Blue Ridge, Georgia

Impact of Pain From Injectables Antiretroviral Treatments in HIV-1 Patients Based on the Injection Site (Ventrogluteal or Dorsogluteal) and the Use or Non-use of Virtual Reality Headset

Five visits will be performed as a standard of care: Inclusion visit: After checking of the eligibility, patient is informed of the study and an informed note is given. Injection site is examined. If the patient agrees, consent is collected. Visit D0 (all the patients): examination of the injection zone by the nurse, collection of concomitant treatments (only analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs) taken by the patient, CAB+RPV injections according to the randomization arm, completion of the numerical scale by the patient following ARV injections, submission of the patient log for the assessment of pain by the patient during the 7 days following the ARV injections. Follow-up visits (M1, M3, M5 for naïve patients and M2, M4, M6 for treatment-experienced patients): recovery of the patient log with assessment of pain on previous injection, collection of concomitants treatments and adverse events, examination of the injection site by the nurse, injection according the randomization arm, completion of the numerical scale by the patient following the injections, delivery of a new patient note. End of study visit: recovery of the patient log with assessment of pain on previous injection, collection of concomitants treatments and adverse events, questioning the study procedures, patient's preferred choice between the different injection procedures. For the research needs, - The injection site (ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal) will be chosen, by randomisation - Wearing a virtual reality headset A patient log to assess pain, using a numerical scale (1 to 10), will be filled out by the patient

Prevention of Postpartum Venous Thromboembolism in Women at Intermediate Risk

Evaluation of the Inflammation-based Index as a Predictive Marker of Clinical and Radiological Response in Patients Treated With Lu-177 Oxodotreotide for Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour

A Study to Learn About How Safe BAY 3389934 is, Its Suitable Dose, and How it Affects the Participants With Sepsis Induced Coagulopathy

Assessment of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation (ATRIAL-MR)

A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Newborn Screening Using in Silico Panel-based Solo Genome Sequencing in France

Long-Term Evaluation of TAILORED Vs Anatomical Ablation Strategy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

The TAILORED-AF study demonstrated at one year's follow-up that a tailored ablation strategy guided by Volta Medical AI-software targeting areas of spatio-temporal dispersed electrograms in combination with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation is more effective to an anatomical ablation strategy targeting PVI alone (current standard of care) for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). VX1 legacy device renamed Volta AF-Xplorer was used in the TAILORED-AF study in the treatment arm. No additional treatments are specifically required in the scope of this ancillary TAILORED-LT study which aims to follow the patients previously treated in the initial TAILORED-AF study over the long-term. However, in the event of repeat procedures during the TAILORED-LT study, the choice of the ablation technique will be left to the investigator's discretion, regardless of the patient's randomization arm in the TAILORED-AF study. The annual follow-up will be performed as in routine clinical practice post AF ablation procedures: visits at 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months post TAILORED-AF Study index procedure. It is possible that some of these annual visits cannot be completed prospectively due to time already having elapsed between the end of the subject participation in the TAILORED-AF study and the date of enrollment in the extension TAILORED-LT study. In this case, available data (among those expected by the study protocol) will be collected retrospectively. The additional procedures related to this clinical investigation are limited to annual 24-hour Holters and to the administration of Quality Of Life questionnaires (SF-36 and AFEQT) to the patients during follow-up visits.

Role of High-Throughput Whole Genome Sequencing for the Diagnosis and Care of Atypical Diabetes

