Search Medical Condition
Please enter condition
Please choose location from dropdown
Clear Trial Filters
 

Elyria, Ohio Clinical Trials

A listing of Elyria, Ohio clinical trials actively recruiting patient volunteers.

RESULTS

Found (13) clinical trials

Cetuximab Cisplatin Fluorouracil and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Stage II or Stage III Anal Cancer

OBJECTIVES: Primary - Determine whether the addition of cetuximab to combined modality therapy (CMT) comprising cisplatin, fluorouracil, and radiotherapy reduces the local failure rate by ≥ 50% at 3 years (compared with historical data) in immunocompetent patients with stage I-IIIB invasive anal carcinoma. Secondary - Determine objective response rate (complete ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Nivolumab After Combined Modality Therapy in Treating Patients With High Risk Stage II-IIIB Anal Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate whether therapy with nivolumab following combined modality therapy (CMT) improves disease-free survival (DFS) compared with observation in patients with high risk anal carcinoma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare nivolumab following combined modality therapy (CMT) with observation in patients with high risk anal carcinoma with regard ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Nivolumab Cabozantinib S-Malate and Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To demonstrate whether combination therapy of nivolumab and cabozantinib s-malate (cabozantinib), or of nivolumab and cabozantinib, and ipilimumab as compared to nivolumab alone, extends progression-free survival (PFS) for this patient population with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the overall survival for ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Cisplatin/Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) treated with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (CE) or CE with nivolumab (CEN) as front-line treatment. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate overall survival of patients with ED-SCLC treated with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (CE) ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Lung-MAP: Talazoparib in Treating Patients With HRRD Positive Recurrent Stage IV Squamous Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial) with talazoparib (BMN 673) in HRRD Medivation (MDVN)-positive patients. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate investigator assessed progression-free survival (IA-PFS) and overall survival (OS) associated with therapy in HRRD MDVN-positive patients. II. To evaluate ORR, ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Dose-Escalated Photon IMRT or Proton Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves overall survival, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To indirectly compare dose-escalated and ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Cisplatin Carboplatin and Etoposide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract or Pancreas That Is Metastatic or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the progression free survival (PFS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the PFS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the response rate (RR) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

S1505: Combination Chemotherapy or Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Paclitaxel Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess 2-year overall survival in each treatment arm (fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin [modified (m)FOLFIRINOX] and gemcitabine [gemcitabine hydrochloride]/nab-paclitaxel [paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation]) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. II. If the stated threshold is met in one or both arms: to choose the better regimen ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors Lymphomas or Multiple Myeloma (The MATCH Screening Trial)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the proportion of patients with objective response (OR) to targeted study agent(s) in patients with advanced refractory cancers/lymphomas/multiple myeloma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the proportion of patients alive and progression free at 6 months of treatment with targeted study agent in patients with advanced ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic Sarcoma That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the confirmed response rate of single agent nivolumab and dual agent nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate adverse event rates (National Cancer Institute [NCI] Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v]4.0) ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »