Wachtendonk, Germany

A Study for GSK3862995B in Healthy Participants and Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A Study of Sigvotatug Vedotin Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Zimberelimab and Domvanalimab in Combination With Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab With Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Study of NVL-655 in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Other Solid Tumors Harboring ALK Rearrangement or Activating ALK Mutation (ALKOVE-1)

In Phase 2, study patients will be enrolled into 6 distinct cohorts: - Cohort 2a: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring an ALK rearrangement who have received 1 prior 2nd-generation ALK TKI (ceritinib, alectinib, or brigatinib). Up to 2 prior lines of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy are allowed. - Cohort 2b: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring an ALK rearrangement, who have received 2-3 prior ALK TKIs (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, or lorlatinib). Up to 2 prior lines of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy are allowed. - Cohort 2c: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring an ALK rearrangement, who have received lorlatinib as the only prior ALK TKI therapy. Up to one prior line of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy received prior to lorlatinib is allowed. - Cohort 2d: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring an ALK rearrangement, who are naïve to ALK TKI therapy. Up to one prior line of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy is allowed. - Cohort 2e: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring an ALK rearrangement, not eligible for other Phase 2 cohorts. - Cohort 2f: Patients with other solid tumors harboring an ALK rearrangement or activating ALK mutation, who have received ≥1 prior systemic anticancer therapy, or for whom no satisfactory standard therapy exists.

Adult Arm of DZL All Age Asthma Cohort (ALLIANCE)

The clinical heterogeneity of asthma patients has been increasingly recognised within the last years. Recent studies and articles highlighted the idea of asthma not beeing a single disease but rather a unifying term for multiple phenotypes. Phenotype in this sense is defined as the combination of observable properties of an organism, that are produced by the interactions of a genotype and the environment. In contrast, endotype describes a specific underlying pathophysiological pathway. Linking asthma phenotypes and endotypes in a system biological approach is an important research goal in order to develop targeted therapy, especially for severe asthma. The advantage the investigators' cohort provides is the collaboration with an equivalent pediatric cohort. In this setting questions regarding disease onset, exacerbation and chronicity can be posed and worked with in a comprehensive manner.

Met Non Small Cell Cancer Registry (MOMENT)

This is a disease registry, which is an organized system using non-interventional methods to collect data on a patient population defined by a particular disease, exposure, or condition, and which is followed over time. Non-interventional means that after participants enrollment, participants will be treated according to the routine clinical treatment decision by the physician. The registry will not impose any treatment or procedure for participants.

Study of Dato-DXd Plus Pembrolizumab vs Pembrolizumab Alone in the First-line Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Without Actionable Genomic Alterations

The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of Dato-DXd and pembrolizumab with pembrolizumab alone in terms of either Progression Free Survival (PFS) by BICR or Overall Survival (OS) for participants with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with non-squamous histology without actionable genomic alterations whose tumor has high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (tumor proportion score; TPS ≥50%) and who have not previously received systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the control arm (pembrolizumab alone) or the experimental arm (Dato-DXd and pembrolizumab). The study will be divided into 4 periods: Tissue Screening Period, Screening Period, Treatment Period, and Follow-up Period.

Study to Assess Neoadjuvant Durvalumab (D) and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (CT), Followed by Either Surgery and Adjuvant D or CRT and Consolidation D, in Resectable or Borderline Resectable Stage IIB-IIIB NSCLC (MDT-BRIDGE)

This will be a multicentre, Phase II, single-arm, global study assessing the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant durvalumab and platinum-based CT, given intravenously, followed by either surgery and adjuvant durvalumab or definitive CRT and consolidation durvalumab in participants with resectable and borderline resectable stage IIB-IIIB NSCLC. Neoadjuvant Period A: All participants will initially receive 2 cycles of neoadjuvant durvalumab + CT (investigator's choice platinum-based) every three weeks. Participants will be assessed for resectability by a multidisciplinary team. Neoadjuvant Period B: Cohort 1: Participants who are deemed eligible for surgery will receive study intervention every three weeks for an additional one and up to two cycles, followed by surgery. CRT: Cohort 2: Participants with unresectable tumours (according to MDT re-assessment) will receive definitive CRT (6 one-week cycles) for approximately six weeks. Both cohorts will then go on to receive durvalumab every four weeks until disease progression or recurrence or up to one year.

A Trial to Learn if the Combination of Fianlimab, Cemiplimab, and Chemotherapy is Safe and Works Better Than the Combination of Cemiplimab and Chemotherapy in Adult Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Can be Treated With Surgery

Study Comparing Tarlatamab and Durvalumab Versus Durvalumab Alone in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Following Platinum, Etoposide and Durvalumab