Efficacy Study of Adding Chemotherapy to Radiotherapy for Treating Bladder Cancer.

Last updated: July 10, 2017
Sponsor: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG)
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Bladder Cancer

Urothelial Cancer

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT00330499
TROG 02.03
NHMRC 243100
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to define the optimal management of localised transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary bladder. The main objective is to evaluate whether chemoradiation is superior to radiotherapy alone.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven TCC of the urinary bladder. Mixed tumours comprisingpredominantly TCC and elements of squamous or adenomatous metaplasia or carcinoma arealso eligible.

  • Clinically and radiologically localised T2, T3 or T4a non-bulky disease (<= 7cm inmaximum dimension), N0, M0. If radiological evaluation of a lymph node is interpreted as "positive" this must beevaluated further by either lymph node sampling or percutaneous needle biopsy. Patientswith histologically confirmed lymph node metastases will not be eligible.

  • Maximal TUR. N.B. Previous:

  1. partial cystectomy;

  2. endoscopic resection of bladder tumour/s;

  3. intravesical chemotherapy; or

  4. intravesical BCG does not exclude the patient from being eligible. However, the patient should have anadequate functioning bladder (this should be clarified with the referring Urologist and ifneed be voiding volumes should be measured).

  • Creatinine clearance >= 50ml/minute by calculation or measurement.

  • A white blood cell count >= 3.5 x 10^9/L with an absolute neutrophil count >= 1.5 x 10^9/L and a platelet count >= 100 x 10^9/L.

  • ECOG status of 0, 1 or 2.

  • No age limit applies provided the patient is mentally, physically and geographicallycapable of undergoing treatment and follow-up.

  • No significant intercurrent morbidity.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pure squamous carcinomas or adenocarcinomas.

  • Extensive or multifocal CIS change in the bladder.

  • T3 or T4a tumours unsuitable for curative treatment (i.e. > 7cm in any dimension),T4b, node positive and metastatic disease.

  • Presence of ureteric obstruction due to tumour infiltration at the UO not amenable tostenting.

  • Previous radiation treatment to the pelvis.

  • Previous significant pelvic surgery.

  • Significant bowel or gynaecological inflammatory disease.

  • Creatinine clearance < 50ml/minute by calculation or measurement. A white blood cellcount < 3.5 x 10^9/L with an absolute neutrophil count < 1.5 x 10^9L and/or a plateletcount < 100 x 10^9/L.

  • Other considerations making patient unfit for Cisplatin therapy.

  • Prior or concurrent malignancy of any other site unless disease-free for greater than 5 years, except for:

  1. non-melanoma skin cancer, and/or

  2. (a) Stage T1 well differentiated prostatic carcinoma in men, and In situcarcinoma of the cervix in women.

  • Bladder tumour - biopsy only. These patients must be referred back for more adequateresections or else should not be included

Study Design

Total Participants: 67
Study Start date:
October 01, 2002
Estimated Completion Date:
February 28, 2010

Study Description

Whilst concurrent chemo-radiation is increasingly being looked upon as the treatment of choice for patients referred for bladder preservation, the study by the NCI of Canada (Coppin CM, Gospodarowicz MK et al.Improved Local Control of Invasive Bladder Cancer by Concurrent Cisplatin and Pre-operative or Definitive Radiation.J. of Clinical Oncol. 14(11): 2901-2907, 1996) is the only randomised trial to show some superiority of concurrent Cisplatin and radiation treatment over radiation alone in increasing pelvic tumour control. There was no impact on overall survival. However, this study had relatively small subject numbers and included two distinct treatment options. In one group the patients were treated with a bladder sparing approach and in the other by pre-operative therapy and cystectomy with the type of definitive treatment being decided upon by both the treating Specialist and patient. At 5 years the pelvic failure rates in the radiation alone and chemo-radiation arms were 59% and 40% respectively. With half of the patients in each group having had planned cystectomy as part of their treatment regimen, the above rates of local relapse (especially in the chemo-radiation arm) are disappointing.

Given the concerns with the above study, and the continuing paucity of randomised phase III studies comparing chemo-radiation with radiation alone, there lies an opportunity for Australasian centres to take up the challenge. For this study, the proposed schedule for the chemo-radiation arm is to be the same as that being investigated in our previous phase II study (six weekly doses of Cisplatin plus radiation to a dose of 64Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 weeks). This will be compared with radical radiation alone (64Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 weeks).

Connect with a study center

  • Liverpool Hospital

    Liverpool, New South Wales 1871
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Calvary Mater Newcastle

    Newcastle, New South Wales 2298
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Nepean Cancer Care Centre

    Penrith, New South Wales 2751
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Randwick, New South Wales 2031
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Westmead Hospital

    Wentworthville, New South Wales 2145
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Mater Centre - South Brisbane

    Brisbane, Queensland 4120
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Townsville Hospital

    Douglas, Queensland 4814
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Royal Brisbane Hospital

    Herston, Queensland 4029
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • East Coast Cancer Centre

    Tugun, Queensland 4224
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Royal Adelaide Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia 5000
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Launceston General Hospital

    Launceston, Tasmania 7250
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

    East Melbourne, Victoria 3002
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Andrew Love Cancer Care Centre, Geelong Hospital

    Geelong, Victoria 3220
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Alfred Hospital

    Prahran, Victoria 3181
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

    Nedlands, Western Australia 6009
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Royal Perth Hospital

    Perth, Western Australia 6000
    Australia

    Site Not Available

  • Auckland Hospital

    Auckland, 1001
    New Zealand

    Site Not Available

  • Christchurch Hospital

    Christchurch, 4710
    New Zealand

    Site Not Available

  • Dunedin Hospital

    Dunedin,
    New Zealand

    Site Not Available

  • Palmerston North Hospital

    Palmerston North,
    New Zealand

    Site Not Available

  • Wellington Hospital

    Wellington, 7902
    New Zealand

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.