Iver, United Kingdom
Personalized Medicine for Advanced Biliary Cancer Patients
This is a Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial to evaluate whether the introduction of molecular targeted therapy (MTT) as maintenance after 4 cycles of standard-of-care first-line systemic therapy (1L SoC) is superior to continuation of 1L-SoC in the treatment of patients with ABC. The trial is composed of two phases: (i) An initial screening phase to identify a suitable patient population, and (ii) a randomised comparative trial. The aim of the screening phase is to identify a medically suitable population, to obtain a molecular profile of the patient's tumour, to collect baseline data concerning patient demographics and disease characteristics and to obtain pre-treatment blood and tumour samples for further translational research. A genetic profile will be obtained from tumour-derived DNA and RNA samples by next-generation sequencing and from circulating tumour DNA. The trial Molecular Tumour Board will determine whether each patient harbours a targetable molecular alteration for one or more of the trial MTTs. Patients with disease control after 4 cycles of 1L-SoC, who did not experience limiting toxicity, and whose tumour harbours at least one targetable molecular alteration, will be invited to participate in the randomised phase of the trial in which 159 eligible patients will be randomised (2:1) to receive either maintenance therapy with a matched MTT or to continue 1L-SoC treatment.
Phase
3Span
207 weeksSponsor
UNICANCERPeterborough
Recruiting
Clinical and Immunogenetic Characterization of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) and Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)
Giant cell arteritis (GCA), also known as temporal arteritis, is the most common form of primary systemic vasculitis, with up to 75,000 cases a year identified in the EU and US. It occurs almost exclusively in people over the age of 50 years and is considered to be a medical emergency. If not treated with high-dose glucocorticoids immediately, the thickening of the inflamed blood vessel wall can cause irreversible visual loss or stroke. GCA can lead to significant morbidity across a variety of systems, due to both the disease, and complications of treatment. Diagnosis may be confirmed with a temporal artery biopsy, imaging (e.g. USS/CT/MRA/PET-CR) or based on clinical signs (e.g. erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and symptoms (e.g. a new headache, jaw claudication, visual disturbances, temporal artery abnormality such as tenderness or decreased pulsation) . Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is characterised by inflammatory limb-girdle pain with early morning stiffness, and a systemic inflammatory response demonstrated by elevated inflammatory markers. The UK GCA Consortium is a multi-centre observational study, the main arms of which recruit prospective (participants with suspected GCA) and retrospective cohorts (participants with confirmed GCA diagnosis). Analysis of data collected on these cohorts will help achieve the primary aim of finding genetic determinants of GCA and PMR susceptibility, in order to yield novel insights into disease pathogenesis. Secondary aims, and their associated analyses, are as follows: - Phenotype: characterising GCA and PMR subtypes, based on clinical features; imaging; cells; subcellular fractions and molecules in the circulation and/or arterial tissue; genetic/epigenetic/transcriptomic/proteomic or metabolomics factors, including next generation sequencing (whole exome sequencing) of selected cases. - Life impact: determining what aspects of the disease and treatments affect patients' quality of life, as assessed by patient-reported outcomes. - Long-term outcomes: characterising prognosis of GCA and PMR - both effects of the disease and its treatment - by longitudinal follow-up through electronic linkage to health records. - Exploratory analyses: exploring the potential role of environmental factors and co-morbidities on phenotype and outcomes. - Diagnosis, prognosis: improving diagnosis of GCA and PMR, and identifying factors that predict diagnosis, such as diagnostic clinical features, and prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers. - Disease activity: monitoring participants who commence a synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (s/bDMARD). Finding a biomarker for GCA and PMR disease activity, which might be clinically useful in helping to optimise steroid and s/bDMARD treatments for individual patients.
