction and stimulate HSPC while awaiting full work up and transfer to the Clinical Center (CC).

The aim of this study is to test feasibility and safety of initiating oral therapy before arriving to the NIH, based on diagnostic tests performed by local physicians and interpretation from experts here. Treatment will be initiated remotely but under complete guidance and supervision of the research team at the Hematology Branch. All patients except the ones who achieve complete response will receive standard three drug regimen upon completion of work up here at the CC. Primary endpoint of the study will be to assess feasibility and safety as a composite measure of misdiagnosis, non-compliance with the regimen or failure to establish care at the Clinical Center within 8 weeks of initiating treatment, and TRSAE (treatment related serious adverse events). Initial treatment period

of 8 weeks may be extended in special circumstances. Secondary endpoints are response rates at landmark time points, relapse, overall survival, and clonal evolution.

Connect with a study center

  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

    Bethesda, Maryland 20892
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.