Andalucã­a, Spain

RIVAroxaban Versus Low-molecular Weight Heparin in Patients With Lower Limb Trauma Requiring Brace or CASTing

Optimization of the Diagnosis of Bone Fractures in Patients Treated in the Emergency Department by Using Artificial Intelligence for Reading Radiological Images in Comparison With Traditional Reading by the Emergency Doctor.

Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Based on 4PEPS

Several strategies have been devised to safely limit the use of thoracic imaging in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, they are based on different rules for clinical probability (CP) assessment, rendering their combination difficult. The four-level pulmonary embolism probability score (4PEPS) allows the combination of all other strategies using a single CP assessment. Methods and analysis: SPEED&PEPS is a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial. After a preliminary period aimed to assess the possibility of inclusions and current practices in 23 Emergency Departments (ED), 20 EDs will be selected to participate to the active phase and randomization. Half of the centers will be allocated to the control group where physicians will be free to do as they see fit but they will be given the recommendation to apply a validated strategy. Half of the centers will be allocated to the interventional group where the physicians will be given the recommendation to apply the 4PEPS strategy. Patients with suspected PE will be included and followed for 90 days (anticipated number of patients to be included: 2560, 1280 in each arm). The primary objective will be to demonstrate that the application of the 4PEPS strategy by emergency physicians, in comparison to current practices, (i) does not increase the risk of serious events related to diagnostic strategies and (ii) significantly reduces the use of thoracic imaging. If successful, the SPEED&PEPS trial will have an important impact for patients suspected of PE limiting their irradiation and for public health in substantial savings in terms of the direct cost of diagnostic investigations and the indirect cost of hospitalizations due to waiting times or delayed harmful effects. Funding: This work is funded by a French Public Health grant (PREPS-N 2019). The funding source plays no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or the writing of the manuscript.

Covid-19 Pediatric Observatory

Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients with Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism

The identification of subgroups of patients at high risk of cancer might enable more efficient screening strategies for early detection of cancer. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first manifestation of an occult cancer. All tumor sites may be involved. In an individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA), it was reported a 1-year prevalence of occult cancer of 5.2% (95%CI 4.1-6.5) among patients presenting with unprovoked VTE. Two recent multicenter randomized controlled trials (e.g. SOME (Canada) and MVTEP (France) trials) failed to demonstrate that extensive cancer screening strategies diagnosed more cancers, more early stage tumors, or improved cancer-related mortality in comparison with a more limited screening strategy. However, the main limitation of these studies was the twice lower than expected overall incidence of occult cancer diagnosis in unselected patients with unprovoked VTE, which limited the statistical power. In the IPDMA, it was also reported that the 1-year period prevalence of occult cancer was 7-fold higher in patients aged ≥ 50 (6.8%; 95%CI 5.6-8.3) as compared with those < 50 years (1.0%; 95%CI 0.5-2.3). Moreover, in the MVTEP trial, the incidence of missed cancers over a 2-years follow-up period was significantly lower in patients randomized to a 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) screening strategy. Thus, the most promising diagnostic modality for occult cancer screening seems to be FDG-PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT which allows a one-stop whole-body imaging, is routinely used for the diagnosis, staging and restaging of various cancers. The MVTEP2 Trial seeks to determine if among higher risk patients (≥ 50 year-old) with a first unprovoked VTE, a cancer screening strategy including a FDG-PET/CT decreases the number of missed occult cancers detected over a 1-year follow-up period as compared with a limited screening alone.

Insulin Dextrose Infusion vs Nebulized Salbutamol vs Combination of Salbutamol and Insulin Dextrose in Acute Hyperkalemia