Phase
N/ASpan
1190 weeksSponsor
University of LeedsPeterborough
Recruiting
A Trial of Early Detection of Molecular Relapse With Circulating Tumour DNA Tracking and Treatment With Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy in Patients With ER Positive HER2 Negative Breast Cancer
The TRAK-ER trial is a multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial in patients with early stage oestrogen reception positive (ER+) human epidermal growth receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer, whom have detectable circulating DNA (ctDNA) but no overt macroscopic disease on imaging. TRAK-ER aims to demonstrate that fulvestrant plus palbociclib improves relapse free survival compared to standard endocrine therapy in this patient group. Despite current treatment, patients with ER+HER2- breast cancer are considered high-risk of distant recurrence for more than the first two decades after initial diagnosis. ctDNA analysis provides a non-invasive, serial source of tumour material which can monitor tumour dynamics and detect molecular relapse. TRAK-ER will be split into two phases, the first surveillance phase aims to investigate the use of ctDNA to identify and predict the risk of molecular relapse in early ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients whom are receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy with no overt macroscopic disease on imaging. Using ctDNA assays, patients enrolled on TRAK-ER will receive ctDNA testing on a three-monthly basis for up to three years. In the instance where ctDNA is detected, imaging will determine whether overt disease is present. If a patient had a positive ctDNA detection and no macroscopic disease on the staging scan, the patient will be randomised to one of the treatment groups in the second phase of TRAK-ER, the treatment phase. The treatment phase of TRAK-ER will be a randomised, open-label study which aims to determine whether fulvestrant plus palbociclib (intervention arm) improves relapse free survival compared to standard endocrine therapy (control arm) in patients carried through from the surveillance phase. Patients on each arm will receive treatment (fulvestrant plus palbociclib or standard endocrine therapy) for up to 24 months. Six monthly imaging will determine the presence of macroscopic disease. If macroscopic disease is observed, the patient will discontinue TRAK-ER treatment and commence standard therapy outside of the TRAK-ER trial.
Phase
2Span
440 weeksSponsor
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustPeterborough
Recruiting
A Randomised Open-label Phase III Trial of REduced Frequency Pembrolizumab immuNothErapy for First-line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab targeting the T cell inhibitory PD-1 receptor has significantly improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately 3600 new patients are treated in the 1st line setting per year in England alone and up to 25% remain on 6 weekly pembrolizumab for 2 years. However, pharmacological and clinical trial data suggest current frequent dosing for 2 years result in overtreatment. Indeed, pembrolizumab remains bound to its target receptor for up to 100 days following a single dose and studies in multiple tumour types have found no relationship between dose and patient outcome. Moreover, anti-PD1 treated patients who respond but discontinue therapy either as planned after 2 years, or earlier because of toxicity, can either remain in remission and/or be sensitive to re-challenge with pembrolizumab. REFINE-lung will test whether reduced pembrolizumab dose frequency (9, 12, 15, 18 weeks) after 6 months of standard treatment is safe and effective. This UK study represents a unique opportunity to determine whether pembrolizumab dose frequency can be safely reduced in NSCLC, resulting in significant cost benefits to the NHS and globally, in addition to enhanced patient QoL associated with fewer hospital attendances and reduced toxicity.
