Search Medical Condition
Please enter condition
Please choose location from dropdown
 

Cherry Hill, New Jersey Clinical Trials

A listing of Cherry Hill, New Jersey clinical trials actively recruiting patient volunteers.

RESULTS

Found (2058) clinical trials

A Study of Rovalpituzumab Tesirine as Maintenance Therapy Following First- Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Participants With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (MERU)

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, and multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy of rovalpituzumab tesirine as maintenance therapy following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Phase

5.12 miles

Learn More »

A Study of Atezolizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Paclitaxel Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Participants With Newly-Diagnosed Stage III or Stage IV Ovarian Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

This is a Phase III, global, double-blind, 2-arm randomized study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab versus placebo + paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab. Study participants will have Stage 3 or 4 ovarian cancer (OC), fallopian tube cancer (FTC), or primary ...

Phase

5.12 miles

Learn More »

Continued Access Protocol for the Evaluation of the OPTIMIZER Smart System

The Continued Access study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study designed to allow controlled access to the Optimizer Smart System until the PMA order has been issued by the FDA.

Phase N/A

5.12 miles

Learn More »

Safety Of Rivipansel (GMI-1070) In The Treatment Of One or More Vaso-occlusive Crises In Hospitalized Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease

This is an open label extension study in subjects who are 6 years of age or older with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) who have completed the double blind Phase 3 study (B5201002). This study is designed to evaluate the safety and describe the efficacy of rivipansel as treatment for one ...

Phase

5.12 miles

Learn More »

Olaparib or Cediranib Maleate and Olaparib Compared With Standard Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the efficacy of either single agent olaparib or the combination of cediranib (cediranib maleate) and olaparib, as measured by progression free survival (PFS), as compared to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in the setting of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess ...

Phase

5.12 miles

Learn More »

Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of AB103 in the Treatment of Patients With Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

The primary hypothesis of this study is that in addition to standard of care treatment (which includes surgical intervention, antimicrobial therapy and critical care support for organ dysfunction or failure), AB103 will demonstrate a clinically significant treatment benefit over placebo. This hypothesis will be addressed by measuring the effect of ...

Phase

5.12 miles

Learn More »

Margetuximab Plus Chemotherapy vs Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer

An evaluation of efficacy, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent review and overall survival (OS), of margetuximab plus chemotherapy compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer who have received at least 2 prior lines of anti-HER2 directed therapy in the metastatic setting, ...

Phase

5.12 miles

Learn More »

A Study of ABT-414 in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (GBM) With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Amplification ( Intellance1 )

The main study for all countries except China is closed. The sub-study of ABT-414 (number of participants being sought=12) in participants with newly diagnosed EGFR-amplified GBM who have mild or moderate hepatic impairment is open to enrollment.

Phase

5.12 miles

Learn More »

Evaluation of the GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) in the Treatment of Lesions of the Aortic Arch and Descending Thoracic Aorta (Zone 0/1)

The objective of this study is to determine whether the GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis is safe and effective in treating lesions of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta.

Phase N/A

5.12 miles

Learn More »

Evaluation of the GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) in the Treatment of Lesions of the Aortic Arch and Descending Thoracic Aorta (Zone 2)

The objective of this study is to determine whether the GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis is safe and effective in treating lesions of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta.

Phase N/A

5.12 miles

Learn More »