Using Counter Attitudinal Advocacy to Change Drinking Behavior

Last updated: October 21, 2024
Sponsor: Brown University
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

N/A

Condition

Alcohol Use Disorder

Alcohol Dependence

Substance Abuse

Treatment

Personalized Normative Feedback

Counter Attitudinal Advocacy

Clinical Study ID

NCT04042909
1809002214
R01AA025043
  • Ages 18-26
  • All Genders
  • Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Summary

High volume drinking by young adults has proven resistant to change, so new approaches are needed. We adapt a theory-based attitude change strategy for use in alcohol prevention. This research tests the impact of brief writing and advocacy activities on subsequent drinking and negative consequences.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-26

  • Male or female student at Brown University or University of Houston

  • Past month heavy episodic drinking (for men, >5 drinks in one day, for women >4drinks in one day)

  • At least two self-reported negative consequences from drinking in the past month

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • status as a second semester Senior

Study Design

Total Participants: 591
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Personalized Normative Feedback
Phase:
Study Start date:
November 12, 2019
Estimated Completion Date:
January 30, 2023

Study Description

The persistence of risky drinking among young adults in college calls for continued efforts to prevent harms related to alcohol. Many prevention interventions rely on a primary mechanism of change: correcting exaggerated drinking norms. We propose to test a novel prevention strategy targeting another mechanism of change: creating attitude-behavior dissonance. To date, attitude change activities have not been harnessed as a behavior change strategy for alcohol abuse prevention, so this study adapts counter-attitudinal advocacy (CAA) to the alcohol prevention context. The goals of the proposed research are to demonstrate (a) the utility of CAA to change high volume drinking and related consequences, (b) that attitude change and attitude-behavior dissonance mediates the CAA manipulation effect, and (c) that CAA-induced risk reduction is not inferior to an established intervention based on Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF). A pair of studies will be implemented across two sites. First surveys to document peer behaviors and normative perceptions (N = 500 at each site) will be conducted, in order to deliver accurate, campus-specific PNF. The next study consists of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 2 experimental conditions (CAA and PNF) and a 3rd assessment only control condition to determine the impact of CAA on alcohol outcomes. For the RCT, a total of 600 heavy drinking students who have endorsed alcohol-related negative consequences will be recruited. Alcohol outcomes will be assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups to test hypotheses that, relative to assessment only control, the CAA manipulation will decrease alcohol consumption and consequences. We will also test the hypothesis that CAA condition will be no less efficacious than (i.e., not inferior to) the PNF condition. The RCT also allows tests of hypotheses about effect moderators and mediators. This study will demonstrate the generalizability of CAA activities to the alcohol prevention context, as well as their generalizability across demographically different settings. Implications for the public health include establishing the efficacy of a new approach for reducing high volume drinking and related consequences among young adults.

Connect with a study center

  • Brown University

    Providence, Rhode Island 02912
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • University of Houston

    Houston, Texas 77204-5022
    United States

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.