Phase
3Span
258 weeksSponsor
Imperial College LondonPeterborough
Recruiting
PROphylaxis for paTiEnts at Risk of COVID-19 infecTion -V
Part 1: Inhaled repurposed agents The trial commenced with the first intervention, nasal niclosamide and matched placebo from February 2021. The intended second intervention is nasal and inhaled ciclesonide. Participants are being randomised in a 1:1 ratio until the second intervention is introduced. Once ciclesonide is introduced, participants who are eligible for ciclesonide will be randomised to niclosamide, ciclesonide, niclosamide matching placebo or ciclesonide matching placebo in a 2:2:1:1 ratio. The net result will be a 1:1:1 distribution between niclosamide, ciclesonide and placebo, with niclosamide-matching placebo and ciclesonide-matching placebo pooled for the analysis. Three vulnerable patient populations were enrolled initially: dialysis patients, kidney transplant recipients and those with vasculitis or other auto-immune kidney disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or glomerulonephritis (GN) These patient groups are noted to be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 infection by virtue of demographics, underlying co-morbidities or as a consequence of treatments for these conditions, and they are at exceptionally high risk of adverse outcomes. Additionally these groups are known to mount sub-optimal responses to vaccination. Approximately 1500 participants will be randomised to active treatment or placebo, stratified by PROTECT sub-population, age and participating sites. Enrolment to the trial will be via an online platform following informed consent with a face to face screening visit. The screening visit will include assessment of eligibility (which will include liver function tests and COVID-19 PCR test), randomisation, baseline data collection and research serum sample collection to detect anti SARS-COV-2 antibodies. Subsequent assessments, aside from an in person end of trial visit, will be done via email or telephone together with utilising the routine collected health data thus reducing the burden to participants as well as reducing their exposure to COVID-19. Telephone consultations will be carried out at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, followed by two weekly self-reporting at week 8 onwards. If a participant has not submitted data for a period of approximately 6 weeks, they will be contacted by the local study team for a telephone interview to minimise loss to follow up. Failure to follow up a participant for more than 6 consecutive weeks will halt their trial treatment dispensation until communication has been restored. Failure to follow up a participant for more than 12 consecutive weeks will be considered loss of follow up and conclude their participation in the trial. If a participant develops symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection they should arrange an urgent COVID-19 test. They should notify their trial physician. Participants should continue taking trial medication (if self-administering medication) until advised to stop by a member of the trial team or admitted to hospital. Any participant testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 will be required to complete a COVID-19 symptom assessment at least weekly for 4 weeks after diagnosis, unless hospitalised. A final safety assessment will be conducted in person, 4-6 weeks after the final treatment. Participants will be asked to return all completed medication diaries and IMP containers, if self-administering, for compliance assessment at this visit. Participants will be asked a series of questions to identify any additional adverse events or adverse reactions experienced since their last follow up assessment and a blood sample will be taken for a SARS-CoV2 total antibody assay, to detect asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 infection. At the final assessment, patients may be re-screened for consideration of enrolment into one of the other arms of the PROTECT-V trial platform. It is not permitted for re-enrolment into the originally assigned arm. Participants will continue allocated treatment until one of the following occurs: 1. The required number of the primary outcome events have occurred (for each intervention) 2. The participant is hospitalised with COVID-19 (see 4.10.2.) 3. 28 Days after a diagnosis of COVID-19 if hospitalisation is not required The anticipated median treatment duration per participant is 6 months. However, the individual arm may conclude while some participants are in the trial for less than 6 months if the required number of events are observed. All Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions will be recorded in the medical notes and in the appropriate section of the case report form. Serious adverse events and serious adverse reactions should be reported to the sponsor. Niclosamide is a derivative of salicylic acid and has been used to treat tapeworm infections. The exact target and mechanism of action is uncertain. Researchers at Institut Pasteur Korea have reported niclosamide as one of the most potent FDA approved inhibitors of SARS-Cov-2 in in vitro assays using vero cells, with IC50 of 0.28μM >25x higher than that of chloroquine and >40x higher than that of remdesivir. In-vitro data indicating potent inhibition of SARS-COV2 replication and cellular penetration, together with evidence that SARS-COV2 initially replicates predominantly in the nasal epithelium, suggests nasal niclosamide is best placed as a prophylactic agent or for treatment of early stage COVID-19 disease when the viral load is a main issue. Hepatic clearance is the primary mechanism for elimination and there is anticipated low bioavailability, therefore no dose adjustments are required for patients with renal impairment. Side-effects (based on a phase 1 study in healthy volunteers) are minor nasal irritation, sneezing or runny nose. Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment will be conducted in the first 30 participants receiving niclosamide for safety purposes, to exclude the unlikely possibility of accumulation of niclosamide during the course of the trial in patients receiving dialysis only. Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has been shown to possess in vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. Ciclesonide inhibits in vitro SARS-CoV-2 replication in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells via a novel mechanism on non-structural protein 15 (NSP-15). ICS, particularly at higher doses, have been shown to reduce expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors, which mediate infection of host respiratory epithelial cells. ICS have also been shown to inhibit in vivo production of IL-6, a key pro-inflammatory cytokine in COVID-19 and a major predictor of severe disease and poor outcomes. The proposed combination of prophylactic inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide will deliver early infection modifying therapy covering the entire respiratory epithelium, critical in the early stages of COVID-19. Ciclesonide and its active metabolite are metabolised and excreted by hepatic mechanisms, therefore no dose adjustments are required for patients with renal impairment, Side-effects may include cough, bronchospasm, bad taste and application site reactions. Part 2: Monoclonal antibodies and anti-viral agents Sotrovimab is a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody (mAb) derived from the parental mAb S309, a potent neutralising mAb directed against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. S309 binds to a highly conserved epitope of the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) and inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Sotrovimab demonstrates high affinity binding to the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD. COMET-ICE is a Phase II/III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which evaluated sotrovimab as treatment for COVID-19 infection in non-hospitalised patients at high risk of medical complications of the disease. The primary endpoint, progression of COVID-19 at Day 29, was reduced by 85% compared with placebo. A single dose of 500 mg was selected for the study based on in vitro neutralisation data, in vitro resistance data, and IV PK data from the COMET-ICE [NCT04545060] study. No dose modification is required in renal or hepatic disease. The overall rate of AEs in COMET-ICE was similar in those treated with sotrovimab compared to placebo. The known side-effects of sotrovimab are hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis. There will be a single infusion of sotrovimab or placebo administered at the beginning of the study. Based on the pharmacokinetics of the drug, it is predicted that the single infusion will remain efficacious for approximately 16 weeks. An absent or suboptimal response (Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay result <400 AU/mL) to COVID-19 vaccination, assessed at least 14 days after the vaccine was initially require to be eligible for the sotrovimab arm of the study however, this have been remove from the criteria. Additional patient groups with primary immunodeficiency, any Haematology or Oncology patient who is currently receiving or has received chemotherapy or who is immunocompromised as a result of their disease or treatment, those with a diagnosis of an autoimmune or inflammatory disease receiving immunosuppression and also haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients have been added. In addition to the core components of the screening visit previously listed the following will also be conducted: ECG, serum antibody sample for Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay, full blood count, clotting profile, renal and liver function test (routine ALT/AST tests performed up to 2 week before screening visit will be accepted to assess liver function), and serum pregnancy test in women of child bearing potential, urine albumin: creatinine ratio. At the day 1 infusion visit, prior to commencing the IMP infusion, a blood sample to measure anti-drug antibodies will be collected. Routine observations must be taken prior to infusion, at the end of infusion and 1 hour after infusion and to be recorded. PK samples to be taken within 1 hour after end of infusion. Telephone consultations/remote telephone assessments will be carried out weekly for the first 4 weeks, alternative weeks from week 6 to 24 and then every 4th week from week 28 to 36. In person assessments will occur during weeks 4, 12 and 24 and will include blood sample collection for measurement of COVID-19 antibodies and PK sampling.
