Torrelavega Cantabria, Spain
Treatment Strategies and Survival Outcome for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Oncogenic Mutation
The purpose of this study is to assess the Treatment Strategies and Survival Outcome for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Oncogenic Mutation. Our study was set up with several group with EGFR mutant, ALK fusion, ROS1 fusion, RET fusion, BRAF mutation, NRG1 fusion, MET alteration, KRAS mutation, etc.
Phase
2Span
402 weeksSponsor
Hunan Province Tumor HospitalRecruiting
Comparing Combinations of Targeted Drugs for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Has EGFR and MET Gene Changes (A Lung-MAP Treatment Trial)
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare investigator-assessed progression-free survival (IA-PFS) between participants with EGFR mutated, MET amplified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomized to INC280 (capmatinib) and osimertinib with or without ramucirumab. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate if the combination of INC280 (capmatinib), osimertinib and ramucirumab or INC280 (capmatinib) and osimertinib during the first cycle of treatment has an acceptable toxicity rate. II. To evaluate the frequency and severity of toxicities within the arms. III. To compare IA-PFS between the arms, in the subset of participants with centrally-confirmed MET amplification in tissue. IV. To compare IA-PFS between the arms, in the subset of participants with centrally-confirmed MET amplification based on circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA). V. To compare IA-PFS between the randomized arms in the subsets of participants with and without history of brain metastases. VI. To compare the objective response rate (ORR) (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial) between the arms among participants with measurable disease at baseline. VII. To compare overall survival between the arms. VIII. To compare IA-PFS between the randomized arms in the subsets of patients who have received only 1 prior line of therapy and those who have received 2 or more prior lines of therapy. IX. To evaluate duration of response among responders within each arm. TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE OBJECTIVES: I. To collect, process, and bank cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) prior to treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, and first progression for future development of a proposal to evaluate comprehensive next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA). II. To establish a tissue/blood repository from participants with refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive capmatinib orally (PO), osimertinib PO, and ramucirumab intravenously (IV) on study. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and collection of blood samples throughout the trial. ARM B: Patients receive capmatinib PO and osimertinib PO on study. Patients also undergo CT scan or MRI and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
Phase
2Span
213 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkRecruiting
Osimertinib Therapy After Resection in High-risk Stage I EGFRm NSCLC (OSTAR)
Patients will be tested for the status of EGFR-sensitive mutations prior to enrollment and confirmed positive by central laboratory testing.The surgically removed tumor foci will be confirmed by central laboratory pathologic examination for their pathological subtypes, solid and/or micropapillary components ≥10%, and/or STAS positive. These patients had undergone complete resection of the tumor, and 65 patients who met the criteria for inclusion were enrolled to receive Osimertinib. Patients had to be enrolled and given Osimertinib within 10 weeks of complete resection.The dose of Osimertinib in this study was 80 mg once a day and the planned duration of treatment was 3 years (156 weeks). Patients will be evaluated for safety and efficacy at baseline, at week 12, and every 12 weeks thereafter until completion or termination of treatment. Patients were followed up every 24 weeks to 5 years (264 weeks) and annually thereafter for disease recurrence. Overall survival (OS) was observed every 24 weeks for 5 years (264 weeks) after disease recurrence and annually thereafter.The primary endpoint of the study was 3-year DFS rate. Disease-free survival (DFS) should be calculated from the date of entry on Osimertinib to the date of disease recurrence or death. After the primary analysis (3-year DFS rate), patients' survival status will be followed up according to the simplified study plan (OS analysis period) until the final OS analysis data is available. In the event of disease recurrence, patients will be re-staged and all sites of recurrence of NSCLC will be recorded. It will be up to the doctor to decide what treatment the patient will receive after a relapse;and cancer treatment after recurrence will be documented.Taken together, all primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints in this study strongly describe the overall benefit of adjuvant Osimertinib in a population of patients with high-risk EGFRm+ stage I NSCLC who have been surgically completely resected.
