Gedatolisib in Combination With Darolutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
This is a Phase 1/2, open-label, randomized, dose finding and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, in combination with darolutamide, a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following progression on a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor. The aim of the Phase 1 portion of the study is to evaluate dose limiting toxicities and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose. The aim of the Phase 2 portion of the study is to further assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of the drug combination.
Phase
1/2Span
205 weeksSponsor
Celcuity IncDetroit, Michigan
Recruiting
Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination With Capecitabine for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers After Progression on Standard Therapy
This is a single institution, open-label phase I trial that aims to assess the safety of combination sacituzumab govitecan plus capecitabine in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancers after progression on standard therapy. Gastrointestinal cancers eligible include pancreaticobiliary cancers, colorectal cancers, and upper gastrointestinal cancers such as esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cancers. The trial follows a 3 + 3 design and has three planned dose levels. The starting dose of sacituzumab govitecan is 7.5mg/kg intravenously on Days 1 and 8. The starting dose of capecitabine is 500mg/m2 orally twice daily for two weeks on and one week off. Plan is accrue a total of 20 patients. The primary endpoint is the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) Secondary Endpoints include adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), There is an exploratory endpoint of the correlation between Trop-2 expression and clinical outcomes. Patients will be recruited from the Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology clinics within the Henry Ford Cancer Institute (HFCI) campuses. The study is divided into a Screening period, Treatment period, End of Treatment (EOT) period, and Follow-up period. During Screening period patients will provide written informed consent (ICF) to participate in the study before completing any protocol-specified procedures or evaluations not considered to be part of the patient's standard care. Procedures that were performed for standard of care prior to signing informed consent may be used for screening purposes (e.g., full physical exam) as long as the procedures were completed within the 28-day screening period. After signing the ICF, patients will be evaluated for entry criteria during the screening period within 28 days before administration of study drugs. Rescreening after screen failure will be allowed. Treatment will continue until unacceptable toxicity, death, progression of disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1, Investigator's decision to discontinue treatment, the patient withdraws consent, is lost to follow-up, or Institution decides to terminate the trial. Patients with PD per RECIST 1.1 but with otherwise stable or improved performance and clinical status may continue to be treated in the event of a perceived benefit per Investigator; see Section "Treatment beyond progression". Patients with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) will continue to receive treatment until achievement of a confirmed complete response (CR), disease progression, or intolerance to therapy. It is at the discretion of the Investigator to continue treating patients with a confirmed CR.
Phase
1Span
80 weeksSponsor
Henry Ford Health SystemDetroit, Michigan
Recruiting
A Study of ZL-1310 in Subjects With Small Cell Lung Cancer
This is an open-label, ascending, multiple-dose, phase 1 study evaluating ZL-1310 as a single agent, in combination with Atezolizumab, and in combination with Atezolizumab and Carboplatin in subjects with extensive SCLC.
Phase
1Span
184 weeksSponsor
Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.Detroit, Michigan
Recruiting
A First-In-Human, Phase 1 Study Evaluating Oral TACC3 PPI Inhibitor, AO-252, in Advanced Solid Tumors
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, tolerability including determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). The study will also look at pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of AO-252 as a monotherapy in participants with advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), high- grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and endometrial cancer
Phase
1Span
169 weeksSponsor
A2A Pharmaceuticals Inc.Detroit, Michigan
Recruiting
A Phase III Study of Dato-DXd With or Without Durvalumab Compared With Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-L1 Positive Locally Recurrent Inoperable or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate superiority of Dato-DXd + durvalumab relative to ICC + pembrolizumab by assessment of PFS as assessed by BICR in participants with PD-L1 positive locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC. The study will be stratified based on geographic location (US/Canada/Europe vs. Dato-DXd monotherapy enrolling countries vs. rest of world), disease-free interval (DFI) history (de novo vs. prior DFI 6 to 12 months vs. prior DFI > 12 months), and prior PD-1/PD-L1 treatment for early stage TNBC (yes vs. no). This study aims to see if Dato-DXd with durvalumab allows patients to live longer without their breast cancer getting worse, or simply to live longer, compared to patients receiving standard of care chemotherapy and pembrolizumab. This study is also looking to see how the treatment and the breast cancer affects patients' quality of life.