The prevalence of diabetes is 7.4% in France among people aged 20 to 79 years in 2015. We must also consider "pre-diabetes" (subjects with glucose intolerance), whose prevalence is equivalent to that of diabetes (2012 estimate). The incidence of diabetes is exploding both for type 2 diabetes, which represents 85% of diabetes, and for type 1 diabetes, which represents 10% of cases and starts one out of two times before the age of 20. Diabetes typing is essential to guide therapeutic choices, particularly the use of insulin. This typing is based on the pathophysiology of the disease, distinguishing insulinopenia from autoimmune causes in type 1 diabetes, monogenic diabetes, secondary or atypical diabetes and type 2 diabetes, where insulinopenia and insulin resistance coexist. Thus, while a formal biological diagnosis is possible for some forms of atypical diabetes and for type 1 diabetes, no biological parameter is currently available for type 2 diabetes, which remains a diagnosis of exclusion. As a result, diabetes represents a source of diagnostic and therapeutic erraticism, amplified by the clinical heterogeneity of type 2 diabetes, which is obvious and underestimated, and by a clinical phenotyping of patients that is often defective. The economic consequences are important because the health costs are very different depending on whether or not patients are treated with insulin. Type 1 and type 2 diabetes are examples of chronic, non-transmissible, multigenic, multifactorial diseases. However, less than 10% of the heritability of type 2 diabetes is currently explained by the associated genetic variants. And although genetic tests exist to diagnose certain monogenic diabetes, this diagnosis is made in less than 20% of cases, mainly in the presence of an atypical clinical presentation of diabetes. Moreover, there is no reason to rule out the hypothesis of paucigenic forms, at the interface of monogenic diabetes and multigenic forms as usually envisaged, as has been observed in chronic pancreatitis, which is also accompanied by diabetes. The study will be conducted according to a randomized trial design comparing two diagnostic strategies defined as follows: - Control strategy: in silico analysis of a panel of validated genes (ISApanel - Diabetome 1). Patients recruited along the control procedure will stay in their group using current genetic diagnosis practices and standard of care that may differ from one center to another. - Intervention strategy: whole genome sequencing coupled with multidisciplinary conciliation meeting. We plan to randomize one patient in the control group for two in the intervention group. The main objective of the study is to assess the contribution of whole genome sequencing (WGS) coupled with a multidisciplinary conciliation meeting (MCM) on diagnosis of atypical forms of diabetes compared to an in-silico analysis of a panel of validated genes (ISApanel), corresponding to current practice. The target population is 1020 adults with atypical diabetes for whom it is possible to obtain a blood sample.

A Phase II Study Evaluating Glofitamab in Combination With Venetoclax Plus Zanubrutinib or Venetoclax Alone in Subjects With Untreated or Relapsed/Refractory High-risk Mantle-cell Lymphoma

Cohort A : 40 subjects will be included and treated Cohort B : 36 subjects will be included and treated Cohort C : 24 subjects will be included and treated Subjects in cohorts A and C will receive during induction phase 12 cycles of Zanubrutinib/Venetoclax/Glofitamab and during maintenance phase 23 cycles of Zanubrutinib/Venetoclax Subjects in cohort B will receive during induction phase 12 cycles of Venetoclax/Glofitamab and during maintenance phase 23 cycles of Venetoclax

Study of Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Allograft (allo-HSC) At High Risk of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)

There are several treatments based on azole molecules: voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole... To date, none of these treatments has been approved for primary post-allograft prophylaxis. Posaconazole is indicated in cases of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy after allo-CSH), and as primary prophylaxis during aplasia in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia/myelodysplasia (AML/MDS). Other azole molecules are not approved for primary prophylaxis, and may give rise to drug interactions with certain treatments prescribed for allograft patients (e.g. ciclosporin, letermovir). Although recommendations for the administration of posaconazole as primary prophylaxis post allo-CSH have been in place for 4 years, few studies are available to date. The adult hematology department of Nantes University Hospital conducted a retrospective study of 70 allograft patients at high risk of IFI between 04/2020 and 12/2021. Posaconazole treatment was administered from D0 (or the day after the 2nd dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide) to D100. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with discontinuation due to possible treatment toxicity in 12.6% of cases, mainly of hepatic origin (n=7). Posaconazole was resumed in 2 cases without recurrence of toxicity. In 84.2% of patients, no IFI was observed. One of the limitations of this study was the low number of determinations of residual posaconazole concentration ([C]min). In fact, [C]min was carried out in only 59 patients/70, with a median delay of 9 days. In 43% of cases, the [C]min was insufficient (< 0.5 mg/L), which is significantly lower than the [C]min obtained in patients with AML/MDS undergoing induction ([C]min< 0.5 mg/L: 5% of patients). It therefore seems essential to carry out a prospective study with close [C]min measurement in the specific situation of allograft patients, a population that appears to be at risk of underdosing in the light of the initial retrospective results of analyses.