Treatment Tapering in JIA With Inactive Disease

Last updated: March 31, 2021
Sponsor: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Joint Injuries

Collagen Vascular Diseases

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT02840175
P 150902
2016-000312-15
  • Ages 2-17
  • All Genders

Study Summary

As biologic treatments are expensive and associated with some concerns regarding long-term safety, investigator hypothesize that early tapering and then withdrawal of biological agent, in an homogenous group of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis achieving inactive disease, is safe and not inferior to the maintenance of stable treatment intensity over 24 weeks. In addition, investigator also hypothesize that an earlier tapering of treatment is associated with a better quality-of-life and a general cost saving effect. MRP8/14 will be studied as a potential biomarker for the risk of relapse. A study for biologic agent, anti-biologic agent antibodies and a pharmacogenomic approach will complete the research, as pharmacokinetic study during withdrawal of biologic treatment are rare in children.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 2 to 17 years and treated with etanercept or tocilizumab or adalimumab,or patient aged 6 to 17 years and treated with abatacept.
  • Patient with an oligoarticular or polyarticular rheumatoid factor negative JIA
  • Patient treated with biologic treatment for persistent arthritis according to themarketing authorization.
  • Patient who achieved inactive disease within two years of treatment with the lastbiologic agent administered, according to Wallace criteria : no joints with activearthritis, no active uveitis (as defined by the SUN Working Group), ESR or CRP levelwithin normal limits in the laboratory where tested (or, if elevated, not attributableto JIA), physician's global assessment of disease activity score (< 10/100 visualanalogue scale), and duration of morning stiffness < ou = 15 minutes (within 7 daysbefore the visit).
  • Patient with inactive disease achieved for less than 12 months.
  • Patient with stable doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Methotrexate (maximum 20 mg/m2/week), and other non biologic DMARD for at least one month beforeinclusion
  • Patient without steroids or joint injection or live vaccines injection for at leastone month.
  • Signed informed consent by both parents (or legal guardian) and patient's agreement.
  • Patient affiliated to the National Health Assurance system.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with systemic form, rheumatoid factor positive, psoriatic or associated withenthesitis related JIA.
  • Patient undergoing biologic therapy due to JIA-associated uveitis or with activeuveitis at time of randomization.
  • Patient with any contraindication to continue ongoing biologic treatment, notablyongoing uncontrolled infection, suspicion or evidence of demyelinating disease of thecentral nervous system.
  • Patient previously treated with the same biotherapy for which dose decreasing orbiotherapy withdrawal was already tested in the past for inactive disease and thenreintroduced.
  • Pregnancy or absence of effective contraception (including abstinence) in a pubertalpatient.
  • Patient suffering from tuberculosis.
  • Patient with moderate to severe cardiac failure (NYHA class III / IV).

Study Design

Total Participants: 62
Study Start date:
May 18, 2017
Estimated Completion Date:
October 01, 2020

Study Description

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterized by chronic arthritis of unknown etiology starting before the age of 16. There are four to five thousand paediatric patients with JIA in France. Most of these patients are diagnosed with oligoarticular or rheumatoid factor negative polyarticular JIA. The prognosis of the disease has dramatically improved thanks to the introduction of biologic agents in patients with an extended oligoarticular or rheumatoid factor negative polyarticular JIA and inadequate response to methotrexate. Inactive disease and long-lasting clinical remission are achieved in most cases. "Treat to target" approaches are increasingly recommended, with earlier introduction of biologics, however the way to taper or withdraw treatment in patients achieving inactive disease is not codified. As biologic treatments are expensive and associated with some concerns regarding long-term safety, this study aim to test, in a randomized fashion, the hypothesis that early tapering of biologic agents (i.e. increasing the intervals between injections as soon as inactive disease is documented) is safe and non-inferior to the maintenance of stable treatment intensity over 24 weeks, and therefore test the possibility of early biologic agent withdrawal. It will also study concentrations of different biological agent, the occurrence of anti-drugs antibodies while tapering and then withdrawing biologics, and their possible association with a higher risk of relapse. In addition, investigators will test if the serum level of proteins 100 (MRP8/14) could be predictive of flares. Finally, pharmaco-economic analyses and quality of life studies will be conducted.

Connect with a study center

  • Necker Children's Hospital

    Paris, 75015
    France

    Site Not Available

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.