Moriyama Shiga, Japan

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of VAX-31 in Healthy Infants

A Study to Learn About How a New Pneumococcal Vaccine Works in Infants

A Study to Learn About How a New Pneumococcal Vaccine Works in Children

Testing Longer Duration Radiation Therapy Versus the Usual Radiation Therapy in Patients With Cancer That Has Spread to the Brain

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine if the time to local failure is improved with FSRS compared to SRS in patients with intact (i.e., unresected) brain metastases. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare time to intracranial progression-free survival between FSRS and SRS. II. To compare overall survival between FSRS and SRS. III. To determine if the time to local failure is improved with FSRS compared to SRS, as evaluated by central review of imaging. IV. To evaluate if there is any difference in central nervous system (CNS) failure patterns (local versus [vs.] distant brain failure vs. both) in patients who receive FSRS compared to patients who receive SRS. V. To compare the rates of radiation necrosis in patients who receive FSRS vs. SRS. VI. To compare the time to salvage whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) between patients who receive FSRS and those who receive SRS. VII. To compare the rates of post-treatment adverse events associated with FSRS and SRS. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo SRS over 30-90 minutes for 1 fraction on study. Additionally, patients undergo computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on study. ARM II: Patients undergo FSRS over 30-90 minutes for 3 fractions on study. Additionally, patients undergo CT and MRI on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1 year then every 6 months for 3 years.

Otitis Treatment with OtoSight™ - Modification of Antibiotic Treatment Intervention in Children

Mixed method, multi-center, pragmatic, cluster-randomized effectiveness-implementation investigation focused on pediatric subjects presenting with ear complaints at the office setting. For the prospective randomized component, eligible clinicians at a given site will be randomized to one of two groups: the OtoSight intervention group or the usual care control group. There will be three (3) periods of post-intervention assessment: 10 days (optional), 6 months, and 12 months. Eligible subjects will be automatically enrolled (or invited to enroll) in the clinical trial and will receive information. Because this is a non-interference design, frontline care clinicians randomized to either arm will be asked to: (1) assess the presence or absence of fluid in the middle ear; (2) record a diagnosis; and (3) treat the patient as they would according to the information available to them. A separate retrospective historical matched control arm will also be conducted to analyze potential Hawthorne effect at a subset of collaborating practices or healthcare systems. Randomization of clinicians (and not children) will decrease contamination in the usual practice group (i.e., so clinicians are not asked to flip between intervention and usual care practices).

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Excision And Observation vs Chemoradiotherapy For Rectal Cancer

This study is being done to find out if this approach is better or worse than the usual approach for early rectal cancer. The usual approach is defined as care most people get for early rectal cancer. The usual approach for patients who are not in a study is surgery to remove the rectum or treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, followed by surgery. There are several chemotherapy drugs approved by Health Canada that are commonly used with radiation therapy. For patients who get the usual approach for this cancer, about 90 out of 100 are free of cancer after 5 years. If a patient decides to take part in this study, they will either get a combination of chemotherapy drugs called FOLFOX or CAPOX for up to 12 weeks or will get chemotherapy with radiation therapy for up to 6 weeks. After finishing treatment, and even if treatment is stopped early, the study doctor will watch for side effects and determine which type of surgery would be best. After surgery, patients will be asked to come in every 4 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for an additional year. Then will be checked every year for 2 years. This means seeing the study doctor for up to 5 years after surgery. Patients may be seen more often if your study doctor thinks it is necessary.

A Study of Sigvotatug Vedotin Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

A Urine Sample Collection Study in Apparently Healthy Adults and Adults With Chronic, Stable Morbidities

Finding an Effective Dose of GM1 to Reduce or Prevent Neuropathy (Numbness or Weakness) Due to Treatment With Paclitaxel (Phase II)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To obtain data to further support the safety of increasing monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) doses when given on day 1, concomitantly with paclitaxel. (Early phase) II. To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of GM1 compared with placebo at preventing paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy sensory symptoms as measured by the six individual Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (QLQ-CIPN20) questions that quantify numbness (N), tingling (T), and pain in the fingers/hands and toes/feet. (Phase II) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To obtain additional data to support the safety of GM1 in the treated population. (Phase II) II. To obtain data to support that GM1 looks promising for preventing/decreasing acute paclitaxel pain syndrome as measured by the Acute Pain Syndrome Questionnaire. (Phase II) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Conduct of this clinical trial provides the opportunity to facilitate the better understanding of the natural history of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy, akin to what is being examined in a currently active trial, S1714. (Phase II) II. This clinical trial also provides an opportunity to conduct correlative studies to understand the mechanism of CIPN and/or identify biomarkers of CIPN or GM1 efficacy. (Phase II) III. To obtain efficacy data to assess the impact of GM1 on the anti-tumor activity of paclitaxel as evaluated by progression-free survival and overall survival. (Phase II) OUTLINE: This is an early phase dose-escalation study of GM1 followed by a phase II study. EARLY PHASE: Patients receive GM1 intravenously (IV) over 1 hour either once every 7 days, or once every 7 days for 3 doses followed by one week off, prior to paclitaxel administration. PHASE II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive GM1 IV 1 hour prior to paclitaxel administration and paclitaxel IV weekly for 12 weeks or 3 weeks on/1 week off for 12 doses. ARM II: Patients receive placebo IV 1 hour prior to paclitaxel administration and paclitaxel IV weekly for 12 weeks or 3 weeks on/1 week off for 12 doses.

Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Irinotecan, to the Standard Chemotherapy Treatment (FOLFOX) After Long-Course Radiation Therapy for Advanced-Stage Rectal Cancers to Improve the Rate of Complete Response and Long-Term Rates of Organ Preservation

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate and compare the clinical complete response (cCR) rates in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy (LCRT) followed by neoadjuvant modified fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) versus neoadjuvant LCRT followed by neoadjuvant modified leucovorin , fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare organ-preservation-time (OPT) between two treatment arms. II. To evaluate and compare the disease-free survival (DFS) time between the two treatment arms. III. To evaluate and compare time to distant metastasis between two treatment arms. IV. To evaluate and compare overall survival (OS) between two treatment arms. V. To evaluate and compare toxicity profiles of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) between two treatment arms. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluation of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) kinetics during neoadjuvant therapy & surveillance and to correlate with radiographic, pathologic, and clinical outcomes. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. GROUP I: Patients receive long-course chemoradiation therapy on study and then receive either: FOLFOX regimen consisting of leucovorin intravenously (IV), fluorouracil IV, and oxaliplatin IV or CAPOX consisting of capecitabine orally (PO), and oxaliplatin IV on study. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biospecimen collection throughout the trial. Patients also undergo sigmoidoscopy throughout the trial and biopsy during screening. GROUP II: Patients receive long-course chemoradiation therapy on study and then receive FOLFIRINOX regimen consisting of leucovorin IV, fluorouracil IV, irinotecan IV, and oxaliplatin IV on study. Patients undergo CT scan, MRI scan, and blood specimen collection throughout the trial. Patients undergo sigmoidoscopy throughout the trial and biopsy during screening.