The STREAM Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Anticoagulant Sub-study

Last updated: June 28, 2012
Sponsor: Robert Welsh
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Coronary Artery Disease

Heart Defect

Congestive Heart Failure

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT00882635
STREAMPCI
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Enoxaparin and Unfractionated Heparin in St Elevation Myocardial Infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age equal or greater than 18 years

  2. Onset of symptoms of STEMI < 3 hours prior to randomisation

  3. 12-lead ECG (ST elevation will be measured from the J point) indicative of an acuteSTEMI: >2 mm ST elevation across 2 contiguous precordial leads (best 2 of V1-V6) orleads I, AVL for a minimum combined total of >4 mm ST elevation,or >3 mm ST elevationin 2 contiguous inferior leads (best 2 of II, III, AVF) for a minimum combined totalof > 6 mm ST elevation.

  4. Informed consent received

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. PCI (1st balloon inflation) expected to commence < 60 minutes from diagnosis (qualifying ECG) or inability to arrive at the cardiac catheterization laboratory (1stballoon inflation) within 3 hours after randomisation.

  2. Anticipated or obvious problem with vascular access.

  3. Previous CABG

  4. Left bundle branch block or ventricular pacing.

  5. Patients with cardiogenic shock - Killip Class 4

  6. Patients with a body weight < 55 kg (known or estimated)

  7. Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as blood pressure measurement > 180/110 mm Hg (systolic BP > 180 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP > 110 mm Hg) confirmed on repeat measures (2 documented measurements at any time) prior to randomization.

  8. Known use oral anticoagulants (warfarin or coumadin) or GP IIb/IIIa antagonists withinthe preceding 7 days or recent administration of any IV or SC anticoagulation within 12 hours including: unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, and/or bivalirudin.

  9. Active bleeding, known bleeding diathesis/disorder including thrombocytopenia orclinical diagnosis associated with increased risk of bleeding including: known activepeptic ulceration and/or neoplasm with increased bleeding risk.

  10. Major surgery, biopsy of a parenchymal organ, or significant trauma within the past 2months (this includes any trauma associated with the current AMI)

  11. Any history of central nervous system abnormality (i.e. neoplasm, aneurysm,intracranial or spinal surgery) or recent trauma to the head or cranium (i.e <3months)

  12. Any known history of haemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin

  13. Ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in the preceding 6 months

  14. Prolonged or traumatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (> 10 minutes) within the past 2weeks

  15. Known acute pericarditis and/or subacute bacterial endocarditis

  16. Known acute pancreatitis or known severe hepatic dysfunction, including hepaticfailure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension (oesophageal varices) and active hepatitis

  17. Chronic dialysis or known renal insufficiency (prior S-creatinine >2.5 mg% (>220 µmol/l) for men and >2.0 mg% (>175 µmol/l)) for women

  18. Pregnancy or lactation or parturition within the previous 30 days; women ofchildbearing potential must be using a medically accepted method of birth control

  19. Previous enrolment in this study or treatment with an investigational drug or deviceunder another study protocol in the past 7 days

  20. Known hypersensitivity to tenecteplase, alteplase, ASA, clopidogrel, enoxaparin, or toany of the excipients or to the contrast media used in angiography Inability to followthe protocol and comply with follow-up requirements or any other reason that theinvestigator feels would place the patient at increased risk if the investigationaltherapy is initiated

Study Design

Total Participants: 44
Study Start date:
October 01, 2008
Estimated Completion Date:
June 30, 2012

Study Description

Past research in stable patients with coronary artery disease and those with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEMI) has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin as an anticoagulant strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention 1-3.

In patients with ST-elevations myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving pharmacological reperfusion (fibrinolysis), enoxaparin has been shown to be an attractive alternative to unfractionated heparin based upon past modest scale trials (HART-2, ENTIRE TIMI 23, ASSENT-3, ASSENT-3+)4-6. These results were definitively extended by the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial which compared fibrinolysis with unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin in 20,506 patients with STEMI 7. The primary endpoint of death and re-MI occurred in 9.9% of patients with enoxaparin and 12.0% of patients in the unfractionated heparin group (17% RR, p<0.001); major bleeding occurred in 2.1% and 1.4% respectively (p<0.001). This was achieved using a dose reduction strategy in the elderly (>75yrs) that omitted the intravenous enoxaparin bolus and decreased the subcutaneous injection to 0.75 mg/kg. After initial fibrinolysis, fewer patients underwent PCI through 30 days in the enoxaparin group versus the unfractionated heparin group (22.8% vs 24.2%, p=0.027). Among those who underwent PCI (n=4674) by 30 days the primary endpoint occurred in 10.7% with enoxaparin versus 13.8% unfractionated heparin randomization (0.77 RR, p<0.001); major bleeding was not different (1.4% vs. 1.6%, p=NS) 8.

Despite existing data in stable coronary artery disease, NSTEMI, and STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis there is limited data regarding the approach to anticoagulation therapy with enoxaparin in those STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Within a sub-study of the Which Early ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Therapy study (WEST) we undertook systematic anti-Xa sampling to address the adequacy of anticoagulation with an enoxaparin based regime9, 10. WEST patients undergoing primary PCI received aspirin, clopidogrel, and subcutaneous enoxaparin (1mg/kg) at the time of randomization. Subsequent administration of intravenous enoxaparin and abciximab at the time of PCI was encouraged. Those receiving supplemental intravenous enoxaparin (0.3 - 0.5 mg/kg) in addition to subcutaneous enoxaparin achieved anti-Xa levels > 0.5 units/ml (the proposed therapeutic concentration). Amongst those receiving 1 mg/kg of enoxaparin subcutaneous at randomization and 0.3 mg/kg intravenous enoxaparin at time of PCI, none had excessive anticoagulation (anti-Xa > 1.5 units/ml) suggesting that this may be an attractive dosing strategy.

Recently a non-randomized comparison of unfractionated heparin and enoxaparin within the FINNESSE study was presented in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Preliminary reports indicate superior outcomes amongst those receiving enoxaparin 0.5mg/kg intravenous as compared to unfractionated heparin intravenously.

The STREAM study provides a unique and important opportunity to acquire randomized safety and efficacy data on anticoagulation with enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Connect with a study center

  • University of Alberta Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7
    Canada

    Site Not Available

  • Southlake

    NewMarket, Ontario l3y 2P9
    Canada

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.