Search Medical Condition
Please enter condition
Please choose location from dropdown

Willoughby Hills, Ohio Clinical Trials

A listing of Willoughby Hills, Ohio clinical trials actively recruiting patient volunteers.

RESULTS

Found (145) clinical trials

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease Who Failed Prior Biologic Treatment

The objective of Study M15-991 is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab versus placebo during induction therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active CD.

Phase

6.21 miles

Learn More »

A Study of Tofacitinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Stable Remission

This study is a follow up study for subjects with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in stable remission designed to evaluate flexible dosing of CP-690,550.

Phase

6.21 miles

Learn More »

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Subjects With Ulcerative Colitis Who Responded to Induction Treatment in M16-067 or M16-065

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of risankizumab in subjects with ulcerative colitis (UC) in subjects who responded to induction treatment with risankizumab in a prior AbbVie study of risankizumab in UC. This study consists of three sub-studies: Substudy 1 is a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, ...

Phase

6.21 miles

Learn More »

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Subjects With Crohn's Disease Who Responded to Induction Treatment in M16-006 or M15-991; or Completed M15-989

The study consists of 3 sub-studies, as follows: Sub-study 1 (Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab versus placebo as maintenance therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) who responded to risankizumab induction treatment in Study M16-006 or Study M15-991. ...

Phase

6.21 miles

Learn More »

Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab Versus Ustekinumab for One Year

This study compares the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab versus adalimumab. It will consist of screening (within 1- 5 weeks prior to Week 0), treatment phase (Weeks 0 to 52), and follow-up phase (up to Week 76). The primary hypothesis is that ustekinumab is superior to adalimumab as measured by ...

Phase

6.21 miles

Learn More »

A Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Induction Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Failed Prior Biologic Therapy

The objectives of Sub-Study 1 are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of risankizumab as induction treatment in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), and to identify the appropriate induction dose of risankizumab for further evaluation in Sub-Study 2. The objective of Sub-Study 2 is to ...

Phase

6.21 miles

Learn More »

Efficacy Safety and Tolerability Study of Oral Ubrogepant in the Acute Treatment of Migraine

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 2 doses of ubrogepant (50 and 100 mg) compared to placebo for the acute treatment of a single migraine attack.

Phase

7.23 miles

Learn More »

Efficacy and Safety Study of Mepolizumab in Subjects With Severe Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES)

Mepolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody. In conditions where eosinophilia is considered to play an important part in the pathology, including eosinophilic asthma, HES, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, a consistent reduction in blood eosinophil counts is observed in association with mepolizumab administration, with concomitant clinical improvement. This is a ...

Phase

7.23 miles

Learn More »

Efficacy and Safety of FG-4592 for Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Lower Risk MDS With Low Red Blood Cell Transfusion Burden

This study includes an Open-Label and a Double-Blind component. In each, there is an up to 28 days screen period followed by a treatment period of 52 weeks and a 4 week end of treatment assessment.

Phase

7.23 miles

Learn More »

A Study of Cobimetinib Plus Atezolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab in Participants With Previously Untreated Advanced BRAFv600 Wild-Type Melanoma

This is a Phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab in treatment-naive participants with advanced BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma.

Phase

7.23 miles

Learn More »