Neoadjuvant Treatment for Advanced Rectal Carcinoma

Last updated: October 12, 2023
Sponsor: UNICANCER
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Colon Cancer; Rectal Cancer

Colorectal Cancer

Digestive System Neoplasms

Treatment

25 Gy

50 Gy

Capecitabine

Clinical Study ID

NCT02551237
PRODIGE 42 GERICO12/UCGI
UC-0103/1503
2015-A01365-44
  • Ages > 75
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare pre-operative radio-chemotherapy (RT + capecitabine) to a short course RT associated with a delayed surgery, with two primary objectives: the efficacy evaluation (rate of R0 resection) and the preservation of autonomy (score IADL).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient ≥75 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤2
  • Adenocarcinoma of the rectum histologically proven
  • Tumor ≤12 cm from the anal margin, the measurement done by rigid rectoscopy or by subperitoneal MRI
  • Require a pre-operative treatment (tumor classified T3 or T4 resectable by MRI andtomodensitometry or T2 of the very low rectum)
  • Patient operable
  • No radiologically detectable metastases
  • Absolute Neutrophile count (ANC) ≥1500/mm³; Platelets ≥100 000/mm³ and Hemoglobin ≥10g/dL
  • Bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) andalanine aminotransferase (ALAT) ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), AlkalinePhosphatase ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Creatinine clearance ≥30 ml/min (Cockcroft and Gault)
  • Uracilemia < 16ng/mL
  • Public or private Health Insurance coverage
  • Patient has been informed and signed the informed consent document

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-resectable tumor
  • History of chronic diarrhea or an inflammatory disease of the colon or rectum, orintestinal obstruction or sub-obstruction
  • History of pelvic radiotherapy
  • Any active febrile infection or any other serious underlying pathology that mayprevent the patient from receiving the treatment
  • Significant Cardiovascular diseases such as, but not limited to: cardiovascular ormyocardial infarction ≤6 months before inclusion, congestive heart failure class II orhigher (NYHA), unstable angina, arrhythmia requiring medication or uncontrolledhypertension;
  • Significative cardiovascular conditions such as, but not limited to : Cardiacangioplasty or stenting, Myocardial infarction, Unstable angina, Coronary arterybypass graft surgery Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, Class III or IVcongestive heart failure, as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA),clinically significant irregular heartbeat requiring medication
  • Severe and unexpected reactions to fluoropyrimidine therapy
  • Any contra-indication to capecitabine and its excipients; patients with hereditaryproblems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactosemalabsorption should not included.
  • Uracilemia ≥ 16ng/mL
  • Any other concomitant cancer or history of cancer in the last 3 years, with theexception of the in situ cancer of the uterus, treated, or squamous-cell or basal-cellcarcinoma.
  • Patients already included in another therapeutic trail with an experimental molecule
  • Person deprived of liberty
  • Patient that for geographical, social and/or physical reasons will not be able tofollow the procedure as required by the protocol

Study Design

Total Participants: 103
Treatment Group(s): 3
Primary Treatment: 25 Gy
Phase: 3
Study Start date:
January 07, 2016
Estimated Completion Date:
June 30, 2022

Study Description

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers diagnosed in France. The average age of diagnosis in 2012 was 70 years old for men and 73 years for women, confirming that colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly population.

The literature concerning combined treatments of colorectal cancer in the elderly is extremely limited. The application of combined treatments in the geriatric population is associated with an increase in the therapeutic complications. These post-operative complications together with the comorbidities and age are unfavorable prognostic factors for survival in patients with cancer of the rectum; this explains why the improved results obtained during the last decades are perceptible in younger patients and not in the elderly.

In the general population, pre-operative radio-chemotherapy has imposed itself as a standard treatment for the cancer of the rectum locally advanced. The utilization of fluoropyrimidines associated with radiotherapy (RT) delivered in fractions [long course RT (50 Gy in 5 weeks), surgery planned 6 to 8 weeks later] increases the complete histological response rate and decreases significantly the rate of local relapse.

