Search Medical Condition
Please enter condition
Please choose location from dropdown

Raritan, New Jersey Clinical Trials

A listing of Raritan, New Jersey clinical trials actively recruiting patient volunteers.

RESULTS

Found (71) clinical trials

Registry Study for Radiation Therapy Outcomes

The purpose of this research study is to collect and analyze information from patients being treated with various forms of radiation therapy.

Phase N/A

9.34 miles

Learn More »

PPCR: Registry for Pedi Patients Treated With Proton RT

Once you are enrolled in the study, you will receive treatment, evaluations and follow up care for your type of cancer as determined by your treating physician according to clinical judgment and standard of care for your clinic. All treatments that you receive will be recorded, including all surgeries and ...

Phase N/A

9.34 miles

Learn More »

Proton Therapy vs. IMRT for Low or Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

Because no one knows which of the study options is best, you will be "randomized" into one of the study groups: IMRT or PBT. Randomization means that you are put into a group by chance, like flipping a coin. Neither you nor the research doctor will choose which group you ...

Phase N/A

9.34 miles

Learn More »

Intravenous Milk Thistle (Silibinin-Legalon) for Hepatic Failure Induced by Amatoxin/Amanita Mushroom Poisoning

Patients with suspected amatoxin poisoning are reviewed for enrollment in the study by contacting the Legalon SIL study hotline (866) 520-4412.

Phase

9.34 miles

Learn More »

Dose-Escalated Photon IMRT or Proton Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves overall survival, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To indirectly compare dose-escalated and ...

Phase

9.34 miles

Learn More »

Comparing Photon Therapy To Proton Therapy To Treat Patients With Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after image guided, motion-managed photon radiotherapy (Arm 1) or after image guided, motion-managed proton radiotherapy (Arm 2) both given with concurrent platinum- based chemotherapy. II. To compare the cardiac toxicity and ...

Phase

9.34 miles

Learn More »

Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Proton vs. Photon Therapy for Patients With Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RADCOMP) Consortium Trial

Because no one knows which radiation treatment is best, if you decide to take part in this study, you will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups, and then you will begin radiation treatment according to usual medical practice. Randomly assigning you to a group helps makes sure ...

Phase N/A

9.34 miles

Learn More »

A Prospective Comparative Study of Outcomes With Proton and Photon Radiation in Prostate Cancer

This study is a large, prospective, pragmatic, controlled comparison of patient-centric outcomes [quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and disease control] between parallel cohorts of men with prostate cancer treated simultaneously at proton therapy facilities and at geographically similar conventional (photon-based) radiation facilities using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. Pre-specified subset ...

Phase N/A

9.34 miles

Learn More »

Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR)

PSOLAR is an 8 year registry study. A registry is an observational study that evaluates the status of a disease. This registry study will only include patients who volunteer to take part. About 4000 infliximab-exposed patients, 4000 ustekinumab-exposed patients and as well as a comparable number of patients (4000) on ...

Phase N/A

9.34 miles

Learn More »

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Participants With Giant Cell Arteritis

This study consists of two periods. The objective of Period 1 is to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with a 26-week corticosteroid (CS) taper regimen compared to placebo in combination with a 52-week CS taper regimen, as measured by the proportion of participants in sustained remission at Week ...

Phase

9.34 miles

Learn More »