Harstad, Norway

A PK Study to Compare GME751 (Proposed Pembrolizumab Biosimilar) and US-licensed and EU-authorized Keytruda® in Participants With Stage II and III Melanoma

Eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either GME751, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-licensed pembrolizumab (Keytruda-US) or European Union (EU)-authorized pembrolizumab (Keytruda-EU). The maximum study duration for a participant will be approximately 28 weeks including screening. Treatment duration is 24 weeks (4 treatment cycles, each of 6 weeks duration). However, subject should discontinue study participation in case of disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or other reasons. Participants who are benefiting from treatment with pembrolizumab without signs of recurrence or unacceptable toxicity will be eligible for continued pembrolizumab treatment via most suitable option based on the respective country regulations.

Early Intravenous to Oral Antibiotic Switch in Uncomplicated Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia

The study is conducted at 12 government tertiary hospitals with infectious diseases physicians in Malaysia. The study population comprises of 290 patients with uncomplicated SAB who have received 3 to 7 days of definitive IV antimicrobial therapy. Eligible participants are randomized 1:1 into 2 groups, early oral antibiotic switch versus standard IV antibiotic therapy, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study consists of 3 stages for each patient with a duration of approximately 12 weeks: screening and enrolment, open-label treatment with 7 to 11 days of study antibiotics, and follow-up until day 90 post-randomization. Phone call or inpatient follow up will be conducted at Day 7-11, Day 30, and Day 90 post- randomization to review patient's condition.

Preheated Composites Vs. Conventional Composites in Noncarious Cervical Lesions

Transesophageal Echocardiography To Diagnose Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury Traumatic Aortic Injury

This is a multicentre prospective observational trial. All trauma patients with suspected BTAI at the emergency department (ED) will undergo resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography to evaluate the thoracic aorta. Resuscitative TEE is a minimally invasive procedure to evaluate all chest trauma patients. Besides the aorta, TEE can also provide other useful information regarding the hemodynamic status, cardiac function and lung pathology of the patient. Patients will be recruited into the study by investigators who take informed consent from the patient or next of kin prior to the TEE procedure. For all patients with suspected BTAI, CTA is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of BTAI. TEE findings of BTAI will be compared to CTA which will be considered the reference standard unless confirmation is available from surgical procedures or autopsy. Inter-observer variability for normal or pathological TEE images interpretation is performed prior to the initiation of the study.

Malaysian COVID-19 Anosmia Study (Phase 2) - A Nationwide Multicentre Case-Control Study

The world is currently in the midst of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that is caused by a novel coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). According to published cohort studies on COVID-29 infected patients, the most prevalent symptoms consist of fever, dry cough, dyspnoea, sputum production, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, diarrhoea, and sore throat. Recently, there have been concerns of significant viral transmission through asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic or even mildly symptomatic patients. There is increasing anecdotal evidence from patients and healthcare professionals highlighting isolated loss of sense of smell (anosmia) and taste disturbances (dysgeusia) as atypical symptoms of COVID-19 infection in otherwise asymptomatic patients. In parallel, expert statements from the British Association of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery (ENT UK), British Rhinological Society, and the American Association of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) have suggested that olfactory and taste disturbances could be a clinical feature of COVID-19 infection. Rapidly emerging evidence from Europe, the United Kingdom and the United States have found olfactory and taste disturbances to be highly prevalent in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. In contrast, there is currently limited evidence from Asia on the prevalence of these symptoms in COVID-19 infection. Additionally, there is also limited evidence on the predictive value of screening for olfactory and taste disturbance in COVID-19 patients with subclinical symptoms. The aim of this case-control study is to study the predictive value of screening for olfactory and taste disturbance in patients with COVID-19 infection in Malaysia. The cases will be selected from the cohort of COVID-19 positive patients recruited from participating Malaysian Ministry of Health-designated COVID-19 treating hospitals across the country (from Phase 1 of the Malaysian COVID-19 Anosmia Study). Controls will be recruited from healthy volunteers who will will answer the an online questionnaire to evaluate and characterise their olfactory and taste symptoms. This is the same questionnaire that is answered by the COVID-19 patients in case cohort.

A Study of Elacestrant Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With ER+,HER2-, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence

Phase 2a Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AZD4604 in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Asthma Uncontrolled on Medium-High Dose ICS-LABA

Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Compared With CDK4/6 Inhibitor Plus Endocrine Therapy or Plus Camizestrant in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative (IHC 0, 1+, 2+/ ISH Non-amplified), BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2m Advanced Breast Cancer

Approximately 2,620 participants will be screened to achieve approximately 500 participants randomised to study intervention. Participants will be randomised in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of the following intervention groups: - Arm 1: saruparib (AZD5305) plus camizestrant - Arm 2: Physician's choice CDK4/6i plus physician's choice ET - Arm 3: Physician's choice CDK4/6i plus camizestrant Treatment continues until BICR-confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity occurs, or the participant withdraws consent.

A Research Study Comparing How Well Different Doses of the Medicine NNC0519-0130 Can Reduce Kidney Damage in People Living With Chronic Kidney Disease

An Adjuvant Endocrine-based Therapy Study of Camizestrant (AZD9833) in ER+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer (CAMBRIA-2)

This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer with intermediate-high or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy). The planned duration of treatment in either arm of the study is 7 years. Eligible patients must have intermediate-high or high risk of recurrence as defined by specified clinical and biologic criteria. Concurrent use of abemaciclib is permitted in both arms. The primary endpoint of the study is Invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) and main secondary endpoints include Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), Overall survival (OS), Safety and Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs). Patients will be followed for 10 years from randomization of the last patient.