Fosaprepitant Versus Aprepitant in the Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting

Last updated: February 24, 2017
Sponsor: Gynecologic Oncology Associates
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

4

Condition

Pelvic Cancer

Vaginal Cancer

Uterine Disorders

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT01432015
GOA-NVM1
  • Ages > 18
  • Female

Study Summary

Nausea and vomiting are two of the more concerning adverse outcomes associated with chemotherapy in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. In fact, nearly 90% of cancer patients develop chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The successful control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is thus, of paramount importance in ensuring optimal treatment and sustaining a cancer patient's quality of life.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female Gender

  • Age > 18 years

  • A histologic diagnosis of stage III/IV gynecologic cancer (e.g., epithelial ovarian,fallopian tube, peritoneal cancer and uterine cancer).

  • Subjects who will be treated with Taxol and Carboplatin as standard of care for anewly diagnosed gynecological cancer.

  • Adequate bone marrow function as demonstrated by: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,500/μL; platelet count > 100,000/μL; and hemoglobin > 9g/dL • Adequate renal function demonstrated by: Serum creatinine of < 1.5 x ULN or 24-hrmeasured urine creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min for patients with serum creatinine > 1.5 xULN

• Adequate hepatic function demonstrated by: Total bilirubin of < 1.5 x ULN AST or ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN

  • EGOG status of < 2: Postoperatively, patients demonstrate an ECOG score of 1 or 2.However, during the first cycle of chemotherapy, the patients' performance statusimproves to < 1.

  • Projected life expectancy of at least 3 months

  • Ability to comply with the visit schedule and assessments required by the protocol

  • Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential

  • Signed, IRB approved informed consent and HIPPA consent

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancersof low malignant potential (borderline carcinomas) are not eligible.

  • Allergy or intolerance to 5HT3 or NK-1 antagonists and dexamethasone

  • An episode of vomiting or retching within 24 hours before the start of the initialtreatment with chemotherapy

  • Subjects with concomitant malignancy or a previous malignancy within the past three (3) years (except non-melanoma skin cancer)

  • Current, recent (within 4 weeks of the first infusion of this study), or plannedparticipation in an experimental drug study.

  • Screening clinical laboratory values of: ANC of <1500/DL Platelet count of <100,000/µL Total bilirubin of *1.5 mg/dL x ULN SGOT (AST) or SGPT (ALT) * 2.5 x ULN Serum creatinine of * 1.5 mg/dL Hemoglobin of * 9 gm/dL (may be transfused or receive a colony stimulating factor to maintain or exceed this level)

  • EGOG status of > 2

  • Gastrointestinal obstruction or an active peptic ulcer

  • Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding because aprepitant may be harmful to thedeveloping fetus and newborn

  • Known active HIV and viral hepatitis infections

  • Inability to comply with study

  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Grade II or greater congestive heart failure (seeAppendix D)

Study Design

Total Participants: 20
Study Start date:
September 01, 2011
Estimated Completion Date:
March 31, 2015

Study Description

Studies have indicated that oral and intravenous anti-emetics are equivalent with regard to efficacy; when evaluating cost and convenience, the intravenous route may be preferable. Fosaprepitant, a water-soluble phosphoryl prodrug for aprepitant, is converted to aprepitant via phosphatases following intravenous administration. Given the rapid conversion of fosaprepitant to the active form (i.e., aprepitant), the two medications appear to provide a similarly effective antiemetic impact. Clinical reports have additionally suggested that fosaprepitant could be appropriate as an intravenous alternative to the oral aprepitant.

Connect with a study center

  • Gynecologic Oncology Associates

    Newport Beach, California 92663
    United States

    Site Not Available

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.