Rheinstrasse 26, Switzerland

Subcutaneous Tarlatamab in Participants With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (DeLLphi-308)

Trial Comparing Systemic Therapy Alone and With Local Ablative Treatment for Stage IV NSCL Cancer Patients

In this study, the aim is to find out whether, after a good response to standard therapy, it is better if the main tumor and metastases are additionally removed by surgery and/or radiation. This intervention is referred to as local ablative therapy (LAT). There is evidence to suggest that this additional intervention may prolong the average time to possible cancer recurrence (PFS: Progression-free survival) or lead to longer survival on average. Therefore, the question is to know if these treatments prolong life, and if so, by how much and with what implications. Currently, patients who respond to initial standard therapy are not routinely offered LAT. If the results of this study are positive, it will lead to a fundamental change in the current standard of practice. The benefit of a therapy is not solely determined by the extension of PFS or overall survival but also heavily influenced by how the therapy impacts patient's quality of life. Medication side effects, pain, fatigue, nausea or extended hospital stays can significantly diminish the perceived positive effects of a treatment from the patient's viewpoint, even if it appears favorable from a medical standpoint. Therefore, the assessment of quality of life through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a central aspect of this study. This study will enroll 128 patients from different Swiss hospitals, randomly assigning them to either the intervention group (LAT) or a control group (standard therapy). The study is expected to span approximately two years for each patient.

International Registry of Accidental Hypothermia

The aim of the International Hypothermia Registry is to improve rescue, treatment and outcome of accidental hypothermia victims. The principal objectives of the International Hypothermia Registry are: - Improving the outcome of accidental hypothermic patients (survival and normal neurologic function); - This outcome is dependent on the presenting status of the patient (temperature, trauma, cardiac arrest, etc.); - The hospital treatment and rewarming method will also influence the outcome, invasive vs. non-invasive rewarming and rewarming rate. - Quality control, assessment of hypothermia cases This IHR is mainly prospective but retrospective entries are welcome. There is no data limit on retrospective cases: cases of any year can be entered.

A Trial of Placebo Versus Macrolide for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Childhood Pneumonia: MYTHIC Study

Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) is the most frequently detected bacterial pathogen in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized U.S. children. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, M. pneumoniae was responsible for 8-28% of childhood CAP and thus was substantially contributes to CAP being a leading cause of hospitalization in high-income settings and worldwide morbidity and mortality. After the corona virus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic, M. pneumoniae and its delayed re-emergence remains a thread to children's health. CAP accounts for more treatment days with antibiotics in children's hospitals in the U.S. than any other condition. Macrolides are the first-line treatment for M. pneumoniae infection. Still, there is a lack of evidence for macrolides' the effectiveness in the treatment of M. pneumoniae induced CAP; simultaneously there is an alarmingly increasing antimicrobial resistance among M. pneumoniae. Therefore, childhood CAP, and especially M. pneumoniae, is an important target for antimicrobial stewardship efforts and cost-effectiveness considerations. The MYTHIC Study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial in 13 Swiss pediatric centers. Previously healthy ambulatory and hospitalized children aged 3-17 years with clinically diagnosed CAP will be screened for a M. pneumoniae infection with Immunoglobulin M (IgM) lateral flow assay. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive a 5-day-treatment of macrolides (azithromycin) or placebo.

Darolutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

Metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable despite several major improvements in the treatment. In the case of pretreated metastatic castration-resistant disease (mCRPC) the options remain scarce and there is still an unmet need in this patient population. For the majority of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) the combination of androgen deprivation (ADT) and ARPI (or even a triplet treatment with ADT, docetaxel and darolutamide or abiraterone) has become standard of care. However, when patients become metastatic castration resistant (mCRPC) over time a change of systemic treatment is necessary and thus this paradigm switch in treatment of mHSPC has had a major impact on treatment of mCRPC patients. Many patients developing metastatic castration-resistant disease these days have not only received ADT but also an ARPI and, in some cases, also docetaxel. Therefore, the treatment options in the first line setting of mCRPC are restricted and the outcome is poorer compared to the past. Improvement of first line mCRPC is an important unmet clinical need. The SAKK has demonstrated in two earlier studies that maintenance treatment with an ARPI (orteronel in SAKK 08/11 or darolutamide in SAKK 08/16) can improve radiographic progression-free survival in pretreated mCRPC patients after ARPI and/or taxane based. This maintenance concept could be introduced more generally in the first line setting of mCRPC. In the SAKK 08/16 trial, darolutamide maintenance was shown to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo, in patients with mCRPC who had received prior ARPI, and whose disease did not progress during taxane therapy. This benefit was more pronounced in patients with prior response to ARPI. Taken together it is hypothesized that the continued AR-pathway blockade with darolutamide in patients progressing from mHSPC to mCRPC on ARPI treatment can improve outcome when it is added to a standard first line mCRPC therapy and then continued as maintenance. SAKK proposes to add the ARPI darolutamide to standard first line mCRPC treatment consisting of either taxane chemotherapy (docetaxel or cabazitaxel), olaparib, radium 223 or LuPSMA. The choice of standard of care treatment is up to the investigator, respecting the country specific approvals. Darolutamide will be given concomitantly with the chosen first line treatment and will be continued as maintenance afterwards until radiographic progression.

