Ejaculatory Sparing Transurethral Incision Of The Prostate (ES-TUIP) Versus Conventional TUIP

Last updated: December 5, 2020
Sponsor: Mansoura University
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (Enlarged Prostate)

Pressure Ulcer

Prostate Disorders

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT03176017
HoLES-TUIP
  • Ages > 40
  • Male

Study Summary

In this study, Investigators planned to compare ejaculatory sparing and non-ejaculatory sparing (conventional) TUIP using both subjective and objective assessment tools for the degree of deobstruction.

Furthermore, the impact of both techniques on ejaculation and its secondary effect on orgasm perception and different domains of sexual function will be thoroughly assessed.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤3.
  • TRUS estimated prostate weight ≤ 35 grams.
  • Sexually interested and having continuous relationship with the same partner (interested).
  • Bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI ) ≥ 20 as per pressure flow study

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative sexual or ejaculatory disturbances or pelvic pain syndrome
  • Neurological disorders that can affect potency and ejaculation e.g. long standinguncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 (> 10 years), DM type 1, cerebral stroke,Parkinsonism
  • Urodynamic changes consistent with urethropathy or detrusor hypocontractility
  • Previous pelvic surgeries or radiotherapy

Study Design

Total Participants: 40
Study Start date:
October 01, 2020
Estimated Completion Date:
October 01, 2021

Connect with a study center

  • Urology and Nephrology Center

    Mansoura, Aldakahlia 35516
    Egypt

    Active - Recruiting

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.