Palliative Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Dysphagia

Last updated: October 12, 2011
Sponsor: International Atomic Energy Agency
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Esophageal Cancer

Digestive System Neoplasms

Esophageal Disorders

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT00665197
E3.30.27
  • Ages 18-81
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Hypothesis: In the management of advanced oesophageal cancer, to determine if a shorter regime of external beam radiotherapy (using higher daily doses, and combined with intraluminal high dose rate brachytherapy) is not inferior in the palliation of dysphagia than a more protracted course of external beam radiotherapy (using lower daily doses and combined with equal intraluminal high dose rate brachytherapy).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Endoscopic and biopsy-proven carcinoma of the esophagus, either Adenocarcinoma orSquamous cell carcinoma;

  • Lesions of the thoracic oesophagus and the abdominal oesophagus but not involving thecardia of the stomach. (The oesophagus extends from the cricopharyngeus muscle at thelevel of the cricoid cartilage to the GEJ junction. The most proximate cervicaloesophagus extends approximately 2-3 cm distal to the cricopharyngeus muscleapproximately 18 cm from the incisors, and is excluded from this study; however theremaining oesophagus is included in this study, including the last 1-2 cm of theoesophagus which is intra-abdominal and up to the GEJ.);

  • Dysphagia immediately prior to the first HDR ILBT session (based on a 4-questionsummary score of 4-15 (i.e. less than a score of 16) using four of the questions fromthe EORTC QLQ OES-18 measure;

  • Able to insert the intra-esophageal applicator (Dilatation is allowed to open up thetumor/lumen to facilitate insertion, and this does not preclude eligibility. Anyoesophageal stent must be removed prior to brachytherapy because metal stents mayinappropriately increase the dose of radiation to the esophageal wall by approximately 10%.]);

  • Karnofsky is between 40 and 90, inclusive and at baseline (no patient can be 100 asall will have at least dysphagia from disease at baseline; patients with KPS <40 arenot eligible for this study);

  • Eligible for radiotherapy (e.g. any pacemaker is not within 2.5 cm of the outside ofthe field edge for the EBRT component of therapy);

  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18;

  • Patients suitable for curative treatment with either surgery or chemo-radiation;

  • Tracheo-esophageal fistula, or deep mucosal ulceration;

  • Perforation or massive esophageal bleeding ;

  • Previous treatment (e.g. chemotherapy, radiation therapy, laser therapy or surgery)for esophageal cancer (gastrostomy or PEG does not constitute exclusion criteria, andshould be considered for patients with complete obstruction or where there has beensubstantial loss in body weight prior to diagnosis);

  • Stents in situ (i.e. not removed prior to the first HDR ILBT);

  • Previous thoracic radiation therapy for any cause, either EBRT or ILBT;

  • Evidence of other uncontrolled malignancies, or evidence of synchronous head and neckor lung primary cancers (regardless of whether those malignancies could be managedwith curative intent);

  • Failure to complete all baseline assessments required for the study, includingpatient-elicited scores for symptoms and QOL;

  • Pregnant or lactating patients.

Study Design

Total Participants: 200
Study Start date:
February 01, 2007
Estimated Completion Date:
February 28, 2011

Study Description

This is a prospective, pragmatic and multi-centre clinical trial, without blinding or masking to the randomly assigned treatment. Patient registration and randomization are centralized. There are two arms to the study, expecting an equal numbers of patients randomized to each arm. Stratification will by according to: (1) treating institution/country, and (2) baseline Stage (M1 = distant metastases versus M0 = no distant metastases). The primary statistical analysis will be conducted as an "intention-to-treat" clinical trial.

A cost-effectiveness analysis is not required because the main contrast is between 5 and 10 fractions of EBRT, where 5 fractions are less expensive than 10 fractions. This protocol follows the recommendations of CONSORT for the reporting of non-inferiority and equivalence trials. The active control is 30 Gy in 10 fractions, and the new therapy is 20 Gy in 5 fractions.

Connect with a study center

  • Credit Valley Hospital Statistical Centre

    Credit Valley, Ontario L5M 2N1
    Canada

    Site Not Available

  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

    Beijing, Beijing 100021
    China

    Site Not Available

  • University of Zagreb Clinical Hospital

    Zagreb, 10000
    Croatia

    Site Not Available

  • Tata Memorial Hospital

    Mumbai, Parel 490 012
    India

    Site Not Available

  • Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Oncology

    Lahore, Punjab 54600
    Pakistan

    Site Not Available

  • University of the Witwatersrand Department of Radiat. Oncology

    Johannesburg, Parktown 2193
    South Africa

    Site Not Available

  • Mahidol University Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

    Bangkok, Siriraj 10700
    Thailand

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.