Intratumoral INT230-6 Followed by Neoadjuvant Immuno-chemotherapy in Patients With Early TNBC. INVINCIBLE-4-SAKK

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses significant challenges due to its aggressiveness, high relapse rates, and increased mortality. The Keynote-522 study revealed a 19.6% incidence of event-free survival (EFS) events in early-stage TNBC patients over 39 months. Achieving pathological complete response (pCR) and clearing positive lymph nodes are crucial prognostic factors. The IMP INT230-6 is a combination of the chemotherapeutic agents cisplatin and vinblastine, along with a molecule that facilitates their distribution in tumor tissue. INT230-6, currently in clinical trials, has demonstrated the ability to induce up to 95% necrosis in T2 breast cancer tumors and it has been observed to stimulate systemic immune activation during the period between diagnosis and surgery. Moreover, promising results have been seen in seven refractory breast cancer patients, resulting in decreased Ki67 levels and a median overall survival of 12 months. Completed and ongoing U.S. clinical trials including 91 patient a window-of-opportunity trial demonstrate the safety and early activity of INT230-6, both alone and with checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and ipilimumab, particularly in resistant cases. Based on the positive outcomes, it will be assessed within this clinical trial the safety and early clinical activity of INT230-6 in early TNBC patients, addressing the high unmet medical need in this challenging subtype.

LIBERTY: Liquid Biopsy to Diagnose and Monitor CNS Involvement in High-risk B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (B-NHL) are cancers that arise from a subtype of white blood cells (lymphocyte) and typically involve the lymphatic system; they represent 4% of all cancers [SEER database, access 2022]. Despite booming novel antineoplastic agent development, a significant number of aggressive B-NHL patients continue to succumb to their disease, experiencing rapidly progressive disease or early relapse. Central nervous system or CNS (brain, spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)) involvement in aggressive B-NHL is a rare (2-5%) but it is a devastating event, with a life expectancy ranging between 2 and 5 months [PMID: 30125215]. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents fragmented DNA that originates from tumors cells, carrying specific cancer-associated mutations that can be detected in the blood or other fluids subsumed under "liquid biopsies". The role of ctDNA gained momentum with the advent of high throughput sequencing technologies, becoming increasingly relevant for clinical practice. In lymphoma, detecting and monitoring ctDNA has been shown to be feasible and of high prognostic relevance regarding response and relapse. As such, ctDNA is emerging as a promising biomarker that can provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information [PMID: 30125215, PMID: 29449275]. Identification of patients suffering from aggressive B-NHL at high risk of CNS relapse remains extremely challenging and currently mainly relies on a clinical score (CNS-IPI) [PMID: 27382100]. The detection of asymptomatic CNS is limited to conventional techniques and is not standardized [PMID: 22927246]. In patients with biopsy-proven CNS lymphoma, ctDNA can be detected in CSF (CSF ctDNA) in approximately 95% of cases. Furthermore, CSF ctDNA is predictive of CNS relapse in a small series of neurologically asymptomatic patients with aggressive B-NHL [PMID: 36542815, PMID: 32079701, PMID: 34551072]. Prevention and treatment of CNS involvement remains a great unmet clinical need. The discovery of novel and robust biomarkers is of paramount importance for early detection and risk-adapted therapeutic strategies for CNS involvement. The investigators hypothesize that CSF ctDNA is superior to current standard diagnostic procedures (e.g., flowcytometry or cytology) to detect CNS involvement in high-risk patients. Furthermore, in patients with positive CSF ctDNA, the investigators also postulate that the concept of monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD, small amount of ctDNA that persists in patients that have no signs of active disease on standard imaging techniques) will provide additional information on patient prognosis. This is a multicenter prospective diagnostic study to compare the performance of experimental diagnostic test (ctDNA) versus conventional cytology (CC) and flow cytometry (FC). Each high-risk B-NHL participant will proceed through standard work-up to evaluate potential CNS involvement including a neurological physical examination, a brain MRI and a diagnostic lumbar puncture. Each participant's CSF will be assessed by the two diagnostic tests (CSF ctDNA and conventional test (CC/FC)); the gold standard being proven CNS lymphoma involvement.

ClassIntra® for Better Outcomes in Surgery - CIBOSurg

A Study for Observing Severe Asthma in Patients Treated With Tezepelumab

This is a 12-month, multi-country, multi-center, prospective, non-comparative and non-interventional (observational), post-reimbursement real-world evidence study that will assess asthma symptom control, lung function, and patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life after tezepelumab treatment initiation in participants with severe asthma in Europe and Canada. This study is planned to be conducted in several countries including but not limited to Canada, Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, and Sweden. Participants will be followed for a maximum period of 52 weeks after tezepelumab treatment initiation, irrespective of treatment discontinuation.

A Study of Sigvotatug Vedotin Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer