To Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of Lucentis (Ranibizumab) 0.5mg Intravitreal Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME) With Well Controlled and Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus

Last updated: April 10, 2018
Sponsor: Marsden Eye Specialists
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Macular Edema

Diabetes And Hypertension

Diabetes Prevention

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT03495765
Control1
  • Ages > 21
  • All Genders
  • Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Summary

To demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of 12 months of Lucentis (ranibizumab) in patients with well controlled compared to those with poorly controlled diabetes using an PRN treatment schedule.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients with diabetes > 21 years of age who have signed an informedconsent

  • Patients with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus (according to ADA or WHOguidelines) with HbA1c levels either < 7.5% or ≥ 10.0% at screening (visit 1) asmeasured within the last 3 months.

  • Patients with visual impairment due to either focal or diffuse DME in at least one eyewho are eligible for laser treatment in the opinion of the investigator. The study eyemust fulfill the following criteria at Visit 1 (if both eyes are eligible, the studyeye will be selected by the investigator, based on potential for improvement): i) BCVAscore between 73 and 39 letters, inclusively, using LogMAR visual acuity testingcharts at 4 metres (or at the equivalent appropriate testing distance for the chartsize) (approximate Snellen equivalent between 6/12 (20/40) and 6/48 (20/160); ii) thedecrease in vision is due to DME but not due to other causes, in the opinion of theinvestigator

  • OCT foveal centre point thickness ≥ 350µm on Spectral Domain OCT (≥300 µm on Timedomain OCT / STRATUS)

  • Medication for the management of diabetes should have been stable within the 3 monthsprior to randomisation

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant conditions in the study eye which could, in the opinion of theinvestigator, prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment

  • Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in either eye

  • Any active infection (e.g. conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveitis,endophthalmitis) in either eye

  • History of uveitis in either eye

  • Structural damage within 1 disc diameter of the center of the macula in the study eyelikely to preclude an improvement in visual acuity following the resolution of macularoedema, including (geographic) atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, subretinalfibrosis, laser scar(s), or organized hard exudates plaques

  • Ocular disorders in the study eye that may confound interpretation of study results,compromise visual acuity or require medical or surgical intervention during the 12-month study period, including retinal vascular occlusion, retinal detachment,epiretinal membrane, macular hole, or choroidal neovascularization of any cause (e.g.,AMD, ocular histoplasmosis, or pathologic myopia)

  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (according to investigator's judgment)

  • Neovascularization of the iris in study eye

  • Evidence of vitreomacular traction in study eye, shown either clinically or on OCT

  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 6 months (in order toexclude patients with active proliferative disease) or focal/grid laserphotocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months prior to study entry

  • Treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs: pegaptanib sodium, anecortave acetate,bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept (VEGF-Trap) within 3 months to study eye

  • Intravitreal corticosteroids in either eye within 6 months prior to randomisation

  • Any intraocular surgery in the study eye within 3 months prior to randomisation

  • History of vitrectomy in study eye

  • Phakic study eye with a history of intravitreal corticosteroid treatment (due to thelikely late increase in secondary cataract)

  • Ocular conditions in the study eye that is likely to require chronic concomitanttherapy with topical ocular or systemically administered corticosteroids

  • History of disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinicallaboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition thatcontraindicates the use of an investigational drug, that might affect theinterpretation of the results of the study, or that would renders the patient at highrisk from treatment complications

  • Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant OR renal insufficiency withcreatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl

  • Untreated diabetes mellitus

  • Severe (blood pressure systolic > 160 mmHg OR diastolic > 100 mmHg)

  • Current use of or likely need for systemic medications known to be toxic to the lens,retina or optic nerve, including Deferoxamine, Chloroquine/ hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), Tamoxifen, Phenothiazines and Ethambutol

  • Known hypersensitivity to ranibizumab or any component of the ranibizumab formulation

  • Previous participation in any clinical studies of investigational drugs (excludingvitamins and minerals) within 1 month (or a period corresponding to 5 half-lives ofthe investigational drug, whatever is longer) prior to randomisation

  • Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable ofbecoming pregnant, including women whose career, lifestyle, or sexual orientationprecludes intercourse with a male partner and women whose partners have beensterilized by vasectomy or other means, UNLESS they are using two birth controlmethods. The two methods can be a double barrier method or a barrier method plus ahormonal method. Adequate barrier methods of contraception include: diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device (copper or hormonal), sponge or spermicide.Hormonal contraceptives include any marketed contraceptive agent that includes anestrogen and/or a progestational agent.

  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women.

  • Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures.

Study Design

Total Participants: 160
Study Start date:
March 01, 2011
Estimated Completion Date:
January 01, 2017

Study Description

To demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of Lucentis (ranibizumab) in patients with well controlled compared to those with poorly controlled diabetes.

The primary endpoint for the study will be the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to Month 12.

Two groups of patients, based on HbA1c levels will be entered into the trial -

  1. patients with a recent HbA1c level < 7.5 % (the 'well controlled' subgroup) and

  2. patients with a recent HbA1c level ≥ 10.0% (the 'poorly controlled' subgroup).

Ranibizumab treatment will be administered over the 12-month period, initial 3 monthly injections, followed by 'as needed' protocol using the following principles:

Monthly ranibizumab injections would be suspended when:

  • No further BCVA improvement from treatment at the last 2 consecutive follow up visits OR

  • BCVA letter score >84 (6/6) at the last 2 consecutive follow up visits

Monthly ranibizumab injections would be reinitiated when:

• Decrease in BCVA due to DME progression in the opinion of the investigator Laser treatment could also be administered from 3 months after study initiation, according to the investigators decision, in accordance with ETDRS guidelines, and at intervals of at least 3 months from the last treatment.

Visit schedule: Screening visit then monthly visits for 12 visits (total of 13 visits)

Connect with a study center

  • Marsden Eye Specialists

    Paramatta, New South Wales 2150
    Australia

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.