Sirolimus (Rapamune ) for Relapse Prevention in People With Severe Aplastic Anemia Responsive to Immunosuppressive Therapy

Last updated: September 16, 2026
Sponsor: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Overall Status: Active - Not Recruiting

Phase

2

Condition

Aplastic Anemia

Anemia

Treatment

Sirolimus

Clinical Study ID

NCT02979873
170019
17-H-0019
  • Ages 2-99
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Background:

People with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) do not make enough red and white blood cells, and/or platelets. Their body's immune system stops the bone marrow from making these cells. Immunosuppression (IST) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CSA) leads to better blood counts. But when cyclosporine is stopped, the disease may return in 1 in 3 people. The drug sirolimus (SRL) may help by suppressing the immune system to prevent the return of aplastic anemia.

Objective:

To evaluate and compare the usefulness of SRL in preventing aplastic anemia from returning after cyclosporine is stopped, compared with stopping cyclosporine alone.

Eligibility:

  1. People ages 2 and older with SAA who:

  2. Have responded to IST and continue to take cyclosporine

  3. Are not taking drugs with hematologic effects

Study Design:

Participants will be screened with:

• Medical history, physical exam, blood and urine tests, bone marrow biopsy and aspirate.

Participants will be randomly assigned to a group. All will stop cyclosporine. Group 1 will take sirolimus by mouth at the same time each day for 12 weeks with close monitoring. Group 2 will not receive the study drug but will be monitored closely (Observation arm).

Participants will have clinical tests for the first 3 months:

  • Weekly blood test Monthly fasting blood test

  • For group 1, measurements of sirolimus in the blood every 1-2 weeks

Participants will have clinic visits at 3 months, 12 months, and annually for 5 years after the study starts. They may have another visit if their SAA returns.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Age greater than or equal to 2 years old

  • Weight greater than 12 kg

  • Previous diagnosis of SAA by bone marrow biopsy and cytogenetics, treated withlymphodepleting therapy ATG, cyclophosphamide or alemtuzumab that includedcyclosporine. The lymphodepleting therapy must have been administered at least 12months prior.

  • Continuous treatment with cyclosporine for the previous 6 months (excluding minordose delays not exceeding more than 30 days).

  • Evidence of a hematologic response to an lymphodepletion-based regimen as evidenceof at least two of the following:

  • Absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 500/uL

  • Platelet count greater than or equal to 20,000/uL (without transfusion support)

  • Absolute reticulocyte count greater than or equal to 60,000/uL (or hemoglobin 10 gm/dL without transfusion support)

Exclusion

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Evidence of relapse of aplastic anemia due to cyclosporine withdrawal during theprevious 6 months.

  • Prior use of sirolimus or other mTOR inhibitor within 12 weeks of study entry

  • Myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia, according to WHO diagnosticcriteria (if baseline BM consistent with MDS after enrollment, patients will beconsidered ineligible and immediately exit the study, and the subject can bereplaced with another subject)

  • Patients that are on CYP3A4 inhibitors and cannot replace these medications withother equivalent medications for the period of study: protease inhibitors (ritonavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir), some macrolide antibiotics (clarithromycin, telithromycin, erythromycin), azole anti-fungals (fluconazole,itraconazole, ketoconazole), metroclopramide, felodipine, nifedipine, carbamazepine,phenobarbital, grapefruit juice and St. John's Wort.

  • Anaphylactic or hypersensitivity reaction to sirolimus

  • Patients with infections not adequately responding to appropriate therapy asevidenced by persistence of a clear source of infection that, in the view of theinvestigator, would preclude safe treatment with sirolimus.

  • Current pregnancy, or unwillingness to take oral contraceptives or use the barriermethods of birth control or practice abstinence to refrain from pregnancy if ofchildbearing potential during the course of the study 8. Lactating women, due to thepotentially harmful effects on the nursing child.

  • Patients who have received live vaccines within the past 30 days

  • Patients with cancer who are actively receiving chemotherapeutic treatment or whotake drugs with hematological effects such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (suchas eltrombopag), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor or erythroid stimulatingagents.

  • Moribund status such that death within 7 to 10 days is likely. Comorbidities of suchseverity that in the view of the Investigator it would likely preclude the patient'sability to tolerate sirolimus.

  • Inability to understand the investigational nature of the study or to give informedconsent or without a legally authorized representative or surrogate that can provideinformed consent.

Study Design

Total Participants: 84
Treatment Group(s): 1
Primary Treatment: Sirolimus
Phase: 2
Study Start date:
December 19, 2016
Estimated Completion Date:
June 30, 2030

Study Description

  • Most SAA ensues from immune-mediated destruction of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

  • Immunosuppression is the definitive treatment of patients with SAA who are not candidates for immediate hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

  • Horse ATG combined with the calcineurin inhibitor, CSA, remains standard as first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST).

  • Hematologic responses to transfusion independence occur in about two thirds of patients with standard IST and in 80-90% of patients treated with IST in combination with the growth factor eltrombopag.

  • About 30% to 40% of patients relapse after discontinuation of CSA. Many achieve disease control after the reinitiation of CSA, but remain CSA dependent indefinitely.

  • Evidence from mouse models of bone marrow failure indicates that conversion from cyclosporine to the mTOR inhibitor,SRL, results in immune tolerance which can endure the eventual withdrawal of SRL.

  • We hypothesize that CSA to SRL conversion will significantly decrease the relapse rate after immunosuppressive therapy for SAA.

  • This study will investigate the safety and efficacy of SRL for preventing relapse in patients -previously treated with IST who remain on CSA. The primary endpoint is rate of relapse at 2 years following conversion from CSA to SRL, versus stopping CSA.

  • Biological sampling of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates during treatment will be used to investigate changes to lymphocyte phenotypes and cytokine profiles.

Connect with a study center

  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

    Bethesda, Maryland 20892
    United States

    Site Not Available

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.