The short-course RT [short course RT using the Swedish model (5x5 Gy in 5 days), with the surgery programmed the following week] is the standard neoadjuvant protocol in an important number of countries and/or academic groups. The studies that have compared the fractioned RT scheme to the short-course RT protocols have not shown any evidence of a change in efficacy of the short course RT concerning the following criteria: rate of R0 resection, rate of sphincter conservation, rate of relapse at 3 years, the disease free survival or the overall survival. Similarly, there appears to be no difference in severe toxicities in the long term. It should however be noted that short-course RT followed by immediate surgery may be less efficient than combined treatment in patients with a distal T3 cancer, even though these conclusions published by Ngan have been criticized by certain. On the other hand, the fractioned combined treatments results in more tumor and stage reduction and thus more sterilization.

Nevertheless a retrospective analysis, performed in the Stockholm region, in patients irradiated with short-course protocol but operated with a delay of at least 4 weeks resulted in a sterilization rate of 8%. This result is even more interesting since in this cohort, 46% of the patients had a tumor classified T4 and that 38% of the patients had a primitive tumor considered inoperable.

In the elderly population, the neoadjuvant treatment has rarely been studied. An exploratory analysis of the PRODIGE 2 study, based on age as the criteria, has shown that pre-operative radio-chemotherapy is significantly more toxic in the elderly population, from 70 years of age. Globally the lower tolerance for the pre-operative radio-chemotherapy results in more frequent early termination of RT and a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients operated. Furthermore, if the type of surgery was not significantly different between patients <70 years and those ≥70 years, we observe a non-significant increase in the rate of prolonged stoma (patients amputated without closure of the stoma). These differences in the surgical procedures is also observed in other publications, placing the emphasis on the fact that in the absence of any difference in the clinical presentation or the characteristic of the tumor, the risk of real or supposed decompensation modifies the surgical care. These data, as well as those in the literature, provides evidence that the pre-operative radio-chemotherapy strategy followed by surgery, the standard strategy in younger patients, is associated with more side effects in the elderly, resulting in the benefit-risk balance, in this population, to be more questionable.

It is therefore necessary to conduct a specific studies in the elderly population, with cancer of the rectum with the objective to maintain the carcinological results obtained with classical radio-chemotherapy with at the same time better controlling the secondary effects of the treatment and the risk of decompensation of the patients: the short course radiotherapy associated with a delayed surgery may be a therapeutic scheme well adapted to this population.

The investigators therefore propose a study comparing pre-operative radio-chemotherapy (RT + capecitabine) to a short course RT associated with a delayed surgery, with two primary objectives: the efficacy evaluation (rate of R0 resection) and the preservation of autonomy (score IADL).

Connect with a study center

  • Centre Hospitalier d'Abbeville

    Abbeville,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Clinique Claude Bernard

    Albi,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHU Amiens Picardie

    Amiens,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Polyclinique Maymard

    Bastia,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais

    Beauvais, 60021
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHU de Besançon

    Besancon,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Cebtre Hospitalier de Blois

    Blois,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Hôpital Avicenne

    Bobigny,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Institut Bergonié

    Bordeaux,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre François Baclesse

    Caen,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHU Henri Mondor

    Créteil,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Hospitalier de Dax

    Dax,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHU DIJON (Hôpital du Bocage)

    Dijon,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Georges François Leclerc

    Dijon,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHIC des Alpes du Sud- site de Gap

    GAP,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHU de Grenoble Hôpital A Michallon

    Grenoble,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Hôpital Privé Sainte Marguerite

    Hyeres,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHD de Vendée

    La Roche-sur-yon,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique

    Levallois-perret,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges

    Limoges,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Léon Bérard

    Lyon,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz

    Lyon,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHU Timone

    Marseille,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Institut Paoli Calmettes

    Marseille,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre azuréen de cancérologie

    Mougins,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Hôpital Américain de Paris

    Neuilly-sur-seine,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne

    Nice,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Chu Caremeau

    Nimes,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Médical Oncogard Institut de cancérologie du Gard

    Nîmes,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Hôpital TENON

    Paris,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Pessac,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois

    Pringy,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Henri Becquerel

    Rouen,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Hôpital d'instruction des Armées

    Saint Mande,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Clinique Pasteur

    Toulouse,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

    Vandoeuvre Les Nancy,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris

    Villejuif,
    France

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.