Phase
2/3Span
202 weeksSponsor
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustPeterborough
Recruiting
Early Vasopressors in Sepsis
Sepsis results from overwhelming reactions to microbial infections where the immune system initiates dysregulated responses that lead to remote organ dysfunction, shock and ultimately death. Sepsis remains a significant global issue - as well as direct mortality, survivors suffer long term reductions in patient centred outcomes, with reduced quality of life and functional status. Patients with hypotension and organ hypoperfusion as a result of sepsis have poorer outcomes by dysregulated inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, immune suppression, and organ dysfunction. Current guidelines highlight the importance of early fluid resuscitation, but the association of early fluid therapy with improved outcomes is unclear. In the resuscitation phase, current practice is to give intravenous (IV) fluid and intermittent vasopressor boluses if required, before, for some patients, continuous vasopressor infusion via a central venous line in Intensive Care (ICU). An alternative, early continuous peripheral vasopressor infusion (PVI) is not routine practice in the UK. Current practice in the UK is guided by NICE Sepsis guidance and the international Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) consensus recommendations. Both specify intravenous fluid administration as a central tenet of early resuscitation of patients with septic shock, with intravenous vasopressor administration recommended after intravenous fluid resuscitation. NICE recommend boluses of 500ml of crystalloid and "refer to critical care for review of management including need for central venous access and initiation of vasopressors". SSC recommend 30ml/kg crystalloid in first hour, followed by vasopressors to maintain MAP>65. The current NICE fluid resuscitation guideline, November 2020, continues to emphasise 500ml boluses of crystalloid as usual care. A recent international survey of 100 critical care and EM physicians regarding intravenous fluid resuscitation practice, confirmed that an initial bolus of 1000ml of crystalloid, followed by 500ml boluses of crystalloid remained the most common management strategy for the initial treatment of septic shock. This persisted despite the lack of benefit demonstrated in three landmark trials of protocolised sepsis management. In recent years, there has been increasing acceptance of peripheral administration of norepinephrine, based on evidence of safety and efficacy. The Intensive Care Society published guidance on peripheral vasopressor infusion in November 2020. We have recently conducted a survey amongst ED and ICU clinicians in the UK regarding attitudes and current practice related to the use of intravenous peripheral vasopressors. Eighty two respondents provided the following answers 1. Experience of use of any intravenous vasopressor in ED was high (81%); 2. Exclusive PVI made up 23% of all vasopressor use in ED; 3. Norepinephrine (norepinephrine) was the most common vasopressor (54%); 4. Barriers to PVI were local protocols and an appropriate level of care in the destination ward for a patient on vasopressor infusion.
Phase
3Span
264 weeksSponsor
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydePeterborough
Recruiting
Study to evaLuate the effIcacy and Safety of abeLacimab in High-risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Have Been Deemed Unsuitable for Oral antiCoagulation (LILAC-TIMI 76)
Phase
3Span
201 weeksSponsor
Anthos Therapeutics, Inc.Peterborough
Recruiting
UK Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Approximately half of patients with heart failure have a normal, or preserved, left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (Owen et al, 2006). Rather than being a single diagnosis, it has become clear that HFpEF represents a heterogeneous syndrome involving a range of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical factors and outcomes (Lewis et al, 2017). However, to-date, HFpEF has generally been considered as a single disease entity. Several high profile phase III trials in HFpEF have shown potentially impressive efficacy in some subgroups of patients, but failed to prove significance over entire cohorts (Pitt et al, 2014) (Solomon et al, 2019). This is likely due to the 'one-size-fits-all' approach taken, with insufficient stratification of the various underlying disease mechanisms. The large and rapidly growing burden that HFpEF places on our healthcare systems mean there is a pressing need to better understand HFpEF and improve the management of patients with it. The recurrent lack of benefit of the one-size-fits-all approach mandates a new, personalised approach. The UK HFpEF registry will be a key platform for collaborative UK clinical and translational HFpEF research. The aim is that multiple centres will collaborate and contribute patients such that the registry will provide deep phenotyping, linked to outcomes, in, ultimately, many thousands of patients. This will enable, for example, machine learning techniques to be applied at scale in order to reclassify HFpEF more powerfully. It will provide a platform for the development of diagnostics specific to the different HFpEF subgroups, and for more effective trials that will target groups of patients in whom new, repurposed or previously discarded treatments are expected to be effective. Moreover, it will provide cohorts of patients readily available for recruitment, with linkage in place for outcomes. It could be used to leverage commercial funding and participation, facilitated by simplified, single-point access for industry. It will enable scaled investigation aimed at understanding causes of HFpEF, improving risk stratification and providing better care.
