Optimal Delay Time to Initiate Anticoagulation After Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation

Last updated: August 4, 2023
Sponsor: University of Texas at Austin
Overall Status: Active - Not Recruiting

Phase

3

Condition

Chest Pain

Cerebral Ischemia

Arrhythmia

Treatment

Time-To-Treatment Randomization

Clinical Study ID

NCT03021928
2017-09-0035
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Title:

Optimal Delay Time to Initiate Anticoagulation after Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation (START): a pragmatic, adaptive randomized clinical trial.

Primary Objective:

• To determine the optimal time to initiate anticoagulation with a Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) after ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To compare the rates of primary adverse outcomes in a per protocol analysis

  • To compare 30 day clinical outcomes by the modified Rankin scale among the time-to-treatment groups

  • To compare 90 day clinical outcomes by the modified Rankin scale among the time-to-treatment groups

  • To explore the optimal timing in subgroups of age, sex, outcome category, and NOAC choice

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. New disabling neurological deficit attributable to new ischemic stroke.
  2. Minimum lesion diameter of 1.5cm on qualifying imaging. If lesion not visible onimaging, NIHSS must be greater than 4.
  3. Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent).
  4. Not currently anticoagulated and/or will not be anticoagulated prior to starting theirNOAC at the randomized time of initiation (except for DVT prophylaxis). Note: Patients who had been taking an anticoagulant prior to their qualifying indexevent (for any reason) are eligible for START, assuming the drug is no longer having atherapeutic effect in the patient's system by 48 hours from stroke onset.
  5. Treating physician plans to anticoagulate with a FDA-approved novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC): apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban, or other FDA-approved NOAC.
  6. Qualifying brain CT or MRI scan < 48hr from stroke onset (time last known well). Ifpatient has been treated with thrombolytic or endovascular therapy for this stroke,then the qualifying scan is that which is performed after therapy to rule outclinically significant hemorrhagic transformation.
  7. Ability to randomize within 60 hours of symptom onset.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any clinical or imaging evidence of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage in theprevious 6 months. Note: Patients with hemorrhagic transformation of current or previous ischemic strokemay be included per Investigator's judgment. Sporadic microbleeds may be included perInvestigator's judgment. As a general recommendation, a cerebral microbleed isconsidered to be ≤ 5mm, but sometimes up to 10mm, in greatest diameter on gradientrecalled echo (GRE), or T2*, MRI sequences. Any blood visualized on a CT will beclassified as a macrobleed.
  2. Infarct volume (estimated) is greater than 50% of middle cerebral artery territory onqualifying scan. If the full extent of the lesion is not visible, any patient with aNIHSS > 23 must be excluded. Note: The lesion does not need to be restricted to the mCA, but if the lesion volumeis estimated to be greater than half of the mCA territory, the patient should beexcluded. Note: In non-EVT patients, any NIHSS following the index stroke may be used to qualifythe patient for START. For example, a patient that presents with a NIHSS of 10 whothen receives tPA and improves to a NIHSS of 2 is still eligible for START. Forpatients whom had endovascular therapy, the qualifying NIHSS assessment is that whichis obtained with their qualifying scan following therapy.
  3. Anticipated need for major surgery over the next 30 days that would require delay,discontinuation, or extended suspension of anticoagulant of more than 5 days.
  4. Symptomatic edema expected from size and location of ischemic stroke.
  5. Decreased level of consciousness present or expected.
  6. Life expectancy less than 90 days.
  7. Follow-up in person or by telephone for 90 days is not feasible.

Study Design

Total Participants: 200
Treatment Group(s): 1
Primary Treatment: Time-To-Treatment Randomization
Phase: 3
Study Start date:
June 14, 2017
Estimated Completion Date:
December 31, 2023

Study Description

Long-term oral anticoagulation is standard for secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib). However, there is limited data and no consensus on the timing of when to initiate anticoagulation therapy, and concern that starting too soon risks symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. These data are derived almost exclusively from heparins and Vitamin K antagonists (e.g.,warfarin). Now that NOACs have become the mainstay of stroke prophylaxis in AFib and have more rapid and consistent anticoagulation and fewer strokes (hemorrhagic especially), the question of optimal timing of NOAC initiation is of increasing importance.

The primary aim is to determine the time-to-treatment interval with the lowest associated risk for adverse events in the context of anticoagulation therapy with NOACs for acute stroke patients with non-valvular AFib. The question will be investigated with a prospective, adaptive, randomized, controlled "dose-exploration" trial with the time to treatment with NOAC therapy treated as the incremental "dose".

An adaptive, pragmatic trial will be performed that will not deviate from the treating physicians' usual practice except for randomizing the time to start the NOAC. Data collection will be limited to those fields necessary for the planned primary and secondary analyses.

The composite primary outcome event will be any of the following within 30 days of the index stroke: Ischemic Events (symptomatic ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) or Hemorrhagic Events (symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation of index ischemic stroke, other symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or major extracranial hemorrhage).

Four time-to-treatment intervals, i.e. study arms, between 2 and 14 days will be investigated: 72 (+/- 24) hours, 132 (+/- 12) hours, 228 (+/- 12) hours, and 324 (+/- 12) hours. An innovative adaptive design will be used which includes response adaptive randomization and modeling of ischemic and hemorrhagic outcome events. The ischemic and hemorrhagic events within the composite primary endpoint are modeled separately using their known monotonic property that the risk of an event increases (ischemic) or decreases (hemorrhage) as the time-to-treatment interval lengthens. Interim analysis will occur after 100 subjects are randomized and have the primary outcome, where the primary outcome will be analyzed and new randomization probabilities will be calculated to favor the arms that have a better risk-profile. Thereafter, interim analyses will occur after 50 subjects are randomized under the new randomization probabilities, and further new randomization probabilities will be calculated to favor the arms that have a better risk-profile.

Connect with a study center

  • Dell Seton Medical Center at The University of Texas

    Austin, Texas 78701
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Seton Medical Center Austin

    Austin, Texas 78705
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • St. David's Medical Center

    Austin, Texas 78705
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • CHI St. Joseph Health Regional Hospital

    Bryan, Texas 77802
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Baylor University Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas 75246
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Parkland Memorial Hospital

    Dallas, Texas 75235
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital

    Dallas, Texas 75231
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • UT Southwestern William P. Clements Hospital

    Dallas, Texas 75390
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • UT Southwestern Zale Lipshy University Hospital

    Dallas, Texas 75390
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Texas Tech University Health Science Center - El Paso University Medical Center

    El Paso, Texas 79905
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital

    Fort Worth, Texas 76104
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

    Houston, Texas 77030
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Seton Medical Center Hays

    Kyle, Texas 78640
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Seton Medical Center Williamson

    Round Rock, Texas 78665
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas 78229
    United States

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.