Roetha, Germany

A Phase 3, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study Assessing Rocatinlimab in Prurigo Nodularis

Study of Anti-CEACAM5 ADC M9140 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors (PROCEADE PanTumor)

The study follows a master protocol concept with several separate substudies in specific indications. - Substudy GC: The study duration per participant is on an average approximately 10 months. This includes a 28-day Screening period, infusion (approximately 1 hour) on Day 1 of every cycle, and Safety Follow-up Visit 30 (± 3) days after the last dose of M9140. - Substudy NSCLC: Study duration per participant is approximately 12 months. This includes a 28-day Screening period, infusion (approximately 1 hour) on Day 1 of every cycle, and Safety Follow-up Visit 30 (± 3) days after the last dose of M9140. - Substudy PDAC: Study duration per participant is on an average approximately 8 months. This includes a 28-day Screening period, infusion (approximately 1 hour) on Day 1 of every cycle, and Safety Follow-up Visit 30 (±3) days after the last dose of M9140.

Revumenib in Combination With Azacitidine + Venetoclax in Patients NPM1-mutated or KMT2A-rearranged AML

Effect of Renal Impairment on Enpatoran Pharmacokinetics

A Study in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ESK-001

Tuvusertib Combined With Niraparib or Lartesertib in Participants With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (DDRiver EOC 302)

A Phase 3 Study of Barzolvolimab in Participants With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

This is a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled phase 3 study investigating the efficacy, safety and tolerability of barzolvolimab in adult participants with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who are symptomatic despite treatment with non-sedating second generation H1-antihistamines at 1-4 times the locally approved dose. There is a screening period of up to 4 weeks, followed by a 24-week placebo-controlled treatment period, a 28-week active treatment period where all participants receive barzolvolimab followed by a 16-week treatment free period. Approximately 915 adult participants (610 in the active arms and 305 in the placebo arm) will be randomly assigned to the treatment arms.

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Sonelokimab Compared with Placebo in Adult Participants with Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Oral Cladribine Compared With Placebo in Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (MyClad)

Iberdomide Vs. Iberdomide Plus Isatuximab Maintenance Therapy Post ASCT in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel group, open, phase III clinical trial for a maintenance therapy, for patients who underwent an induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in the GMMG-HD8/DSMM XIX trial. Investigational Medicinal Product: Iberdomid (oral), isatuximab (subcutaneous administration via a wearable injector system). Randomisation will be performed centrally by GMMG/DSMM offices after verification of the eligibility of the patient. At the time of study inclusion, randomization will be performed into arm A (iberdomide) or arm B (iberdomide + isatuximab). Randomization will be stratified by centrally assessed MRD negativity status (yes vs. no vs. unknown); assessed by NGF from BMA; sensitivity of 10^-5; independent of standard IMWG response) and number of HDM/ASCT (single vs. tandem). Patients randomized in arm A will receive 39 cycles of the drug iberdomide, a Cereblon E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Modulating Drug (CELMoD®) that shares structural similarities to the immunomodulatory compounds (IMiDs) such as thalidomide and lenalidomide. Each cycle will last for 29 days. Patients in arm B will receive the same the 39 cycles of iberdomide plus monoclonal anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab subcutaneously. In both arms, patients will receive 20 mg dexamethasone in cycle 1, on the same days as the isatuximab administration in Arm B. End of study will be after 36 months of the maintenance therapy. There is one primary objective: - Demonstration of superiority of iberdomide plus isatuximab compared to iberdomide with respect to bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates (sensitivity 2x10^-6 via next-generation flow cytometry [NGF]) after two years of maintenance therapy. There is one key secondary objective: - PFS, defined as time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Further secondary objectives are: - Rates of sustained MRD negativity (at sensitivity levels of 10-5 and 2x10^-6 via NGF from BMA) after 1, 2 and 3 years of maintenance therapy. - Conversion from MRD positive to negative (at sensitivity levels of 10^-5 and 2x10^-6 via NGF from BMA). - Rates of best overall response to treatment (BOR). - Rates of partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR) and stringent complete response (sCR). - Time-to-next-treatment (TTNT). - PFS on subsequent line of therapy. - Overall survival (OS). - Improvement of IMWG response categories (PR, VGPR, CR, sCR). - Proportions of patients in both treatment arms maintaining BOR and CR from baseline. - Assessment of quality-of-life (QoL) via the EORTC-QLQC30, EORTC-QLQMY20, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires.