Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Pallidal (GPi) in Patients With Tardive Dystonia

Last updated: March 3, 2009
Sponsor: Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Overall Status: Trial Status Unknown

Phase

2

Condition

Tardive Dyskinesia

Parkinson's Disease

Essential Tremor

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT00331669
DBS and tardive dystonia
  • Ages 18-75
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this randomized, double blind, multi-center study is to assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with tardive dystonia.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Operational criteria for tardive dystonia for > 18 months after cessation ofneuroleptic exposure

  • 18-75 years

  • Relevant functional impairment in daily living activities

  • BFMDRS > 8 or AIMS > 16

  • Informed written consent

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PANNS >60 (Schizophrenia)

  • Hamilton-Score > 18 (Depression)

  • MATTIS-Score <120 (Dementia)

  • Preceding stereotactic neurosurgery

  • Pronounced brain atrophy

  • Increased bleeding risk

  • Decreased immune status

  • Botulinum Toxin treatment within the last 3 months

Study Design

Total Participants: 24
Study Start date:
May 01, 2006
Estimated Completion Date:
December 31, 2010

Study Description

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been established as a new reversible, neurosurgical therapeutic option for patients suffering from disabling neurological movement disorders such as essential tremor and Parkinson´s disease. Recently, deep brain stimulation has been successfully applied in patients with primary generalized and segmental dystonia. Additionally, a number of case reports suggest that pallidal deep brain stimulation may also improve tardive dystonia, which may for instance result from the intake of neuroleptics and which is notoriously difficult to treat medically. The present study will investigate the effects of pallidal DBS using a double blind, randomized design (sham- versus verum-stimulation within a 3-months interval post implantation of the electrodes).

Initially 60 patients had been calculated in a power analysis to assess significant results based on an average improvement of dystonic symptoms of 30%. However, in a recent study (Damier et al., Archives of General Psychiatry, 2007), 10 out of 10 showed a successful outcome of approximately 50% decrease on the extrapyramidal symptoms rating scale score. The exact one- sided lower 95% confidence limit would be 0.794 for this result. If such an approach is chosen for sample size estimation with 18 verum and 18 placebo patients one would obtain a power of 82% against a placebo effect of 30% success rate. For a placebo effect of 25% one needs 16+16 patients and for the placebo effect of 20% one needs 12+12 patients. We thus decided to reduce the sample size to 36- 32- 24 patients. It is expected that the continuous primary outcome measure will preserve even higher power than the binary one used in the study mentioned above. The local ethical committee has approved this.

Connect with a study center

  • Andreas Kupsch

    Berlin, 13353
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.