Phase
N/ASpan
765 weeksSponsor
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustPeterborough
Recruiting
Platinum and Polyadenosine 5'Diphosphoribose Polymerisation Inhibitor for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer and/or Germline BRCA Positive Breast Cancer
Randomised, phase II/III 3 stage trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with TNBC and/or gBRCA. Disease under investigation: Breast Cancer Purpose of clinical trial: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and/or germline BRCA (gBRCA) breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy. Trial Design: Open label, randomised, 3-stage Phase II/III Sample Size: Minimum of 780 patients (including at least 220 gBRCA patients equally allocated to the control and the selected research arm). Non Investigational Medicinal Products: Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to be given as per local practice and 3 cycles of anthracyclines as per local practice. Treatment period: A minimum of 21 weeks of chemotherapy followed by surgery. Procedures: Screening & enrolment Eligible patients with early breast cancer will be registered and consented for screening: BRCA mutation test Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes(TILs) score Cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) +/-, Androgen Receptor (AR) status by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Standard assessment prior to chemotherapy Standard staging to exclude metastatic disease. When eligibility is confirmed, patients will be randomised via a web-based central system which will allocate each patient a unique randomisation number associated with one of the treatment arms. PARTNERing Pathway - For those patients who still have residual disease after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- olaparib there is the opportunity to be screened to a sub-study to receive a further two cycles of chemotherapy consisting of Duralumab and AZD6738. End of Trial: For patients, the end of trial is after the last follow-up visit or contact with the research team planned 10 years after surgery. Procedures for safety monitoring during trial: Pharmacovigilance will be performed by the PARTNER Trial Office. Also, the Trial Management Group and the Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee will regularly review the patient safety data. Criteria for discontinuation of trial treatment on safety grounds: Severe toxicity or inter-current illness, requiring cessation in the judgement of patient's clinician. Patient within 4 weeks has not recovered from toxicity to an extent that allows further treatment. Patient unable to comply with trial procedures. Disease progression while on trial treatment. Patient becomes pregnant.
Phase
2/3Span
948 weeksSponsor
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustPeterborough
Recruiting
ACL SNNAP Trial: ACL Surgery Necessity in Non Acute Patients
The ACL SNNAP study is a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial with two-arm parallel groups and 1:1 allocation ratio to compare non-surgical management (Rehabilitation) and surgical management (Reconstruction) options for patients with a symptomatic non-acute ACL deficient knee. The objective is to determine, in patients with non-acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency (ACLD), whether non-surgical treatment (with the option for later ACL reconstruction if required) is more effective than surgical ACL reconstruction (as measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS4] at 18 months from randomisation). Target sample size is 320 patients recruited from approx. 30 NHS orthopaedic units. An internal pilot will be conducted with clear progression criteria regarding recruitment. Both interventions are routine NHS treatments. Intervention content is based on a minimal set of pre-established criteria in order to ensure the integrity of the comparison while allowing for varying in practice in delivering the interventions between both surgeons and physiotherapists. This largely pragmatic approach will allow clinical management to reflect current practice and resource use within the NHS thus aiding generalisation. Other than the allocated intervention, both groups will be followed-up in the same way to exclude bias. Follow up for study purposes will be by patient self-reported questionnaire completed using an electronic data capture collection system (a postal option will also be available). The questionnaire will include the outcomes indicated in section 4 and will be completed by participants at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Non-response will be minimised through use of multiple reminders such as web based, phone and text. Neither participants nor health care practitioners (surgeons and physiotherapists) can be blinded to receipt of the intervention.
Phase
N/ASpan
278 weeksSponsor
University of OxfordPeterborough
Recruiting