Phase
3Span
383 weeksSponsor
AstraZenecaDetroit, Michigan
Recruiting
Comparing Dara-VCD Chemotherapy Plus Stem Cell Transplant to Dara-VCD Chemotherapy Alone for People Who Have Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare major organ deterioration progression-free survival between participants randomized to the autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and non-ASCT arms of this study. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study. II. To compare rates of cardiac and renal organ responses between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study. III. To compare rates of cardiac and renal organ progression between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of the study. IV. To compare the frequency and severity of toxicities between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study. V. To compare minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ACST arms of this study. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the best overall hematologic response rates between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study. II. To compare rates of hematologic complete response (CR) and very good partial response, following completion of consolidation therapy between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study, post-consolidation. III. To compare hematologic progression-free survival between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study. IV. To compare time to next treatment between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of the study. V. To evaluate utilization of delayed ASCT in participants randomized to the non-ASCT arm of the study. TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare MRD negativity rates from bone marrow aspirates via next generation flow cytometry (NGF) between the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study post-consolidation. II. To bank specimens for future use. TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate MRD negativity rates at post-induction, and compare MRD negativity rates at 12 months post-consolidation from bone marrow aspirates via NGF between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study. II. To investigate the association of achieving MRD negativity at any point (post-induction, post-consolidation, or 12 months post-consolidation) via NGF from bone marrow aspirates with major organ deterioration-progression free survival (MOD-PFS). III. To investigate the association of achieving sustained MRD negativity (MRD negative at two consecutive measurements -- post-induction, post-consolidation, and 12 months post-consolidation) via NGF from bone marrow aspirates with MOD-PFS. QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare patient-reported physical function following consolidation treatment between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29+2 Profile version (v) 2.1 physical function sub-scale. QOL SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare patient-reported fatigue following consolidation treatment between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms using the PROMIS-29 fatigue subscale. II. To compare longitudinal changes in physical function using the PROMS-29+2 between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms. QOL EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess baseline symptom burden in AL amyloidosis patients prior to induction therapy using the PROMIS-29+2. II. To compare mean scores of symptom scales using the PROMIS-29+2 following consolidation treatment, and at 6 months and 12 months from step 3 registration between treatment arms. III. To compare mean scores of functional scales using the PROMIS-29+2, following consolidation treatment, and at 6 months and 12 months from step 3 registration between treatment arms. IV. To explore whether longitudinal changes in symptoms, functioning, and overall heath related quality of life (HRQoL) as assessed by the PROMIS-29 +2 (version 2.1) differ according to treatment group and, separately, according to baseline cardiac or renal involvement using interaction tests between participants randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms. V. To compare health utility indices using the PROMIS preference score (PROPr) between patients randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms. PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO)-COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS (CTCAE) PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare patient reported symptoms regarding treatment emergent adverse events of interest using the Patient Reported Outcome CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) Measurement System between patients randomized to the ASCT and non-ASCT arms of this study. OUTLINE: INDUCTION: Patients receive daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj subcutaneously (SC) over 3-5 minutes on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 for 2 cycles and then days 1 and 15 for cycle 3. Patients receive bortezomib SC over 3-5 minutes, cyclophosphamide orally (PO) or intravenously (IV), and dexamethasone PO or IV on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 3 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and fat pad aspiration at screening. Patients undergo echocardiography at screening, the completion of induction, and at progression. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy at screening, post induction treatment and at progression. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection at screening, at the start of each cycle, and the end of treatment and during follow up or at progression. CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve an overall response of partial response or better after 3 cycles of Dara-VCD are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj SC over 3-5 minutes on days 1 and 15 as well as bortezomib SC over 3-5 minutes, cyclophosphamide PO or IV, and dexamethasone PO or IV on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 3 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo echocardiography at screening and at progression. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy within14-28 days post consolidation treatment and at progression. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection at screening, at the start of each cycle, and the end of treatment and during follow up or at progression. ARM II: Patients undergo collection of peripheral blood stem cells. Patients receive melphalan IV for 1 cycle and then 2 days later receive the stem cell transplant IV in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo echocardiography at screening and at progression. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy within 60-90 days post initiation of stem cell transplant. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection at screening, during treatment, and the end of treatment and during follow up or at progression. MAINTENANCE: Patients receive maintenance daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj SC over 3-5 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up 18 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo echocardiography at screening, 12 months post consolidation treatment and at progression. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy 12 months post consolidation treatment and at progression. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection at screening, during treatment, 12 months post consolidation treatment and during follow up or at progression. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 or 6 months up to 4 years after registration.
