Search Medical Condition
Please enter condition
Please choose location from dropdown

Hazelton, Pennsylvania Clinical Trials

A listing of Hazelton, Pennsylvania clinical trials actively recruiting patient volunteers.

RESULTS

Found (76) clinical trials

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Atezolizumab in Treating Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer and Deficient DNA Mismatch Repair

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether atezolizumab combined with oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) and its continuation as monotherapy can significantly improve disease-free survival (DFS) compared to FOLFOX alone in patients with stage III colon cancers and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether atezolizumab ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Naloxegol in Treating Patients With Stage IIIB-IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine feasibility and safety of long-term administration of two doses of a peripheral opioid receptor antagonist in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line systemic therapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To explore whether patients randomized to one or both of the two study drug ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Immunotherapy (Nivolumab or Brentuximab Vedotin) Plus Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage III-IV Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma randomized to N-AVD (nivolumab, doxorubicin hydrochloride [doxorubicin], vinblastine sulfate [vinblastine], dacarbazine) versus that obtained with BV-AVD (brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival (OS) in patients ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Firstline Pembrolizumab Alone or in Combination With Pemetrexed and Carboplatin in Induction/Maintenance or Postprogression in Treating Patients With Stage IV Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in each of the 2 experimental arms (Arms A and B) to control (Arm C). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for Arm C versus each of Arms A and B. ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

S1613 Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab or Cetuximab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic HER2/Neu Amplified Colorectal Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) (Arm 1) in HER-2 amplified metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) on TP compared to control arm (Arm 2) of cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride (irinotecan) (CETIRI). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the overall response rate ...

Phase

1.17 miles

Learn More »

Testing MK-3475 (Pembrolizumab) After Surgery for Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Locally Advanced Urothelial Cancer

DUAL PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in all patients with muscle-invasive bladder and upper-tract urothelial carcinoma treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus (vs.) observation. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine DFS and OS in PD-L1 positive and negative patients with muscle-invasive bladder and ...

Phase

1.17 miles

Learn More »

Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent Stage IV Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the objective response rate (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 among patients treated with durvalumab (MEDI4736) plus tremelimumab. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the duration of response (DoR) among patients who achieve a complete response (CR) ...

Phase

1.17 miles

Learn More »

Cancer Care Delivery in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the proportion of adolescent and young adult (AYA) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients with a documented treatment plan consistent with NCCN guidelines for AYAs with ALL. II. To evaluate the proportion of AYA ALL patients whose delivered treatment during induction and post-induction therapy (PIT) is ...

Phase N/A

1.17 miles

Learn More »

Platinum Based Chemotherapy or Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Basal-Like Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with residual basal-like disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy who are randomized to post-preoperative platinum based chemotherapy with those who are randomized to capecitabine. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate overall survival (OS) and response-free survival (RFS) ...

Phase

1.17 miles

Learn More »

Cisplatin Carboplatin and Etoposide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract or Pancreas That Is Metastatic or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the progression free survival (PFS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the PFS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the response rate (RR) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide ...

Phase

1.17 miles

Learn More »