InSaKa trial is a therapeutic, controlled, open label, with parallel groups of treatment in a 1:1:1 ratio, multi-centre, national and randomized clinical trial to compare insulin/dextrose intravenous infusion, nebulized salbutamol or combination of salbutamol and insulin/dextrose to reduce serum potassium levels at 60 minutes. Eligible patients will be recruited in the emergency department and included in the study after testing for inclusion and non-inclusion criteria. Patients will be eligible for the randomization if they had a serum potassium concentration superior or equal to 6 mmol per liter. Randomization, which will be performed centrally, will be stratified 1) according to the serum potassium level at baseline of the initial treatment phase (6 to < 6.5 mmol per liter [moderate hyperkalemia] AND superior or equal to 6.5 mmol per liter [severe hyperkalemia]), and 2) according to the prescription or not of intravenous diuretics during the 6 previous hours. The protocol will be approved by the ethical committee (random allocation) of the IRB. All patients will provide written informed consent and the study will be performed in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All electrocardiograms will be read at a core electrocardiographic laboratory. At the time of screening, patients who meet all the inclusion and do not have non-inclusion criteria will be assigned to one of the 3 groups of treatment. The serum potassium will be then measured at 60 minutes. If the patient still has hyperkalemia at 60 minutes, the patient will be re-administered a treatment, left at the discretion of the physician in charge. This treatment might include insulin/dextrose intravenous infusion, nebulized salbutamol, the combination of nebulized salbutamol and insulin/dextrose intravenous infusion, bicarbonate, diuretics or dialysis. Especially, bicarbonate should be prescribed in case of metabolic acidosis or hypovolemic shock, and diuretics in case of acute heart failure. Importantly, if the patient has a major cardiovascular event before 60 minutes, all these treatments might be prescribed at the discretion of the physician in charge, if the clinical situation requires one or more of these therapeutic options, and based on up-to-date clinical practice guidelines and recommendations. Serum potassium levels will be measured at local laboratories at baseline and 60, 180 minutes and 24 hours. They will perform a visual inspection and a validated semi-quantitative test on each blood sample as an assessment for hemolysis. An independent adjudication committee will adjudicate all major cardiovascular events. The trial will be monitored by a Data Safety Monitoring Board.

Study of the Effectiveness of a Polymer Cerclage System Compared to Cerclages Used in Standard Care (CERCPMCF) )

Prevention of COVID-19 Complications in High-risk Subjects Infected by SARS-CoV-2 and Eligible for Treatment Under a Cohort ATU ('Autorisation Temporaire d'Utilisation') OR or Authorisation for Early Access (AAP). A Prospectvie Cohort.

Same Day Ambulatory Appendectomy (SAMBA)

Early Discontinuation of Steroid Treatment in Negative FDG-PET/CT Patients With Idiopathic Retroperitoneal Fibrosis

At baseline visit: Eligible patients will be screen during a standard visit care (consultation or hospitalization). A clinical examination, an abdominal CT scan, blood and urine biological tests will be performed. At inclusion visit: After verification of inclusion and non inclusion criteria, if the patient meets the eligibility criteria, the investigator, will provide the patient with information and details regarding the trial. The consent is obtained and signed after a reflection period of 30 minutes. The following procedure will be scheduled within 7 days: - 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT) (pregnancy test if mandatory) - Specimens for the biocollection Patients with positive FDG PET/CT (hypermetabolism grade II or III) at M0 will receive oral steroids (prednisone) at 1mg/kg/day during 1 month and then the dose will be tapered to obtain <10mg/day at 6 months and <7,5mg/day at 9 months. Patients with a negative FDG-PET/CT (hypermetabolism grade 0 or I) at M0 will be excluded of the study. Follow-up visits : M6, M9,M12,M15,M21, relapse At M6, M12, and M15: During these visits clinical examination (blood pressure measurement, body temperature, heart rate, weight and clinical signs or symptoms related to IRF) will be performed. An abdominal CT scan may be performed as part of the care depending on the clinician's judgment. Glucocorticoid compliance and tapering, concomitant medications and adverse events (including serious cardiovascular adverse events) will be assessed and recorded. A nurse will collect blood and urine. At M9, M21 or relapse : During these visits clinical examination, an abdominal CT scan, a FDG-PET/CT blood and urine biological tests will be performed. At M9: The patients who failed to reach remission at M9 are considered as treatment failure and will be treated on best medical judgment by the investigator and excluded to the study. The patients who had a dose of prednisone ≥7,5mg / day at M9 will also be excluded to the study. Patients who achieved remission at M9 and have a retroperitoneal fibrosis visual score grade 0 or I under a dose of prednisone <7,5mg / day will discontinue steroids treatment. Patients who achieved remission at M9 and have a retroperitoneal fibrosis visual score grade II or III under a dose of prednisone <7,5mg / day will continue steroids treatment at the actual dose (medical judgment).