EndoVascular Treatment With Stent-retriever and/or Thromboaspiration vs. Best Medical Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Last updated: February 16, 2020
Sponsor: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Stroke

Occlusions

Thrombosis

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT02216643
22042613.6.1001.5327
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled, open, blinded-endpoint trial with a sequential design. The randomization employs a 1:1 ratio of mechanical thrombectomy with stentriever and/or Thromboaspiration versus medical management alone. Randomization will be done under a minimization process using age, baseline NIHSS, use of IV tpa, vessel occlusion site and hospital. To evaluate the hypothesis that mechanical thrombectomy is superior to medical management alone in achieving more favorable outcomes in the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days in subjects presenting with acute large vessel ischemic stroke <8 hours from symptom onset. Subjects are either ineligible for IV alteplase or have received IV alteplase therapy without recanalization. Sample size is projected to be 690 patients for a difference in treatment effect of 10%.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute ischemic stroke where patient is ineligible for IV thrombolytic treatment or thetreatment is contraindicated (e.g., subject presents beyond recommended time fromsymptom onset), or where patient has received IV thrombolytic therapy without clinicalimprovement.

  2. No significant pre-stroke functional disability (mRS ≤ 1)

  3. Baseline NIHSS score obtained prior to randomization must be equal or higher than 8points

  4. Age ≥18 years

  5. Occlusion (TICI 0-1) of the intracranial ICA (distal ICA or T occlusions) and/orMCA-M1 segment suitable for endovascular treatment, as evidenced by CTA, MRA orangiogram, with or without concomitant cervical carotid occlusion or stenosis.

  6. Patient treatable within eight hours of symptom onset. Symptoms onset is defined aspoint in time the patient was last seen well (at baseline). Treatment start is definedas groin puncture.

  7. Informed consent obtained from patient or acceptable patient surrogate

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulanttherapy with INR > 3.0

  2. Baseline platelet count < 30.000/µL

  3. Baseline blood glucose of < 50mg/dL or > 400mg/dl

  4. Severe, sustained hypertension (SBP > 185 mm Hg or DBP > 110 mm Hg) NOTE: If the bloodpressure can be successfully reduced and maintained at the acceptable level using AHAguidelines recommended medication (including iv antihypertensive drips), the patientcan be enrolled.

  5. Patients in coma (NIHSS item of consciousness >1) (Intubated patients for transfercould be randomized only in case an NIHSS is obtained by a neurologist priortransportation).

  6. Seizures at stroke onset which would preclude obtaining a baseline NIHSS

  7. Serious, advanced, or terminal illness with anticipated life expectancy of less thanone year.

  8. History of life threatening allergy (more than rash) to contrast medium

  9. Subjects who has received IV t-PA treatment beyond 4,5 hours from the beginning of thesymptoms

  10. Woman of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant or lactating or who has apositive pregnancy test on admission.

  11. Subject participating in a study involving an investigational drug or device thatwould impact this study.

  12. Cerebral vasculitis

  13. Patients with a pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confoundthe neurological or functional evaluations, mRS score at baseline must be ≤1. Thisexcludes patients who are severely demented, require constant assistance in a nursinghome type setting or who live at home but are not fully independent in activities ofdaily living (toileting, dressing, eating, cooking and preparing meals, etc.)

  14. Unlikely to be available for 90-day follow-up (e.g. no fixed home address, visitorfrom overseas).

  15. Hypodensity on CT or restricted diffusion amounting to an ASPECTS score of <6 on NCCT,or <5 on DWI MRI. The use of CTP or MRI perfusion is optional.

  16. Collaterals with malignant profile on CTA (without colateral circulation on CTA)

  17. CT or MR evidence of hemorrhage (the presence of GRE microbleeds is allowed).

  18. Significant mass effect with midline shift.

  19. Evidence of ipsilateral carotid occlusion, high grade stenosis or arterial dissectionin the extracranial or petrous segment of the internal carotid artery that cannot betreated or will prevent access to the intracranial clot or excessive tortuosity ofcervical vessels precluding device delivery/deployment

  20. Subjects with occlusions in multiple vascular territories (e.g., bilateral anteriorcirculation, or anterior/posterior circulation)

  21. Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningioma).

Study Design

Total Participants: 221
Study Start date:
February 08, 2017
Estimated Completion Date:
June 30, 2019

Study Description

Patients with acute ischemic stroke related to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion will be randomized up to 8 hours from symptoms onset in both arms (mechanical thrombectomy versus medical management alone). Subjects are either ineligible for IV alteplase or have received IV alteplase therapy without recanalization. They will be admitted at acute stroke units in Brazil (or ICU if needed) and treated following international guidelines. Concomitant medications and non-pharmacological therapies will be recorded. A maximum of six attempts to retrieve the thrombus in a single vessel can be made. No additional treatment will be allowed either with Intrarterial tPA, mechanical devices or angioplasty/stenting.

The primary endpoint will be distribution of the modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days (shift analysis) as evaluated by two separate assessors who are blinded to treatment

Interim Analysis The sample size for this Phase III Trial is projected to be 690 subjects. For interim analyses, the method of Lan and DeMets will be used to allocate alpha via the power family method with φ (phi) equal to 1 for the assessment of efficacy and futility, respectively after the first 174, 346 and 518 patients enrolled have completed the 90-day follow-up. The interval may be more frequent if requested by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). At interim analysis, in case the stopping boundaries are crossed the DSMB may recommend stopping the study either for better efficacy of the tested treatment either for futility. Other factors, such as safety, will be taken into consideration by the DSMB in the decision to stop the study. When considering stopping the trial for safety reasons, the DSMB will be instructed to consider both mortality (mRS=6) and severe dependency (mRS=5) at 3 months as one single outcome.

Connect with a study center

  • Hospital Geral Roberto Santos

    Salvador, Bahia
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital Geral de Fortaleza/SUS

    Fortaleza, Ceará
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal

    Brasília, DF
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital Estadual Central

    Vitória, Espírito Santo
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná

    Curitiba, Paraná
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital São José do Avaí

    Itaperuna, Rio De Janeiro
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90035903
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • UNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE EDUCAÇÃO E ASSISTENCIA, Hospital São Lucas PUCRS

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital Governador Celso Ramos

    Florianópolis, SC
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia

    São Paulo, SP
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Clinica Neurologica e Neurocirurgica de Joinville S/S Ltda

    Joinville, Santa Catarina
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu

    Botucatu, São Paulo
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital de Clínicas - UNICAMP

    Campinas, São Paulo
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital de Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto

    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP/EPM

    São Paulo,
    Brazil

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.