Akron,, Ohio
A Phase III Renal Outcomes and Cardiovascular Mortality Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Combination With Dapagliflozin in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease and High Blood Pressure
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of baxdrostat in combination with dapagliflozin, compared with placebo and dapagliflozin, in reducing the risk of the composite of > 50% decline in eGFR, kidney failure, or CV death, in individuals with CKD and HTN. This study consists of a 4-week dapagliflozin Run-in Period for participants untreated with SGLT2i at screening, and a double-blinded period where participants will receive either baxdrostat/dapagliflozin or placebo/dapagliflozin. Site visits will take place at 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 34, and 52-weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months. The study closure procedures will be initiated when the predetermined number of primary endpoint events is predicted to have occurred ie, the PACD. All randomised participants including any participants who have prematurely discontinued study intervention will be scheduled for a SCV within a few weeks of the PACD. This period can be extended by the Sponsor. In case of premature discontinuation of blinded study intervention, participants will continue in the study and receive dapagliflozin 10 mg, unless the participant meets dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria. If study intervention is temporarily or permanently discontinued, the participant should remain in the study, and it is important that the scheduled study visits (including the PTDV for participants with permanent discontinuation of study intervention) and data collection continue according to the study protocol until the SCV.
Phase
3Span
268 weeksSponsor
AstraZenecaKagoshima
Recruiting
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Lepodisiran on the Reduction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Elevated Lipoprotein(a) - ACCLAIM-Lp(a)
Phase
3Span
265 weeksSponsor
Eli Lilly and CompanyKagoshima
Recruiting
A Study to Test Whether BI 764524 Helps People With an Eye Condition Called Diabetic Retinopathy
Phase
2Span
130 weeksSponsor
Boehringer IngelheimKagoshima
Recruiting
Kagoshima
Recruiting
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Drug Levels of BMS-986369 (Golcadomide) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory T-cell Lymphomas in Japan (GOLSEEK-3)
Phase
1/2Span
360 weeksSponsor
Bristol-Myers SquibbKagoshima
Recruiting
A Study to Assess the Effect of Dexpramipexole in Adolescents and Adults With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexpramipexole in adults and adolescents with severe, inadequately controlled asthma with eosinophilic phenotype on medium to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS )and at least one additional asthma controller medication with or without oral corticosteroids (OCS). Approximately 1400 participants will be randomized globally. Participants will receive dexpramipexole, or placebo, administered orally, over a 52-week treatment period. The study also includes a post-treatment follow-up period of 4 weeks.
Phase
3Span
183 weeksSponsor
Areteia TherapeuticsKagoshima
Recruiting
A Study to Evaluate INCA033989 Administered as a Monotherapy or in Combination With Ruxolitinib in Participants With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Phase
1Span
232 weeksSponsor
Incyte CorporationKagoshima
Recruiting
Japan Post-Marketing Surveillance for Peficitinib to Assess Safety and Effectiveness in the Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
This is a mandatory Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS) requested by Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) as a part of the Japan-Risk Management Plan (J-RMP).
Phase
N/ASpan
331 weeksSponsor
Astellas Pharma IncKagoshima
Recruiting
Immediate Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Approach for Walled-off Necrosis
Pancreatic fluid collection is a late complication of severe acute pancreatitis. According to the revised Atlanta classification, walled-off necrosis (WON) is defined as an encapsulated collection of necrotic tissue that is observed after four weeks of the onset of acute pancreatitis. Infected WON is associated with high morbidity and mortality; therefore, an appropriate treatment, including antibiotics and drainage, is mandatory. With the development of endoscopic equipment, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage has become a first-line treatment modality for infected WON. For patients who are refractory to EUS-guided drainage, endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) is a treatment option to facilitate direct removal of infected necrotic tissue within the WON. However, due to potentially lethal adverse events of EN, such as bleeding, perforation, and peritonitis, EN is usually withheld for several days after EUS-guided drainage. This strategy is known as "the step-up approach." Recently, with the accumulated evidence supporting the safety of EN, especially with the use of a dedicated lumen-apposing metal stent, it has been reported that EN immediately after EUS-guided drainage can shorten the treatment duration without increasing adverse events. Given these lines of evidence, the investigators hypothesized that immediate EN following EUS-guided drainage of WON might shorten time to clinical success compared to the step-up approach. To examine this hypothesis, the investigators planned to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing treatment duration between EN immediately after EUS-guided drainage versus the step-up approach in patients with symptomatic WON.
Phase
N/ASpan
454 weeksSponsor
Tokyo UniversityKagoshima
Recruiting
Interfant-21 Treatment Protocol for Infants Under 1 Year with KMT2A-rearranged ALL or Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia
All infants that are eligible for this study and for whom the parents/legal representatives give informed consent will be enrolled in this study. All patients will receive one cycle of blinatumomab on top of the standard treatment backbone after induction therapy. Medium risk patients, that respond well to the 1st cycle will be treated with a 2nd cycle of blinatumomab replacing one chemo course after consolidation therapy. If they do not respond well enough they will be treated according to the current treatment standard. Minimal residual disease will be used to determine the response to blinatumomab. High risk patients will be eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation after the first blinatumomab cycle if they are Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative (defined as < 0.01%). Also medium risk patients with insufficient MRD response after induction or after the 1st cycle of blinatumomab will be allocated to high risk treatment and will be eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Phase
3Span
407 weeksSponsor
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric OncologyKagoshima
Recruiting