Phase
2Span
366 weeksSponsor
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and HospitalRecruiting
Osimertinib as First-line Therapy for Patients With Late-stage Lung Cancer
Phase
2Span
149 weeksSponsor
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruiting
Osimertinib With Chemotherapy as First-line Therapy for EGFR Mutation-positive NSCLC
The objectives of this study are to assess the effectiveness and safety of Osimertinib combined with chemotherapy in a real-world setting in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
Phase
N/ASpan
188 weeksSponsor
AstraZenecaRecruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Osimertinib With Early Intervention SRS Treatment Compared to the Continuation of Osimertinib Alone, in Patients With EGFR Mutated NSCLC and Asymptomatic Brain Metastases
Phase
N/ASpan
304 weeksSponsor
Hadassah Medical OrganizationRecruiting
Osimertinib Resistance in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma That Have Progressed.
Initially, patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC respond well to osimertinib, a third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), but eventually progress. Upon progression, three main resistance mechanisms can be found (1, 2): 1) alteration of the drug target by secondary or tertiary EGFR mutations (e.g. C797S mutation in the EGFR kinase domain), 2) alteration of downstream signal transduction proteins (e.g. KRAS mutation / amplification) and 3) bypass track resistance like MET or HER2 amplification. A fourth, less frequent, mechanism involves morphological alterations: dedifferentiation by epidermal-mesenchymal transition (EMT) or change to small-cell-lung carcinoma (SCLC), including RB1 loss. New therapeutic strategies are being developed to target these resistance mechanisms and reports have been published about successful treatment of HER2 and MET amplification. Drugs targeting the C797S mutation are entering the clinic. Next Generation Sequence (NGS) technology rapidly evolves and it is now feasible to analyse broad panels of genetic alterations in tumor tissue as well as in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). ctDNA based T790M detection is a valid method to test for resistance to first or second generation EGFR TKI's and the ctDNA based technique is increasingly being used for patients with progression on the third generation EGFR TKI osimertinib. Actually, the distribution of osimertinib resistance mechanisms, as known to date, largely comes from ctDNA based datasets, because biopsy based analyses are scarce. Due to impaired sensitivity of ctDNA based analyses when compared to tissue based analysis, especially for copy number variations, these reports might be misleading and lead to suboptimal treatment. Early reports of tumor samples obtained after progression on first / second generation EGFR TKI's have shown that ctDNA and tumor based drug resistance analyses can be concordant or disconcordant and that the tests should be regarded as complimentary [Oxnard et al]. Sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA and biopsy based drug resistance analysis after osimertinib treatment and how these tests behave within individual patients are unknown. Thorough and complete osimertinib resistance analysis enables optimal treatment decision making and might identify new targets for molecular treatment, thereby potentially improving patient outcome.
Phase
N/ASpan
261 weeksSponsor
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteRecruiting
Study on Savolitinib Combined With Osimertinib in Treatment of Advanced NSCLC With MET Amplification
This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, phase III clinical study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Savolitinib combined with Osimertinib in treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with MET amplification after failure of EGFR inhibitor therapy.
Phase
3Span
158 weeksSponsor
Hutchison Medipharma LimitedRecruiting
Osimertinib With Bevacizumab for Leptomeningeal Metastasis From EGFR-mutation Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
This is a phase II pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib with bevacizumab for LM from EGFRm NSCLC patients. ALL patients were treated with Osimertinib 80mg oral daily and bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg intravenous every 3 weeks. Study therapy continued until disease progression, unacceptable adverse event, or withdrawal of consent.
Phase
2Span
192 weeksSponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityRecruiting
A Retrospective Study of EGFR-TKIs,Gefitinib, Erlotinib and Osimertinib in NSCLC Patients Treatment
The ADME-associated SNPs included are CYP3A4,CYP3A4,CYP1A1,CYP2D6, ABCB1,ABCG2 and so on .The somatic mutations included are EGFR ,K-RAS ,ALK and so on
Phase
N/ASpan
748 weeksSponsor
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruiting