Fair Haven, Michigan

Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Temperature control is a key neurointensive care for post-cardiac arrest patients. Although therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be effective in the past, recent large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate its efficacy. The international guidelines recommend temperature control under 37.7°C. However, the optimal temperature control, i.e., hypothermia versus normothermia, remains controversial. Additionally, randomized controlled trials that examined temperature control after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are lacking. ECPR is a resuscitation technique using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest. In ECPR patients, ECMO using a heat exchanger can more rapidly achieve the targeted temperature as compared to other temperature control devices. Early cooling to achieve hypothermia after resuscitation is expected to be more effective for neuroprotection in the injured brain. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that hypothermia would be effective in ECPR patients. Furthermore, ECMO can stabilize the respiratory and circulatory status. Therefore, hypothermia, which may have side effects such as electrolyte abnormalities and arrhythmias, may be safely performed by ECMO. However, ECMO requires the administration of anticoagulants; therefore, it has the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Among patients receiving ECPR, bleeding is a common complication due to its relatively difficult procedure, considering the fact that emergent cannulation is performed under resuscitation. Additionally, CPR-related complications can also result in bleeding. These complications may be enhanced by hypothermia. Therefore, hypothermia after ECPR could contribute to a favorable outcome, but it could also cause bleeding. The SAVE-J NEUROTHERM trial is a cluster randomized trial that evaluated and compared the mortality risk, neurological outcomes, and adverse events between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who underwent hypothermia and normothermia after ECPR.

A Study of GSK5733584 in Combination With Anti-cancer Therapies for Advanced Solid Tumors

A Phase 3 Study of TS-172 in Hyperphosphatemia Patients on Hemodialysis

A Study to Evaluate the Safety of Fycompa Injection in Participants With Partial-Onset Seizures or Primary Generalized Tonic- Clonic Seizures

A Study of Belantamab Mafodotin Administered in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (BRd) Versus Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Who Are Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (TI-NDMM)

Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib in Unresectable Cutaneous Angiosarcoma Patients

This is a multi-center, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib therapy in patients with unresectable cutaneous angiosarcoma (WHO Classification of Skin Tumors 4th edition). In Japan, the first-line treatment for cutaneous angiosarcoma is surgical resection with radiotherapy for patients with limited and completely resectable lesions and chemotherapy alone or with radiotherapy for patients with unresectable lesions. Paclitaxel is widely used for chemotherapy based on the ANGIOTAX trial. However, the prognosis of Japanese patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma is still poor, with a mean survival time of 19.52 months and a 5-year survival of 9%. The development of a new therapeutic regimen is an urgent task to improve the prognosis of such patients; however, company-sponsored clinical trials for this disease are not actively conducted since cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare cancer. For the above reasons, conducting this study as an investigator-initiated clinical trial is important. The clinical hypothesis of this study is "the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination therapy exceeds ANGIOTAX trial in the primary endpoint of response rate, and the efficacy and safety present expecting results in the secondary endpoints." According to an epidemiological survey of skin cancer based on the National Cancer Registry, the total number of cutaneous angiosarcoma registered in 2016 and 2017 was 993, with an average annual registration of 497 cases. Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a very rare cancer, and it is impossible to secure enough participants to conduct a randomized controlled clinical trial. Therefore, this study is designed as a single-arm study. The result of a phase II study (Alliance A091902) of cabozantinib + nivolumab for advanced angiosarcoma previously treated with a taxane-based regimen was reported at ASCO 2023, and the overall response rate for cutaneous angiosarcoma (N=13) was 54% among the 22 cases registered to the trial. It is expected that a high response rate will also be obtained in this study regarding a similar regimen. Since this is a single-arm study for rare cancer, eligible patients who give consent are expected to be enrolled almost comprehensively, so selection bias is unlikely to occur. The primary endpoint of this study is the response rate, a common endpoint in phase II trials. Since the response rate in the ANGIOTAX trial was 18%, the threshold response rate for this trial will be set at 18%, the expected response rate at 35%, the significance level at 0.05, and the statistical power at 0.70. According to this study's threshold response rate, expected response rate, significance level, and statistical power, the number of participants required for analysis will be 35. The planned number of participants to be enrolled was set at 38, anticipating some dropouts. In the ANGIOTAX trial, 11 participants among the 30 enrolled were previously treated with chemotherapy, and 19 were untreated. To ensure comparability with the trial, the maximum number of previously treated and untreated participants to be enrolled in this study is set at 13 and 25, respectively. The ANGIOTAX study reported that the progression-free survival at the second cycle (10 of 13 previously treated, 13 of 14 untreated) and median survival time (p=0.37 by log-rank test) were similar between previously treated and untreated patients. If at least three cases of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) are not confirmed at the 12-week efficacy evaluation in the first 20 participants out of the planned 38, the protocol treatment will be considered not effective enough, and early termination of the study will be discussed. Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib are unapproved drugs for cutaneous angiosarcoma in Japan and cannot be used in the medical insurance scheme. Participants enrolled in this study will have the opportunity to receive treatment with the off-label drugs of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. Since the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib combination therapy for cutaneous angiosarcoma is unclear, it is unknown whether clinical benefits such as tumor shrinkage and prognosis extension will be obtained. However, although the cancer type is different, it has been reported that the combination of lenvatinib and an anti-PD-1 antibody showed enhanced tumor growth inhibition in renal cell carcinoma cell lines compared to the single administration of lenvatinib or an anti-PD-1 antibody. In addition, it has been suggested that lenvatinib increases the proportion of activated cytotoxic T cells in lymph nodes and reduces the proportion of TAM, an immunosuppressive cell, in tumor tissue. Since lenvatinib with an anti-PD-1 antibody may enhance the anti-tumor immune response, it is anticipated that the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib may further enhance the therapeutic effect in cutaneous angiosarcoma. Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib may cause acute or late toxicities, including immune-related adverse events, which are expected disadvantages of participating in this study. Inclusion/exclusion criteria and treatment modification criteria were carefully considered to minimize the impact of such toxicities. The pembrolizumab and lenvatinib combination regimen was determined based on the phase 1b part of the phase 1b/2 trial 111/KEYNOTE-146. 111/KEYNOTE-146 was primarily aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and phase II recommended dose (RP2D) of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W (treatment dose for all approved indications at the beginning of 111/KEYNOTE-146 trial). The initial dose of lenvatinib was 24 mg QD (the starting dose currently approved as monotherapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma) and was administered orally. The Phase 1b part of the trial enrolled 13 participants (pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W plus lenvatinib 24 mg QD: n = 3; pembrolizumab 200 mg plus lenvatinib 20 mg QD: n = 10). Among the subjects, 8 had renal cell carcinoma, two non-small cell lung cancer, two endometrial cancer, and one melanoma. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred with pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus lenvatinib 24 mg QD (one participant experienced Grade 3 joint pain and the other Grade 3 exhaustion). No DLT was observed with pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus lenvatinib 20 mg QD. Accordingly, the RP2D of combination therapy was determined as pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus lenvatinib 20 mg QD. The RP2D was evaluated for efficacy and safety in the phase II study. Based on the encouraging antitumor effect and a tolerable safety profile found in multiple tumor types in the 111/KEYNOTE-146 trial, two Phase III trials, 309/KEYNOTE-775, and 307/KEYNOTE-581 have been initiated, and drug combinations have been approved in multiple regions for the treatment of these tumor types. One course of this study is set at 21 days. The length of each course will not be extended or shortened. After confirmation that the participant does not fall under any of the criteria for termination or suspension, 200 mg of pembrolizumab is administered intravenously on day 1 of each course in outpatient settings. The intravenous injection lasts 30 minutes, with an allowance of -5 to +10 minutes. If pembrolizumab cannot be administered (e.g., because the participant meets suspension criteria), its administration will be reconsidered on day 1 of the next course. Participants take 20 mg of lenvatinib capsule orally, once daily (from day 1 to 21 of every course). On the days when the participant receives both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib, either drug can be administered first. Lenvatinib should be taken at the same time every day as possible, regardless of whether it's taken with or without food or examination, before/after/between meals. This study's dose of pembrolizumab is only one level, 200 mg. Lenvatinib is started at 20 mg QD, which will be gradually tapered to 14 mg, 10 mg, and 8 mg if the participant falls under any of the dose reduction criteria. The minimum dose of lenvatinib is 8 mg QD, and a lower dose should not be accepted. Completion of protocol treatment is defined as completing 35 courses of pembrolizumab and/or lenvatinib. Tumor assessment is performed during the screening period, every 6 weeks from the initiation of protocol study to 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks afterward, by CT, MRI, or visual inspection (colored photograph). The modality and imaging conditions used at screening should be used for the consecutive assessments. Imaging tests or visual inspections should be continued until the overall response turns to PD or the post-study treatment starts. If the overall response of CR or PR was first detected, the next imaging test or visual inspection for confirmation should be performed 4 weeks after that day or later. An interim analysis will be conducted during the registration period to evaluate whether the response rate is inferior to that expected and determine if enrollment should be ceased (and the study be terminated due to ineffectiveness). The interim analysis will be conducted in accordance with a SWOG two-stage design. In the 1st stage, the enrollment is suspended when the 20th patient is enrolled, and the data, such as response evaluation used for the interim analysis, will be locked for around 12 weeks after the enrollment of the 20th patient. Even if the 20th patient is not evaluated 12 weeks after the start of treatment, the timing of the data lock will not be changed. The best overall response by central review will be used to calculate the response rate in the interim analysis. The FAS at the time of the interim analysis is the population analyzed. After fixation of the data on the best overall response by central review 6 months after the end of the registration period, an analysis mainly on the primary endpoint will be performed (the main analysis). The population analyzed will be FAS. The main analysis aims to determine whether the pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib therapy is sufficiently effective using the primary endpoint of overall response rate by central review. If the null hypothesis "the true response rate is below the threshold response rate (18%)" is not rejected, the primary endpoint is not significantly different from てthe ANGIOTAX trial, and the protocol treatment will not be considered superior. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the primary endpoint significantly differs from the ANGIOTAX trial, and the protocol treatment is considered superior after further consideration of the secondary endpoints. In this case, the application for approval of the combination therapy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib to expand indications for treating unresectable cutaneous angiosarcoma will be considered.

A Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Effectiveness of GSK4418959 Alone or in Combination With Other Anti-cancer Agents in Participants With Solid Tumors

AI-driven Narrow-band Imaging Score for Disease Assessment and Outcome Prediction in Ulcerative Colitis

This is a multicentre prospective international study. This study aims at developing a new simple endoscopic score using white light endoscopy - high definition (WLE-HD), Texture and colour enhancement imaging (TXI), red dichromatic imaging (RDI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) modes, focusing on vascular features to distinguish between quiescent versus patchy mild Ulcerative Colitis. It will evaluate the new score's diagnostic performance in defining disease activity/remission compared to existing endoscopic and histological scores and predict long-term clinical outcomes. Finally, it also aims to develop and adapt existing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms according to WLE-HD, TXI, RDI and NBI to grade and standardize endoscopic and histological disease assessment and predict long-term clinical outcomes. The study will be divided in several phases: - In the first phase, the score will be developed on the first 30 consecutive virtual electronic chromoendoscopy (VCE) videos (using TXI-RDI and NBI) of UC patients, with different grade of disease activity. Experts in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) endoscopy will review images and videos from recruited patients to define the endoscopic mucosal and vascular features of the new score. These will be used for a stepwise discussion. A round table discussion using modified Delphi method will be conducted by experts worldwide to ensure equal participation and identify the best component descriptors of endoscopic vascular healing. The components that will achieve 100% consensus will be selected, and the most important endoscopy predictive variables will be confirmed by using a machine learning technique. Finally, a new endoscopic score will be generated. This should be reproducible, valid and responsive. - In the second phase, the new endoscopic scoring system will be validated in a large cohort of UC patients, focusing on patients with quiescent disease versus patchy mild colitis. Diagnostic accuracy, interobserver agreement and ability to predict clinical outcome according to the new endoscopic score focused on vascular features assessed with VCE will be evaluated - In the third phase, the reproducibility of the new endoscopic scoring system will be evaluated among gastroenterologists with different levels of experience through a short survey and a computerised training module. - In the fourth phase, new and existing AI algorithms will be developed and adapted to these endoscopic videos and histological images to grade and standardize endoscopic and histological disease assessment and predict long-term clinical outcome in UC.

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Activity of GSK5733584 for Injection in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors

A Survey of Susoctocog Alfa (Genetical Recombination) in Participants With Acquired Haemophilia A