Grass Pollen Immunotherapy Using a Cluster Regime for Seasonal Rhinitis and Asthma

Last updated: September 13, 2023
Sponsor: Imperial College London
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

3

Condition

Common Cold

Allergy

Nasal Obstruction

Treatment

Venepuncture: 20 ml blood sample taken on 2 separate visits

Subcutaneous Alutard SQ grass pollen (Phleum pratense)

Clinical Study ID

NCT00135642
DHRG-CLUSTER
  • Ages 18-60
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of grass pollen immunotherapy on symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and quality of life in seasonal rhinitis and asthma. Hay fever symptoms and medication use, health-related quality of life, and measurements of non-specific bronchial responsiveness were recorded during the study period.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female 18-60 years of age
  • Written informed consent obtained before entering the trial
  • A clinical history of grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis of two yearsor more requiring treatment during the grass pollen season
  • A clinical history of severe rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (interfering with usualdaily activities or sleep), which remain troublesome despite treatment withanti-allergic drugs during the grass pollen season
  • Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT) response (wheal diameter ≥ 5 mm) to Phleum pratense
  • Positive specific IgE against Phleum pratense (≥ IgE Class 2)
  • Physical examination with no clinically relevant findings
  • If pre-menopausal female of childbearing potential, the subject must test negative onstandard urine pregnancy test and must be willing to practice appropriatecontraceptive methods for the duration of the trial
  • Patients with seasonal asthma only if their baseline methacholine PC20 was greaterthan 2 mg/mL (normal range > 16 mg/ mL)
  • Willingness to comply with this protocol

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • FEV1 < 70% of predicted value
  • A clinical history of symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma due to treepollen or weed pollen adjacent to the start of - and potentially overlapping - thegrass pollen season
  • A clinical history of significant symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis and/orasthma caused by an allergen to which the subject is regularly exposed
  • A clinical history of significant recurrent acute sinusitis (defined as 2 episodes peryear for the last two years all of which required antibiotic treatment) or chronicsinusitis
  • At randomisation, current symptoms of, or treatment for, upper respiratory tractinfection, acute sinusitis, acute otitis media or other relevant infectious process (serous otitis media is not an exclusion criterion)
  • History of emergency visit or admission for asthma in the previous 12 months
  • Use of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening
  • Previous treatment by immunotherapy with grass pollen allergen or any other allergenwithin the previous 5 years
  • History of anaphylaxis, including anaphylactic food allergy, bee venom anaphylaxis,exercise anaphylaxis or drug induced anaphylaxis
  • History of angioedema
  • Any of the following underlying conditions known or suspected to be present:
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Malignancy
  • Insulin-dependent diabetes
  • Malabsorption or malnutrition
  • Renal or hepatic insufficiency
  • Chronic infection
  • Drug dependency or alcoholism
  • Ischemic heart disease or angina requiring current daily medication or with anyevidence of disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation ofthe protocol results difficult or jeopardising the safety of the subject (e.g.clinically significant cardiovascular, serious immunopathologic, immunodeficiencywhether acquired or not, hepatic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, or othermajor systemic disease)
  • Immunosuppressive treatment
  • History of hypersensitivity to the excipients of the trial medications
  • History of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to trial medications or rescuemedications
  • A mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope andpossible consequences of the trial, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude
  • Unlikely to be able to complete the trial, for any reason, or likely to travel forextended periods of time during the grass pollen season

Study Design

Total Participants: 44
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Venepuncture: 20 ml blood sample taken on 2 separate visits
Phase: 3
Study Start date:
February 01, 1996
Estimated Completion Date:
October 31, 1998

Study Description

This was a single centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The main aim of this study was to assess the effects of grass pollen immunotherapy on symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and quality of life in seasonal rhinitis and asthma. Forty-four patients with severe summer hay fever (of whom 36 reported seasonal chest symptoms and 28 had seasonal bronchial hyperresponsiveness) participated in a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. After symptom monitoring for one summer, participants matched placebo injections (n=22) in a rapid up-dosing cluster regimen for 4 weeks, followed by monthly injections for 2 years. Outcome measures included hay fever symptoms and medication use, health-related quality of life, and measurements of non-specific bronchial responsiveness.

Results: Significant reductions were observed in immunotherapy group compared with the placebo group in hay fever symptoms (49%, 15%: P = 0.1), medication scores (80%, 18%; P=.007), and seasonal chest symptoms (90%, 11%; P < .05). Impairment of overall quality of life (mean score of 7 domains) during the pollen season was less in the immunotherapy group than in the placebo group (median difference [95% CI], 0.8 [0.18-1.5]; P=.05=2]. During the pollen season, there was no change in airway methacholine PC20 (provocation concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1) in the immunotherapy-treated group (P=5), compared with an almost 3 doubling-dose decrease in the placebo-treated group (P=.5), compared with an almost 3 doubling dose decrease in the placebo-treated group (P=.01, between-group difference). There were no significant local or systemic side effects during the study.

Conclusion: Grass pollen immunotherapy improves quality of life in seasonal allergic rhinitis and reduces seasonal asthma symptoms and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Note: Ongoing mechanistic studies and nasal biopsies studies until 2008

Connect with a study center

  • Royal Brompton Hospital, NHLI Imperial College

    London, SW3 6LY
    United Kingdom

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.