Safety and Efficacy of Gabapentin in Postherpetic Neuralgia

Last updated: February 21, 2012
Sponsor: Depomed
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Pain

Pain (Pediatric)

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT00636636
81-0062
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Gabapentin and pregabalin are treatments for some types of neuropathic pain, including postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, these treatments usually need to be taken 3 times a day for effective pain control. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new gabapentin tablet, which only needs to be taken once a day, is safe and effective for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men or women 18 years or older who have experienced pain for at least 6 months, butnot more than 5 years after the healing of a herpes zoster skin rash(typically about 4months after the rash first appears).

  2. Patient has a pain intensity score of at least 4 on the 11-point Numerical RatingScale (NRS). Patients should never be informed of the pain intensity criterion priorto screening or randomization.

  3. Patients of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test atscreening and a negative follow-up urine pregnancy test at randomization.

  4. Patient has a mean baseline week pain intensity score of at least 4 on the 11-pointNRS scale at the end of a 1-week baseline period and has completed at least 4 days ofdaily pain diary entries during the baseline week.

  5. Patients must have a minimum washout period of greater than 5 times the half-life ofthe drug of several medications.

  6. Patients currently treated with gabapentin pr pregabalin at screening may be eligiblefor the study, but must have a tapering period wherein the dose of gabapentin orpregabalin is reduced gradually over a period of 5 days followed by a two day washoutprior to the Baseline Week.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have previously not responded to treatment for PHN with gabapentin orpregabalin.

  2. Patients who previously experienced dose-limiting adverse effects that preventedtitration of gabapentin to an effective dose.

  3. Patient is a nursing mother.

  4. Patient has hypersensitivity to gabapentin.

  5. Patient has had neurolytic or neurosurgical treatment for PHN.

  6. Patient has severe pain from causes other than PHN.

  7. Patient has used injected anesthetics or steroids within 30 days of baseline.

  8. Patient has skin conditions in the area affected by the neuropathy that could altersensation.

  9. Patient is in an immunocompromised state.

  10. Patient has an estimated creatinine clearance less than 50 ml/min.

  11. Patient has had malignancy within past 2 years other than basal cell carcinoma.

  12. Patient has had gastric reduction surgery.

  13. Patient has severe chronic diarrhea, chronic constipation [unless attributed to drugsthat will be washed out], uncontrolled irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or unexplainedweight loss.

  14. Patient has any abnormal chemistry or hematology results that are deemed by theinvestigator to be clinically significant.

  15. Patient has a history of substance abuse within the past year.

  16. Patient has a history of seizure (except for infantile febrile seizure) or is at riskof seizure due to head trauma.

  17. Patient has a history of chronic hepatitis B or C, hepatitis within the past 3 months,or HIV infection.

  18. Patient has any other clinically significant medical or psychological condition that,in the opinion of the Investigator would jeopardize the safety of the patient oraffect the validity of the study results.

  19. Continuing use of any concomitant medication excluded by Inclusion Criterion 5.

  20. Patient has participated in a clinical trial of an investigational drug or devicewithin 30 days of the screening visit.

Study Design

Total Participants: 452
Study Start date:
March 01, 2008
Estimated Completion Date:
September 30, 2009

Study Description

The primary study objective is to assess the relative efficacy of G-ER dosed once daily (1800 mg following the evening meal), versus placebo in reducing the mean daily pain score from the baseline week to the end of the efficacy treatment period (Treatment Week 10) in patients with PHN.

Secondary efficacy measures will include changes from baseline in mean weekly sleep interference scores, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and Investigator-Rated Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC).

Connect with a study center

  • Buenos Aires,
    Argentina

    Site Not Available

  • All over Russia,
    Russian Federation

    Site Not Available

  • St. Petersburg,
    Russian Federation

    Site Not Available

  • Birmingham, Alabama
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Phoenix, Arizona
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Little Rock, Arkansas
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Lancaster, California
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Los Angeles, California
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Pismo Beach, California
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Colorado Springs, Colorado
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Pueblo, Colorado
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Daytona Beach, Florida
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Naples, Florida
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • New Port Richey, Florida
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Orlando, Florida
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Tampa, Florida
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Marietta, Georgia
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Honolulu, Hawaii
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Elk Grove Village, Illinois
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Shreveport, Louisiana
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • West Yarmouth, Massachusetts
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Ann Arbor, Michigan
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Florissant, Missouri
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Jefferson City, Missouri
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Albuquerque, New Mexico
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • High Point, North Carolina
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Bismarck, North Dakota
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Fargo, North Dakota
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Canton, Ohio
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Cincinnati, Ohio
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Kettering, Ohio
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Warwick, Rhode Island
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Pelzer, South Carolina
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Tullahoma, Tennessee
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Austin, Texas
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Longview, Texas
    United States

    Site Not Available

  • Spokane, Washington
    United States

    Site Not Available

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.