AZELASTINE/FLUTICASONE (AZE/FLU) Nasal Spray on Symptom Control, Nasal Mediators and Nasal Hyperresponsiveness in Allergic Rhinitis (AR)

Last updated: December 2, 2015
Sponsor: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Overall Status: Trial Status Unknown

Phase

4

Condition

Common Cold

Allergy

Allergies & Asthma

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT02238353
azelastine/fluticasone AZE/FLU
  • Ages 18-60
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of intranasal MP29-02 (a novel formulation of azelastine and FP) has already been conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe seasonal AR. The combination formulation appeared to be superior in these patients with better symptomatic relief. However, objective analysis of the effect of this treatment on nasal mediators and/or nasal hyperreactivity has not yet been performed and would help in understanding the additional benefit of the combination treatment over monotherapy with nasal corticosteroids.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with an ARIA-based diagnosis of persistent moderate/severe AR (≥ 2 nasalsymptoms suggestive of allergic rhinitis and positive skin prick tests to house dustmite (HDM) (HAL Allergy, Leiden, The Netherlands) at screening. Patients withadditional seasonal pollen allergies may be included providing that they are includedoutside their individual pollen season, and with VAS score for total nasal symptoms ofmore than 5

  2. VAS for TNS of more than 5, and rT5SS of more than 8 at both screening andrandomization

  3. Age > 18 and < 60 years

  4. Eosinophilia of more than 5% in nasal secretions at screening

  5. Nasal hyperreactivity (drop of PNIF >20 %) at randomization

  6. Possibility to give reliable information and written informed consent

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any evidence of clinically relevant acute or chronic cardiovascular, pulmonary,hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, haematological, endocrine, metabolic, mental,neurological, or other disease at screening

  2. History of allergic reaction to fluticasone propionate, azelastine hydrochloride orone of the excipients (e.g. benzalkonium chloride, phenylethyl alcohol,microcrystalline cellulose)

  3. Patients with a change in vision or with a history of increased ocular pressure,glaucoma and/or cataracts

  4. Patients with tuberculosis, any type of untreated infection, or recent surgicaloperation or injury to the nose or mouth

  5. Patients on prolonged use of decongestive nose sprays, suffering from so-calledrhinitis medicamentosa

  6. Patients using other nasal or oral medication affecting nasal function, like nasalcorticosteroids, anticholinergics, cromoglycates, leukotriene antagonists, ACEinhibitors during the study or within the last 14 days before randomization; patientsusing oral corticosteroids during the last 30 days

  7. Patients using cytochrome P450 inhibitors (e.g. ritonavir)

  8. Nasal endoscopic evidence of rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis (NP) orstructural abnormalities such as clinically relevant septal deviation (septum reachingconcha inferior or lateral nasal wall) or septal perforation at screening

  9. Patients on immunotherapy (IT) for HDM or with history of IT for HDM

  10. Patients with a psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder of which the investigatorsfeel that this may compromise the ability to give truly informed consent forparticipation in this study or provide reliable information on the questionnaire

  11. Patients being enrolled in other clinical trials within the last 3 months

  12. Pregnancy or breastfeeding

  13. Malignancies or severe comorbidity

  14. Smoking

  15. Use of anticoagulation medication

Study Design

Total Participants: 45
Study Start date:
October 01, 2014
Estimated Completion Date:
December 31, 2015

Study Description

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of intranasal MP29-02 (a novel formulation of azelastine and FP) has already been conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe seasonal AR. The combination formulation appeared to be superior in these patients with better symptomatic relief. However, objective analysis of the effect of this treatment on nasal mediators and/or nasal hyperreactivity has not yet been performed and would help in understanding the additional benefit of the combination treatment over monotherapy with nasal corticosteroids.

Connect with a study center

  • Uz Leuven Dienst Nko

    Leuven, Vlaams Brabant 3000
    Belgium

    Active - Recruiting

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.