Phase
3Span
331 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkDetroit, Michigan
Recruiting
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab Compared With Placebo in Children 5 to < 12 Years Old With Severe Asthma
This is a phase-3 multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group placebo-controlled, randomised study. The study will comprise of: 1. Screening/Run-in period of 4 to 6 weeks, 2. 52-week double-blind Treatment period, 3. Post-treatment Follow-up period of 12 weeks. Participants will be randomised 2:1 to receive either tezepelumab or placebo administered by (SC) Subcutaneous injections for 52 weeks (double-blind Treatment period). There will then be a 12-week off-treatment Follow-up period for participants who do not continue in the optional open-label Active Treatment Extension period. An optional open-label Active Treatment Extension will allow all eligible participants the opportunity to receive active treatment with tezepelumab. The Active Treatment Extension period of the study will start following the 52-week double-blind Treatment period and will consist of a 24-week open-label Treatment period prior to the 12-week post-treatment Follow-up period.
Phase
3Span
228 weeksSponsor
AstraZenecaDetroit, Michigan
Recruiting
A Study of ADRX-0706 in Select Advanced Solid Tumors
This is a 2 part study. The Phase 1a will consist of a dose escalation of ADRX-0706 to evaluate initial safety and tolerability in patients with select advanced solid tumors, and to identify the recommended dose to be used in the Phase 1b. The Phase 1b will further evaluate the safety and tolerability, as well as preliminary efficacy, and identify the optimal dose of ADRX-0706 in patients with urothelial cancer, triple negative breast cancer, and cervical cancer.
Phase
1Span
171 weeksSponsor
Adcentrx TherapeuticsDetroit, Michigan
Recruiting
P-CD19CD20-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With B Cell Malignancies
Phase 1 study consisting of two parts. Part 1 is a weight-based dose escalation following a 3+3 design of dose-escalating cohorts to define a maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Part 2 includes administration at a selected dose and LD regimen. After enrollment, subjects will receive a lymphodepletion therapy regimen before administration of allogeneic CAR-T cells, administered as a single dose. Treated subjects will undergo serial measurements of safety, tolerability and response. Rimiducid may be administered.
Phase
1Span
885 weeksSponsor
Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.Detroit, Michigan
Recruiting
Safety, PK, and Preliminary Efficacy of MBRC-101 in Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors
Phase 1, dose escalation, will enroll approximately 30 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. EphA5 expression will not be required for enrollment into Phase 1 but will be assessed retrospectively. Phase1b, the dose expansion phase will evaluate the safety and preliminary clinical activity of MBRC-101 at potential OBRDs and dosing regimens in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. Phase 1b will enroll 3 expansion cohorts of ≈ 20 patients per cohort (n ≈ 60 total). The Phase 2 portion will begin when the RP2D has been determined from Phase 1b and all Phase 1b patients have completed at least two cycles of treatment or have discontinued from the study prior to completing two cycles of treatment. Phase 2 will evaluate anti-tumor activity and safety of the RP2D determined during Phase 1b. Phase 2 will focus on a specific tumor type identified during Phase 1/1b and will enroll approximately 30 patients. Safety will be monitored by the Safety Review Committee (SRC) at each dose escalation in Phase 1 and at regular intervals throughout Phase 1b and Phase 2. Overall Response Rate (ORR), Progression Free Survival (PFS), Response Rate (RR), Overall Survival (OS), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and Complete and Partial response (CR and PR) will be used to evaluate efficacy per RECIST v1.1 criteria based on the results of positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT), computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
Phase
1/2Span
160 weeksSponsor
MBrace TherapeuticsDetroit, Michigan
Recruiting